SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TML blockbuster

Créé par: DripBayless
Équipe: 2019-20 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2019
Publié: 26 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
solves both teams problems
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
23 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
33 500 000 $
1700 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Haas, Gaetan
1925 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Manning, Brandon
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Burakovsky, André [Droits de RFA]
3.
TOR
  1. Lucic, Milan (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de OTT
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 476 999 $0 $500 000 $5 023 001 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Haas, Gaetan
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
675 000 $675 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 835 000 $2 835 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 juin 2019 à 15 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 472
Mentions "j'aime": 133
No thank you
- Kyle Dubas
26 juin 2019 à 15 h 53
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,657
Mentions "j'aime": 2,518
Probably throw Benning in and it would be a done deal, But Pool Party said he does not want to play in Canada today
26 juin 2019 à 15 h 53
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,112
Doesn't solve the Leaf problems. Cap remains the same and Leaf get the two worse players.
26 juin 2019 à 15 h 55
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,586
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: palhal
Doesn't solve the Leaf problems. Cap remains the same and Leaf get the two worse players.


well.. 4M + 1M (JP) is less than 6.6M.. you're saving 1.5M wink plus 1 less year of Zaitsev
26 juin 2019 à 15 h 56
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,586
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: Copenhagen
Probably throw Benning in and it would be a done deal, But Pool Party said he does not want to play in Canada today


woah what??? link me
26 juin 2019 à 15 h 57
#6
Ryno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 24
Mentions "j'aime": 7
It doesn't solve the Leafs problem in the slightest, because curing the headache of Zaitsev doesn't offset taking on the repeated body blows that is Lucic, even with the potential of Jesse added in.

As Oilers fan, I think we're stuck with the human boat anchor for another year, maybe two, unless the buyout becomes slightly more palatable.
palhal a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 1
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,112
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
well.. 4M + 1M (JP) is less than 6.6M.. you're saving 1.5M wink plus 1 less year of Zaitsev


Well I guess the the Leafs will save more when JP is waived to the Marlies. Zaitsev has been a second pairing Dman on a good team for three years. He has value as NHL Dman despite the rants on CapFriendly.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 3
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,657
Mentions "j'aime": 2,518
Quoting: palhal
Doesn't solve the Leaf problems. Cap remains the same and Leaf get the two worse players.


Yup, Oilers have cap problems too, if you did not notice,
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 3
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,657
Mentions "j'aime": 2,518
Quoting: Ryno
It doesn't solve the Leafs problem in the slightest, because curing the headache of Zaitsev doesn't offset taking on the repeated body blows that is Lucic, even with the potential of Jesse added in.

As Oilers fan, I think we're stuck with the human boat anchor for another year, maybe two, unless the buyout becomes slightly more palatable.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 4
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,657
Mentions "j'aime": 2,518
Quoting: Ryno
It doesn't solve the Leafs problem in the slightest, because curing the headache of Zaitsev doesn't offset taking on the repeated body blows that is Lucic, even with the potential of Jesse added in.

As Oilers fan, I think we're stuck with the human boat anchor for another year, maybe two, unless the buyout becomes slightly more palatable.


His buyout really does not get lower, it is always ****ty (Lucic)
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 7
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,112
Quoting: Copenhagen
Yup, Oilers have cap problems too, if you did not notice,


Yea, I noticed. Actually despite the best efforts of many CapFriendly posts, the Oilers and Leafs don't seem to be a good fit in trades.
Copenhagen a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 7
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
well.. 4M + 1M (JP) is less than 6.6M.. you're saving 1.5M wink plus 1 less year of Zaitsev


The big difference here though, is Zaitsev can actually play. Lucic is not worthy of the 4th line for TO.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 10
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,657
Mentions "j'aime": 2,518
Quoting: LoganOllivier
The big difference here though, is Zaitsev can actually play. Lucic is not worthy of the 4th line for TO.


Well Zaitsev has a brutal contract, and if he was so good, you wouldnt trade him, but yes Lucic really is useless now. But if I was Oilers I would be playing Benning with Nurse as a 2nd D pair, but if you want to get rid of a **** contract, you got to take one, or its no deal, thats why Zaitsev should be moved to a team with at least some cap space, Oilers have nothing
DripBayless a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 11
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,586
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: palhal
Yea, I noticed. Actually despite the best efforts of many CapFriendly posts, the Oilers and Leafs don't seem to be a good fit in trades.


I'd say that's mostly because every fan on here want every trade to be a little bit in favor of their own team. As "realistic" as it gets, we won't really know until a deal is done officially. So people can speculate and keep armchair GMing but until Holland and Dubas actually do business, every ACGM will want a trade that benefits their team more than the other and that way nobody will ever agree.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 13
#15
Ryno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 24
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: Copenhagen
His buyout really does not get lower, it is always ****ty (Lucic)


That's true. Chiarelli's gift that keeps on giving.
Copenhagen a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 16
#16
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,251
Mentions "j'aime": 23,112
Quoting: Copenhagen
Well Zaitsev has a brutal contract, and if he was so good, you wouldnt trade him, but yes Lucic really is useless now. But if I was Oilers I would be playing Benning with Nurse as a 2nd D pair, but if you want to get rid of a **** contract, you got to take one, or its no deal, thats why Zaitsev should be moved to a team with at least some cap space, Oilers have nothing


But Zaitsev doesn't have a brutal contract. Other teams pay their second pairing guys about that money. Zaitsev doesn't play the PP, because of Marner has taken his spot at right point. Zaitsev plays heavy minutes against the top lines and big minutes on the PP. Leafs are need to get rid of cap space and Zaitev right or wrong seems to be target (I think a high priced forward makes more sense).
Personally I would give Zaitsev away....just to get cap space. But certainly aren't taking on bad cap and losing a competent NHL Dman too.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 18
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,586
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: Ryno
That's true. Chiarelli's gift that keeps on giving.


Quoting: Copenhagen
His buyout really does not get lower, it is always ****ty (Lucic)


Well, come the summer of the expansion draft, if we bought him out then, he'd have two years left which means 4 years of dead cap if we bought him out. However, if we traded him at retained cap hit by then, it'd be 3M for the next two seasons. And don't forget his contract is front loaded. Actual money owed on Lucic last 2 years is basically half or a quarter of his cap hit.

Fact of the matter is, the closer we are to his contract's expiry date, the easier it is to trade it.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 23
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Copenhagen
Well Zaitsev has a brutal contract, and if he was so good, you wouldnt trade him, but yes Lucic really is useless now. But if I was Oilers I would be playing Benning with Nurse as a 2nd D pair, but if you want to get rid of a **** contract, you got to take one, or its no deal, thats why Zaitsev should be moved to a team with at least some cap space, Oilers have nothing


Zaitsev has played 20+ minutes for the past 3 seasons on a team that has finished in the top 7 league wide the past 2 seasons. He isn't garbage, he makes about a million too much and has too much term.

So tell me, how does it make sense for a team to move a serviceable NHL player who does make more than he should, for a guy who wouldn't make the team only to shave 1 year of the contract. Keep in mind, if they move Zaitsev, they will need to replace him with something.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 33
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 6,657
Mentions "j'aime": 2,518
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Zaitsev has played 20+ minutes for the past 3 seasons on a team that has finished in the top 7 league wide the past 2 seasons. He isn't garbage, he makes about a million too much and has too much term.

So tell me, how does it make sense for a team to move a serviceable NHL player who does make more than he should, for a guy who wouldn't make the team only to shave 1 year of the contract. Keep in mind, if they move Zaitsev, they will need to replace him with something.


That is why my first sentence of this thread, that i did not make said to throw in Benning, there is your replacement, Bennings stats are better than Zaitsev and will help the leafs, for me there is no way these two teams make a trade except Brown for Benning, which makes sense, but we have a different GM now and not sure if Holland is interested!, Also retaining 2 or 3 million bucks on Lucic like the guy that mad this thread said is still a problem for the Oilers
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 36
#20
Ryno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 24
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
Well, come the summer of the expansion draft, if we bought him out then, he'd have two years left which means 4 years of dead cap if we bought him out. However, if we traded him at retained cap hit by then, it'd be 3M for the next two seasons. And don't forget his contract is front loaded. Actual money owed on Lucic last 2 years is basically half or a quarter of his cap hit.

Fact of the matter is, the closer we are to his contract's expiry date, the easier it is to trade it.


The problem isn't the money owing, it's the fact that so much of it is paid in signing bonuses, which do not provide cap relief savings in terms of the buyout. It really is, for the duration of the contract, nearly buyout proof.

I mean, we all knew that this contract would be an albatross at some time. I don't think any of us thought it would be this much of a cinder block this soon. I can honestly say I've never seen a player's skill set completely erode of a Christmas break the way Lucic's did in Christmas 2017.
Copenhagen a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 38
#21
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Copenhagen
That is why my first sentence of this thread, that i did not make said to throw in Benning, there is your replacement, Bennings stats are better than Zaitsev and will help the leafs, for me there is no way these two teams make a trade except Brown for Benning, which makes sense, but we have a different GM now and not sure if Holland is interested!, Also retaining 2 or 3 million bucks on Lucic like the guy that mad this thread said is still a problem for the Oilers


Benning hasn't really been an answer for Edmonton who hasn't made the playoffs in 2 seasons. How would he be an upgrade over Zaitsev, who plays more minutes and against top end talent? The only trade that I see with Edmonton is Brown for a pic. The Leafs need space and Brown is completely replaceable.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 46
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,586
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Benning hasn't really been an answer for Edmonton who hasn't made the playoffs in 2 seasons. How would he be an upgrade over Zaitsev, who plays more minutes and against top end talent? The only trade that I see with Edmonton is Brown for a pic. The Leafs need space and Brown is completely replaceable.


Agree with that. Either Brown for a 3rd/4th rounder or a prospect perculating in the minors like Hebig
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 49
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,586
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: Ryno
The problem isn't the money owing, it's the fact that so much of it is paid in signing bonuses, which do not provide cap relief savings in terms of the buyout. It really is, for the duration of the contract, nearly buyout proof.

I mean, we all knew that this contract would be an albatross at some time. I don't think any of us thought it would be this much of a cinder block this soon. I can honestly say I've never seen a player's skill set completely erode of a Christmas break the way Lucic's did in Christmas 2017.


agree with the second part. and I guess my whole point is that when people say we're stuck with Lucic's contract, its a bit of an exaggeration. First of all, if you're not dressing him, he's not a problem on the ice. So the Oilers could dress 12 forwards ahead of Milan. Secondly, if push came to shove at the expansion draft, yes buying him out gives us no cap flexibility, but it does mean we get to protect someone else who has more value, so still worth it. And lastly, like I said, his actual money owed is less than his cap hit. Budget teams love to eat these kinds of contracts because it helps them reach the floor. Imagine eating 50% percent of that and we're practically paying his salary to play somewhere else. I'm saying the contract is easier to move than you make it seem to be.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 53
#24
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: ConnorsCousin
Agree with that. Either Brown for a 3rd/4th rounder or a prospect perculating in the minors like Hebig


Well considering Braun got a 2nd and a 3rd when SJ traded him to Philly, I'd say the return for Brown is a 2nd or a 3rd.
26 juin 2019 à 16 h 59
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,586
Mentions "j'aime": 390
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Well considering Braun got a 2nd and a 3rd when SJ traded him to Philly, I'd say the return for Brown is a 2nd or a 3rd.


right, Brian Boyle and Ryan Hartman both got 1st rounders back. Does that mean we're all gonna offer that? Is Sam Gagner worth a 1st rounder? Come on man. 3rd rounder + Brodziak is most I'm willing to do for Brown, anything else I'll look for third liners in FA worth 2M.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage