SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hawks possible roster

Créé par: bigmikewall
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 7 mai 2019
Publié: 7 mai 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The Pysyk trade is a short term cap dump that allows the hawks to transition any defensive needs.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 250 000 $
44 250 000 $
21 650 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Pysyk, Mark
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2019 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Anisimov, Artem
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CHI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $62 413 461 $0 $5 782 500 $21 086 539 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 733 333 $2 733 333 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 mai 2019 à 16 h 35
#1
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,189
Mentions "j'aime": 20,506
I like this, there's still money left for Strome and DeBrincat
bigmikewall a aimé ceci.
7 mai 2019 à 17 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,287
Mentions "j'aime": 9,722
Why would we do this? You basically are paying a lot for a 1 year rental. Anisimov is not a cap dump; he has value and certainly with Coach Q in Florida. He's a 3rd round pick all day so essentially you are giving up (2) 3rd round picks and a 4th rounder for a 1 year rental of Pysyk; especially when he is useless to the Hawks next year with Boqvist and Mitchell being ready on the right? This makes no sense.

What also makes no sense is Seabs on the 1st line; that's horrible no other way to say it. Jokiharju or Gus should be on the 1st line with Keith and Seabs on the 3rd line. Also, Caggs is not a 1st liner...on 25 teams in the NHL he is nothing more then a 3rd or 4th liner. Dzingel or Saad are much better options up there. Kahun is not getting benched and Kampf isn't bad but he's really a 4C. If you move Anisimov, you need to find a 3C and there are options like trading for Haula in Vegas.
7 mai 2019 à 18 h 44
#3
Démarrer sujet
bigmikewall
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 167
Mentions "j'aime": 36
First off, a member of the Hawks Player Development has stated that there is a good chance Boqvist will not play as much in the NHL next year (around 20 games) depending on play. My source is the Blackhawk Talk Podcast on Spotify, literally look it up. Mitchell is in the NCAA for another season and possibly his senior year. Anisimov is on a down year and getting older his value is not the same as it was a year ago, plus with the amount of centre depth in the NHL you'll be lucky to find a team that needs him, Panthers don't need him but would be happy to have him for the right price, you forget Dale Tallon is the GM of the panthers not some idiot. Caggs is a first liner because that's the line he played on for a part of the season, they can move pieces around dude. I am not the goddamn GM or the coach, the lines can move based on the preferences of Colliton. THIS IS JUST A POSSIBLE ROSTER WITH POSSIBLE PAIRINGS BUD. Kahun isn't that good can play 3rd or 4th line duties that's it, bottom 6 at full potential. Oh I also signed Tyler Ennis who can play the third line once he has integrated into the system.
7 mai 2019 à 18 h 46
#4
Démarrer sujet
bigmikewall
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 167
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: SevenLeg
I like this, there's still money left for Strome and DeBrincat


Exactly what I was going for, get some nice pieces, keep it simple, but save it for those two next year and some of the defenseman in the future
SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
7 mai 2019 à 20 h 53
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,287
Mentions "j'aime": 9,722
Modifié 7 mai 2019 à 21 h 3
Quoting: bigmikewall
First off, a member of the Hawks Player Development has stated that there is a good chance Boqvist will not play as much in the NHL next year (around 20 games) depending on play. My source is the Blackhawk Talk Podcast on Spotify, literally look it up. Mitchell is in the NCAA for another season and possibly his senior year. Anisimov is on a down year and getting older his value is not the same as it was a year ago, plus with the amount of centre depth in the NHL you'll be lucky to find a team that needs him, Panthers don't need him but would be happy to have him for the right price, you forget Dale Tallon is the GM of the panthers not some idiot. Caggs is a first liner because that's the line he played on for a part of the season, they can move pieces around dude. I am not the goddamn GM or the coach, the lines can move based on the preferences of Colliton. THIS IS JUST A POSSIBLE ROSTER WITH POSSIBLE PAIRINGS BUD. Kahun isn't that good can play 3rd or 4th line duties that's it, bottom 6 at full potential. Oh I also signed Tyler Ennis who can play the third line once he has integrated into the system.


When you reply, hit the blue button "quote" so we know who you're replying to and that person gets a notification they received a reply. Second, relax...writing in caps and using "dude" and "bud" cynically and stating you're not the "goddamn GM or coach" isn't going to fly well around here; these aren't yahoo news forums where people pick fights. When you post on here, you are going to get constructive criticism but it's all in good spirit because we love hockey, it's not personal so don't take it as such.

Kahun was a rookie who played his first game on North American ice in a Hawks sweater. He did admirably well being a rookie on a different sheet. There's a pretty good reason he was able to stay in the lineup more then Perlini or Sikura as an example; because he's better then both guys. 100% true that Boqvist and Mitchell aren't playing next season but they will the following season so trading Anisimov plus a 3rd and 4th to get a guy you'll only use 1 year is somewhat foolish, unless this is a cup team which clearly it's not...I'd argue it's a first round exit team. Anisimov is worth a 3rd round pick and there are teams that need an experienced big body 3C/3LW who puts up 15+ goals for the 2 years left on his contract; Florida is one and Buffalo is another off of the top of my head. CBJ may be another given the exodus of players. Trading him plus picks for a guy that we throw away in a year just doesn't make sense when we should be getting assets back towards the future. Caggs filled a void because we didn't have a lot of options. Sikura, Perlini and Kahun all also played that role on the 1st line. What does that tell you; Hawks don't have anyone that should be playing the 1LW which is their biggest hole IMO on the current roster given the young D prospects that are only a year away. Like I said, on 25+ teams, Caggs would be a 3rd or 4th liner; only on the Hawks would be a 1st liner. That said, I like him a lot as a player just swap him with Dzingel. As for podcasts, I listen to a couple of the Hawks ones; Pat Boyle's comments I take with a grain of salt...I like the guy and he's a great moderator but his ideas are off the wall to stimulate discussion and a lot just make zero sense.
Petrock83 et BankersBox a aimé ceci.
8 mai 2019 à 11 h 4
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 525
Mentions "j'aime": 244
No Ryan Dzingel, go look at his stats comparing his time with Ottawa to Columbus. Ottawa by default based on their roster he played top 6, top 6 = more ice time and more scoring opportunities. When he went to Columbus and slotted correctly he wasn't the same player.
8 mai 2019 à 21 h 44
#7
Démarrer sujet
bigmikewall
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 167
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: ChiHawk
When you reply, hit the blue button "quote" so we know who you're replying to and that person gets a notification they received a reply. Second, relax...writing in caps and using "dude" and "bud" cynically and stating you're not the "goddamn GM or coach" isn't going to fly well around here; these aren't yahoo news forums where people pick fights. When you post on here, you are going to get constructive criticism but it's all in good spirit because we love hockey, it's not personal so don't take it as such.

Kahun was a rookie who played his first game on North American ice in a Hawks sweater. He did admirably well being a rookie on a different sheet. There's a pretty good reason he was able to stay in the lineup more then Perlini or Sikura as an example; because he's better then both guys. 100% true that Boqvist and Mitchell aren't playing next season but they will the following season so trading Anisimov plus a 3rd and 4th to get a guy you'll only use 1 year is somewhat foolish, unless this is a cup team which clearly it's not...I'd argue it's a first round exit team. Anisimov is worth a 3rd round pick and there are teams that need an experienced big body 3C/3LW who puts up 15+ goals for the 2 years left on his contract; Florida is one and Buffalo is another off of the top of my head. CBJ may be another given the exodus of players. Trading him plus picks for a guy that we throw away in a year just doesn't make sense when we should be getting assets back towards the future. Caggs filled a void because we didn't have a lot of options. Sikura, Perlini and Kahun all also played that role on the 1st line. What does that tell you; Hawks don't have anyone that should be playing the 1LW which is their biggest hole IMO on the current roster given the young D prospects that are only a year away. Like I said, on 25+ teams, Caggs would be a 3rd or 4th liner; only on the Hawks would be a 1st liner. That said, I like him a lot as a player just swap him with Dzingel. As for podcasts, I listen to a couple of the Hawks ones; Pat Boyle's comments I take with a grain of salt...I like the guy and he's a great moderator but his ideas are off the wall to stimulate discussion and a lot just make zero sense.


k bro dudeski
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage