SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lets try again

Créé par: OTTrebuild
Équipe: 2019-20 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 17 juin 2019
Publié: 17 juin 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
55 500 000 $
44 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Backes, David (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Bjork, Anders
  3. Grzelcyk, Matt
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (BOS)
2.
OTT
  1. Miller, Kevan
  2. Senyshyn, Zach
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2019 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 000 000 $78 434 167 $0 $2 412 500 $4 565 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 937 500 $2 937 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 juin 2019 à 9 h 28
#1
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
that Shattenkirk trade is disgusting.

Don't mind the Tierney trade though.
17 juin 2019 à 9 h 28
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,314
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Shattenkirk is terrible
17 juin 2019 à 9 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,861
Mentions "j'aime": 8,867
Still over the cap and roster is short.

Like the Sens deal. Keep the 5th though.

Backes for Shatty straight up maybe. Otherwise...no.
OTTrebuild a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2019 à 9 h 33
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,293
Mentions "j'aime": 7,029
So, I know you’re not a bruins fan, but this is, well, pretty off.
You picked the only terms that McAvoy and Carlo and guaranteed not to sign, as both bring them directly to ufa without buying out any ufa years. Literally anything other than 4 and 5 years respectively is possible.
The shattenkirk trade is terrible, grizz is their best 5 on 5 left shot d. He’s not moving.

I would stop being a bruins fan if they did this.
17 juin 2019 à 9 h 34
#5
Démarrer sujet
OTTrebuild
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 167
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: jcash08
that Shattenkirk trade is disgusting.

Don't mind the Tierney trade though.


I can see why you wouldnt like the shattenkirk trade but keep in ind there is only 2 years left on his contract and he has proven that he is capable of putting up 40+ point seasons! Just hasnt done it in the last 2 years so his value has decreased so BOS might be able to get away with trading a backes (only 2 years left) a good prospect in bjork and a proven top 6 D in Grezlyck!
17 juin 2019 à 9 h 44
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 467
Mentions "j'aime": 50
Why don't the Sens take him? This playoff should have told us we need to add size on the backend not more turnover machines like Sh_tty.
17 juin 2019 à 9 h 48
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,851
Mentions "j'aime": 639
Quoting: OTTrebuild
I can see why you wouldnt like the shattenkirk trade but keep in ind there is only 2 years left on his contract and he has proven that he is capable of putting up 40+ point seasons! Just hasnt done it in the last 2 years so his value has decreased so BOS might be able to get away with trading a backes (only 2 years left) a good prospect in bjork and a proven top 6 D in Grezlyck!


Grzelcyk is proven. He has been an NHL d man for two years now. So much so he went from 16+m to 19+m from season 1 to season 2. He is pretty proven at this point. In 129 his corsi and fenwick are 53 & 53.6 respectively. He also went from 54% Ozone starts to 50% which tells me they have no issues with him whatsoever. They would be better off buying out Backes' or trading him once his real money decreases (7/1).


Grzelcyk is better than Shattenkirk by a lot. Shattenkirk's contract may actually be worse than Backes' & you get a good prospect & Pick? - Bjork, who despite people being low on him (Boston fans) has made the team for two years out of camp and was paired with Bergeron and Marchand. He just can't stay healthy. Hopefully that is not the case moving forward...
OTTrebuild et jcash08 a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2019 à 9 h 52
#8
j_cash08
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 587
Mentions "j'aime": 169
Quoting: Propeller09
Grzelcyk is proven. He has been an NHL d man for two years now. So much so he went from 16+m to 19+m from season 1 to season 2. He is pretty proven at this point. In 129 his corsi and fenwick are 53 & 53.6 respectively. He also went from 54% Ozone starts to 50% which tells me they have no issues with him whatsoever. They would be better off buying out Backes' or trading him once his real money decreases (7/1).


Grzelcyk is better than Shattenkirk by a lot. Shattenkirk's contract may actually be worse than Backes' & you get a good prospect & Pick? - Bjork, who despite people being low on him (Boston fans) has made the team for two years out of camp and was paired with Bergeron and Marchand. He just can't stay healthy. Hopefully that is not the case moving forward...


Best comment I've seen here in a while lol!
17 juin 2019 à 9 h 52
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Still 2 players short and over the cap, I like it applaud
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage