SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Callahan

Créé par: Sabres1973
Équipe: 2019-20 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 20 mai 2019
Publié: 20 mai 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2725 000 $
1900 000 $
42 800 000 $
4750 000 $
1750 000 $
41 600 000 $
41 600 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
88 250 000 $
66 700 000 $
24 500 000 $
3700 000 $
3700 000 $
3700 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Callahan, Ryan
  2. Cirelli, Anthony
  3. Miller, J.T.
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (TBL)
TBL
  1. Ristolainen, Rasmus
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (STL)
2.
BUF
    Gone to khl
    3.
    OTT
    1. Oglevie, Andrew
    2. Okposo, Kyle (2 000 000 $ retained)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2019
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de BUF
    2020
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de DAL
    2021
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2283 000 000 $75 725 833 $0 $4 865 000 $7 274 167 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    6 700 000 $6 700 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    728 333 $728 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
    5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    3 387 500 $3 387 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    812 500 $812 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    20 mai 2019 à 22 h 41
    #1
    buffalofan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 1,264
    Mentions "j'aime": 172
    why do people think Sobotka can magically go to KHL after being traded to different team? not just you who does this i see it on almost every buffalo post
    GMTD a aimé ceci.
    20 mai 2019 à 22 h 42
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 556
    Mentions "j'aime": 108
    Quoting: jonnymc26
    why do people think Sobotka can magically go to KHL after being traded to different team? not just you who does this i see it on almost every buffalo post


    I just want him gone. I would buy him out or try to trade him.
    GMTD a aimé ceci.
    20 mai 2019 à 22 h 44
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2018
    Messages: 1,301
    Mentions "j'aime": 260
    Tampa likes defenceman who are offensive but can also play D. Risto was a -40 last year. I don't care what team you're on that's terrible! Even though they get a 2nd too and you take Callahan's contract on you're not getting one of their top young prospects, a good 2nd line player, and a 1st
    Risto + 2nd = Miller + Callahan + 1st
    Leave out Cirreli
    20 mai 2019 à 22 h 44
    #4
    buffalofan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 1,264
    Mentions "j'aime": 172
    Quoting: Sabres1973
    I just want him gone. I would buy him out or try to trade him.


    fair,tho i dont see any team biting on taking him for future considerations
    GMTD a aimé ceci.
    20 mai 2019 à 22 h 48
    #5
    buffalofan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 1,264
    Mentions "j'aime": 172
    Quoting: MTLFAN27
    Tampa likes defenceman who are offensive but can also play D. Risto was a -40 last year. I don't care what team you're on that's terrible! Even though they get a 2nd too and you take Callahan's contract on you're not getting one of their top young prospects, a good 2nd line player, and a 1st
    Risto + 2nd = Miller + Callahan + 1st
    Leave out Cirreli


    lemme fix that formula
    Risto +2nd= Cirelli + (Miller + Callahan)/Point +1st

    sabers dont get point but tbl get to afford him
    Sabres1973 et GMTD a aimé ceci.
    20 mai 2019 à 22 h 55
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 556
    Mentions "j'aime": 108
    Quoting: jonnymc26
    lemme fix that formula
    Risto +2nd= Cirelli + (Miller + Callahan)/Point +1st

    sabers dont get point but tbl get to afford him


    My point exactly. We are doing you a huge favor clearing enough space so you can sign point. It’s a big price to pay but we need to be compensated for that. Right d are extremely hard to come by and Ristolainen will be better with a better team around him and needs a change of seenery.
    GMTD a aimé ceci.
    21 mai 2019 à 0 h 3
    #7
    thewookie1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 2,461
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,036
    Unwilling to trade Risto in-division
    21 mai 2019 à 3 h 48
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 1,304
    Mentions "j'aime": 538
    Looool how could you even think that Tampa gets rid of Cirellitears of joy
    21 mai 2019 à 8 h 13
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2018
    Messages: 1,679
    Mentions "j'aime": 381
    No way we trade Cirelli, nt tho
    Zwui21 a aimé ceci.
    21 mai 2019 à 8 h 29
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 4,928
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
    If Botterill could get that kind of return for Risto, that would be a huge win, but I doubt Tampa does it.
    GMTD a aimé ceci.
    21 mai 2019 à 8 h 59
    #11
    Eichel Tower
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 4,716
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,441
    At the TDL there were similar trades and I immediately thought that there was now way BriseBois would give up that much for Ristolainen. Lately, I have seen several trade for Miller or Callahan. Miller (13 goals and a $5,250,000 cap is approaching cap dump status) is traded for a 2nd or 2nd and 3rd rarely for 2 2nds. Callahan has been moved by adding as much as a 1st but most observers settle on a 2nd and 3rd (because for a team as the Sabres that is only a few steps ahead of our 3rd and 4th). So if one adds up the value of Miller plus the cost to Callahan one gets Miller + Callahan = 2nd or 3rd or in the worse case future considerations, so breaking down this trade Miller + Callahan = STL 2020 2nd is about correct.
    That leaves Cirelli, Anthony + 2019 1st round pick (TBL) for Ristolainen. That 2019 first is nearly a second (only nine rounds before Buffalo's 2nd). I will not discuss the value of Cirelli but IMO another piece needs to added to TBL 2019 1st. Maybe Cirelli is too much, maybe another roster player would be better, but other than Cirelli I do not see any player that Betterall would want (certainly not Palat).
    I would appreciate any feedback.

    Quoting: MTLFAN27
    Tampa likes defenceman who are offensive but can also play D. Risto was a -40 last year. I don't care what team you're on that's terrible! Even though they get a 2nd too and you take Callahan's contract on you're not getting one of their top young prospects, a good 2nd line player, and a 1st
    Risto + 2nd = Miller + Callahan + 1st
    Leave out Cirreli

    See above, not nearly enough for Ristolainen, leave out the STL 2nd then add something from TBL.
    Quoting: jonnymc26
    lemme fix that formula
    Risto +2nd= Cirelli + (Miller + Callahan)/Point +1st

    sabers dont get point but tbl get to afford him

    Exactly, see above.
    Quoting: matulix
    No way we trade Cirelli, nt tho

    NP, but TBL needs to add a good piece going to Buffalo.
    Quoting: Cheesesauce
    If Botterill could get that kind of return for Risto, that would be a huge win, but I doubt Tampa does it.

    I once thought the same, but Betterall does not need to trade Ristolainen, especially with Bogosian recovering from Surgery.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    21 mai 2019 à 9 h 5
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 4,928
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,670
    Quoting: GMTD
    I once thought the same, but Betterall does not need to trade Ristolainen, especially with Bogosian recovering from Surgery.


    I don't see any problem with that. Risto is not our #1 D, he is not even our best defender after Dahlin. If Botterill can sign or trade for another RHD, why don't we trade Risto?
    21 mai 2019 à 9 h 27
    #13
    Eichel Tower
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 4,716
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,441
    Quoting: Cheesesauce
    I don't see any problem with that. Risto is not our #1 D, he is not even our best defender after Dahlin. If Botterill can sign or trade for another RHD, why don't we trade Risto?


    I just reread my comment, it appears I was disagreeing with you, which I was not. I should have said, I would have thought the trade above was a gross over payment for Ristolainen, but now I do not.
    Yes trade, but not give him away for Tampa's first as suggested by many. I would do the trade proposed, I think it is fair, actually not much more than Montour.
    SalamiCheese et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage