SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Turris Contract Solution

Créé par: Billy739
Équipe: 2019-20 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 27 mai 2019
Publié: 27 mai 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
NSH gets to shed cap without losing Production or Possession as Shaw's one of the best secondary Centers in the league .(not good enough to be full time center but can help a young Center become a top 6 like he did with Danault over 2 years )

MTL can live with Turris cap as he's a consistent bulk faceoff Center which will be key in helping our youth get points. (more possession = more points )

Turris also gives us the option to trade Danault before he goes UFA instead of cashing out on a Payday he's earning. (by then Kotkanemi and Poehling should be top 6 )
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 200 000 $
41 650 000 $
2950 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Turris, Kyle
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NSH)
Détails additionnels:
NSH offloads a 5 year 6 million dollar deal

if NSH buys out Alzner before the final game of the season then their 1st becomes a 2nd in 2020 instead . (remember they are cash strapped to the point Subbans being offered up for Trade by the GM and this gives them an out without sacrifice )
NSH
  1. Alzner, Karl (2 300 000 $ retained)
  2. Shaw, Andrew (1 700 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
NSH takes on Shaw at 2.2m over 3 years
NSH takes on 2.3m over 3 years with Alzner

Alzner fills the role Hamuis barely filled last year as the bottom pair shot block leader. before MTL changed their system on Alzner he had a decade of 100+ hit and blocked shot of which a half Dozen NHL players can claim . At 2.3m he's an upgrade on what you got offering a level of play you wont find for that cap .(plus he is hungry to prove himself and in the physical West he can)

if Alzner doesnt work out NSH buys him out for under 900K a season 1/5th of Turris buyout with 2 years less term .
2.
MTL
  1. Aho, Sebastian
  2. Ho-Sang, Joshua [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
-Untested Quality LD prospect with an A- or B+ ranking.
-A Player who has talent but enough attitude to have both AHL and NHL coaches call him out publicly . A change of system might help Humble him .

Tatar provides immediate impact as he has for us often being a key player in our wins.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de ARI
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
2020
Logo de MTL
Logo de NSH
Logo de MTL
Logo de NYI
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de WPG
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2021
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $70 327 142 $0 $4 050 000 $12 672 858 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
748 333 $748 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
770 000 $770 000 $ (Bonis de performance100 000 $$100K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance175 000 $$175K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai 2019 à 20 h 40
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Modifié 27 mai 2019 à 20 h 46
I think this is a win-win trade. Shaw will be better than Smith on the 2nd line after Arvidsson. Alzner & Shaw will be very cheap.
Turris need to work out in MTL because it will become a really bad trade if he cant keep up. But I believe in him
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2019 à 20 h 52
#2
Gerber14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 48
Mentions "j'aime": 7
I don't see Montreal retaining 4 Million for three years and paying Turris 6 Million on top of that. Montreal would be better off trading Shaw for a left shot D, I like Turris and think he would do well in Montreal but the deal doesn't really make sense to me. Habs are going to be in a cap crunch in two years and this deal will kill them then. I also think Danault will be a longtime member of the Habs and transition into a penalty kill and defense specialist sort of how Plecanec did.
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2019 à 20 h 54
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: Gerber14
I don't see Montreal retaining 4 Million for three years and paying Turris 6 Million on top of that. Montreal would be better off trading Shaw for a left shot D, I like Turris and think he would do well in Montreal but the deal doesn't really make sense to me. Habs are going to be in a cap crunch in two years and this deal will kill them then. I also think Danault will be a longtime member of the Habs and transition into a penalty kill and defense specialist sort of how Plecanec did.


If Poehling can be a Plekanec, Danault will be trade.
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2019 à 21 h 4
#4
Démarrer sujet
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: Gerber14
I don't see Montreal retaining 4 Million for three years and paying Turris 6 Million on top of that. Montreal would be better off trading Shaw for a left shot D, I like Turris and think he would do well in Montreal but the deal doesn't really make sense to me. Habs are going to be in a cap crunch in two years and this deal will kill them then. I also think Danault will be a longtime member of the Habs and transition into a penalty kill and defense specialist sort of how Plecanec did.


its why the 1st was included

i've been a Danault guy since his QMJHL days and one of the few who supported MB when he traded for him as i knew his potential and ultimately with KK and RP here the tough question has to be asked .

is Danault willing to play 3rd line longterm ?
my guess given i met him and talked to him often when he played her is No he wont .
Turris fits our third line Bulk Center needs and honestly it'll be 2024 before we're facing tough cap decisions so even if you're worried about that in the final year we can just move him out .

Faceoff Centers of Turris Consistency last a long time because Playoff teams like PIT have top end talent who needs help with Faceoff wins creating a job for a Matt Cullen or a Jay Beagle as they age . Turris in MTL just has to win faceoffs to help our youth as we are experiencing a large influx of youth which will need help there first few years developing consistency .

Danault is Superior to Plekanec which is why letting him waste away in bottom 6 wont be an option as its Unlikely he'll re-sign knowing that's his future .
Danault took the long road overcoming hurtle's to get to where he is and by the time he's UFA he'll be looking to cash in on that


Besides Signing Domi and Gallagher longterm is the only option
Danault will make more then Turris by the time he's UFA so this allows MTL to get payed while avoiding paying more in a UFA bidding competition .
Bergevin a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2019 à 21 h 8
#5
Démarrer sujet
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: Bergevin
If Poehling can be a Plekanec, Danault will be trade.


Poehlings the first Power Center with Skill we've had since Damphousse .
he's got a reputation for his Defense because of his conditioning being effected unknowingly by an airway obstruction St Cloud Team doctors found and fixed.
since his surgery he's been on a Surge leading one of the top 2 NCAA teams all year , Leading the World Jr Tournament and Scoring 3 Goals and a OT winner no less his first game .

if he had this surgery a year before his draft and had the chance to showcase his complete game i think he woulda went top 10 overall as his ability to properly breathe has given the big man more energy and stamina
Bergevin a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2019 à 21 h 15
#6
Islanders Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 7,840
Mentions "j'aime": 2,761
Different take on a Tatar to Isles trade. I like it a lot. Nicely done
27 mai 2019 à 21 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: Billy739
its why the 1st was included

i've been a Danault guy since his QMJHL days and one of the few who supported MB when he traded for him as i knew his potential and ultimately with KK and RP here the tough question has to be asked .

is Danault willing to play 3rd line longterm ?
my guess given i met him and talked to him often when he played her is No he wont .
Turris fits our third line Bulk Center needs and honestly it'll be 2024 before we're facing tough cap decisions so even if you're worried about that in the final year we can just move him out .

Faceoff Centers of Turris Consistency last a long time because Playoff teams like PIT have top end talent who needs help with Faceoff wins creating a job for a Matt Cullen or a Jay Beagle as they age . Turris in MTL just has to win faceoffs to help our youth as we are experiencing a large influx of youth which will need help there first few years developing consistency .

Danault is Superior to Plekanec which is why letting him waste away in bottom 6 wont be an option as its Unlikely he'll re-sign knowing that's his future .
Danault took the long road overcoming hurtle's to get to where he is and by the time he's UFA he'll be looking to cash in on that


Besides Signing Domi and Gallagher longterm is the only option
Danault will make more then Turris by the time he's UFA so this allows MTL to get payed while avoiding paying more in a UFA bidding competition .


Danault better than Plekanec ? Not sure. Pleky score 29 goals a season, record a 69 & 70 points seasons. I dont think Danault have this offensive upside, but will be as good or better than Pleky defensively.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage