SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The only way Gardiner comes back

Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 4 mai 2019
Publié: 4 mai 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If Gardiner's back scares off teams, he may want to sign a small 1 year deal to stay in a place that will help him get healthy and build his value back up.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
710 125 000 $
12 250 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 500 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (NYI)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 000 000 $77 059 699 $0 $850 000 $5 940 301 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 125 000 $10 125 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 mai 2019 à 0 h 36
#1
Preds2929
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 5
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Nashville, also in a cap crunch, trading their 2nd best prospect for a 3rd line C making 4.5 mil a year? No way. They already have a 3 C making too much.
4 mai 2019 à 0 h 37
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: jyoung29
Nashville, also in a cap crunch, trading their 2nd best prospect for a 3rd line C making 4.5 mil a year? No way. They already have a 3 C making too much.


Make it a 3 way trade where you move out Turris. Now you have a huge upgrade over Turris and 2 million in cap space.
4 mai 2019 à 0 h 39
#3
Meme Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,081
Mentions "j'aime": 229
No way Marner, Kapanen and Gardiner leave that much money on the table. All will get around 2mil more
4 mai 2019 à 0 h 45
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,493
Mentions "j'aime": 1,562
Modifié 4 mai 2019 à 0 h 57
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
No way Marner, Kapanen and Gardiner leave that much money on the table. All will get around 2mil more


Can you backup that claim ( and all the other gloaters here ) with League comparables or are you ( and all the other gloaters here ) owning crystal ball ?

Quoting: LoganOllivier
Make it a 3 way trade where you move out Turris. Now you have a huge upgrade over Turris and 2 million in cap space.


I think smarter idea would be to target CAR with all their surplus on RHD. I was against Faulk trades at the start of the Season, but with recent turn in Kadri career, i would even take him into trade talks.....
4 mai 2019 à 0 h 51
#5
Preds2929
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 5
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: LoganOllivier
Make it a 3 way trade where you move out Turris. Now you have a huge upgrade over Turris and 2 million in cap space.


Soooo you want the Leafs to absorb $6 mil against the cap?.. I see where you are going, but the Leafs cannot do that and I think Poille is kinda up Fabbro's butt since the kid grew up a Preds fan. I feel like draft picks are going to go when giving up Turris, rather than Fabbro (or Tolvanen). Ekholm going to TOR seems more feasible, but Kadri is not going to be the focal point for the return.
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 14
#6
Meme Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,081
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Quoting: Laudan
Can you backup that claim ( and all the other gloaters here ) with League comparables or are you ( and all the other gloaters here ) owning crystal ball ?


You want facts? here you go:

Marner: 21Yrs Old ; 26G 68A 94PTS in 82 games
Comparable at that age: Kane 2009-10 and got $10.5M x 8yrs (14.7% of cap) so that prorated to today would be equivalent to $12.2M so $11.5 would be safe bet for him.

Gardiner: Is a T4 dman on most teams. The AVERAGE salary for a top4 dman in the nhl right now is around $4M (prorated to the new $83M ceiling). Since he is a pending UFA he'll get more cause thats how free agency works

Kapanen 22yrs old; G20 A24 PTS44 in 78GP
Comparables: JVR (actually did worse) and signed for 4.25M x 6yrs. Prorated to the current cap and that would be = 5.8M so im pretty sure $4M would be a conservative for Kapanen.

When you do the math, the contracts presented on this post just don't make sense from the players perspective. No need for a crystal ball when you actually put in minimal effort and actually look at the facts that are readily available to analyze. Best to do some due diligence before making claims. Not gloating just stating facts objectively.
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 16
#7
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
No way Marner, Kapanen and Gardiner leave that much money on the table. All will get around 2mil more


And not a whisper about Mango. This is how I will be judging whether or not a person knows anthyhing about the players they are talking about from now on.
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 23
#8
Meme Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,081
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Quoting: Jamiepo
And not a whisper about Mango. This is how I will be judging whether or not a person knows anthyhing about the players they are talking about from now on.


well this post is focused on keeping Gardiner. If you look above, Ive already shown that itd be almost impossible to resign Gardiner. How do you think they'd be able to sign Mango then?
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 23
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,493
Mentions "j'aime": 1,562
Modifié 4 mai 2019 à 3 h 36
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
You want facts? here you go:

Marner: 21Yrs Old ; 26G 68A 94PTS in 82 games
Comparable at that age: Kane 2009-10 and got $10.5M x 8yrs (14.7% of cap) so that prorated to today would be equivalent to $12.2M so $11.5 would be safe bet for him.

Gardiner: Is a T4 dman on most teams. The AVERAGE salary for a top4 dman in the nhl right now is around $4M (prorated to the new $83M ceiling). Since he is a pending UFA he'll get more cause thats how free agency works

Kapanen 22yrs old; G20 A24 PTS44 in 78GP
Comparables: JVR (actually did worse) and signed for 4.25M x 6yrs. Prorated to the current cap and that would be = 5.8M so im pretty sure $4M would be a conservative for Kapanen.

When you do the math, the contracts presented on this post just don't make sense from the players perspective. No need for a crystal ball when you actually put in minimal effort and actually look at the facts that are readily available to analyze. Best to do some due diligence before making claims. Not gloating just stating facts objectively.


Marner.....$$ / Term

Kapanen ( 9 + 44 )........Hyman.........( 6 + 28 ) = 4 x 2,25M.....Brown ( 6 + 36 ) = 3 x 2,1M

Johnsson ( 3 + 43 ).......Hyman.........( 6 + 28 ) = 4 x 2,25M.....Brown ( 6 + 36 ) = 3 x 2,1M

Gardiner - read the description Op posted why the money as its written
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 26
#10
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
You want facts? here you go:

Marner: 21Yrs Old ; 26G 68A 94PTS in 82 games
Comparable at that age: Kane 2009-10 and got $10.5M x 8yrs (14.7% of cap) so that prorated to today would be equivalent to $12.2M so $11.5 would be safe bet for him.

Gardiner: Is a T4 dman on most teams. The AVERAGE salary for a top4 dman in the nhl right now is around $4M (prorated to the new $83M ceiling). Since he is a pending UFA he'll get more cause thats how free agency works

Kapanen 22yrs old; G20 A24 PTS44 in 78GP
Comparables: JVR (actually did worse) and signed for 4.25M x 6yrs. Prorated to the current cap and that would be = 5.8M so im pretty sure $4M would be a conservative for Kapanen.

When you do the math, the contracts presented on this post just don't make sense from the players perspective. No need for a crystal ball when you actually put in minimal effort and actually look at the facts that are readily available to analyze. Best to do some due diligence before making claims. Not gloating just stating facts objectively.


Wow... I would have agreed that players deserve more but this post really made you look foolish.

Kane’s first deal was 11% @ 5 years.

There are about 10 very good comparables for kapanen on bridge deals but for some stupid reason you go back to JVR from 8 years ago on a long term deal,

You also completely missed the explanation. Before you start complaining to people to conform to your crooked sense of math you should learn English and do some reading. As far fetched as it sounds he was talking about Gardiner back injury being a contract issue next year.

Please come up with proper comparables. Players who match experience, performance and term. Otherwise you just look like someone who doesn’t have a clue. I’m sure you can find some comparables to back up your arguments. Even if they are outliers. But these... are NOT it.
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 27
#11
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
well this post is focused on keeping Gardiner. If you look above, Ive already shown that itd be almost impossible to resign Gardiner. How do you think they'd be able to sign Mango then?


He just did... and you agreed with the contract... case closed. The good news is kappy is probably worth less. Equal at best. So that kinda blows up your whole point.
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 30
#12
Meme Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,081
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Quoting: Laudan
Marner.....$$ / Term

Kapanen ( 9 + 44 )........Hyman.........( 6 + 28 ) = 4 x 2,25.....Brown ( 6 + 36 ) = 3 x 2,1M

Johnsson ( 3 + 43 ).......Hyman.........( 6 + 28 ) = 4 x 2,25.....Brown ( 6 + 36 ) = 3 x 2,1M

Gardiner - read the description Op posted why the money as its written


Look at the stats for yourself. The contracts that Ive suggested statistically make sense when using comparables, which is exactly how player agents negotiate contracts for their clients. Also Gardiner is a top4 dman under 30. There are probably at the very least 10 or so teams that'd be happy to sign him for about 4M in Free Agency that are looking for a dman. The chances of nobody being interested in a UFA like Gardiner for that price are astronomically small.
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 32
#13
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
Look at the stats for yourself. The contracts that Ive suggested statistically make sense when using comparables, which is exactly how player agents negotiate contracts for their clients. Also Gardiner is a top4 dman under 30. There are probably at the very least 10 or so teams that'd be happy to sign him for about 4M in Free Agency that are looking for a dman. The chances of nobody being interested in a UFA like Gardiner for that price are astronomically small.


Read my post above, you are just making yourself look even more dumb.
You are comparing completely wrong contract types and terms
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 36
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,493
Mentions "j'aime": 1,562
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
Look at the stats for yourself. The contracts that Ive suggested statistically make sense when using comparables, which is exactly how player agents negotiate contracts for their clients. Also Gardiner is a top4 dman under 30. There are probably at the very least 10 or so teams that'd be happy to sign him for about 4M in Free Agency that are looking for a dman. The chances of nobody being interested in a UFA like Gardiner for that price are astronomically small.


Quoting: LoganOllivier
Team Explanation.....If Gardiner's back scares off teams, he may want to sign a small 1 year deal to stay in a place that will help him get healthy and build his value back up.


Thats for Gardiner explained....its in thread explanation, otherwise i defenitelly agree with you....he will be 6 x 6M at least, but again...as you are ignoring $$ / Term for Gardiner, same you are doing for Marner, Kapanen and Johnsson.....as 80% of ppl on this side do. Those two things always go hand in hand.
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 51
#15
Meme Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,081
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Modifié 4 mai 2019 à 1 h 57
Quoting: Jamiepo
Wow... I would have agreed that players deserve more but this post really made you look foolish.

Kane’s first deal was 11% @ 5 years.

There are about 10 very good comparables for kapanen on bridge deals but for some stupid reason you go back to JVR from 8 years ago on a long term deal,

You also completely missed the explanation. Before you start complaining to people to conform to your crooked sense of math you should learn English and do some reading. As far fetched as it sounds he was talking about Gardiner back injury being a contract issue next year.

Please come up with proper comparables. Players who match experience, performance and term. Otherwise you just look like someone who doesn’t have a clue. I’m sure you can find some comparables to back up your arguments. Even if they are outliers. But these... are NOT it.


I understand that the math for Kane is a mistake. Ill own up to that. Still think that Mathews getting 11.6M will not help in Toronto's contract negotiations with Marner's agent. But the comparables make sense for kapanen. But, if you want one thats more leafs fan friendly look at hertl and he got a 3M bridge deal in 15-16 which prorates to around 3.5M so Im sure Kapanen's agent will push to 4,000,000 to threaten a possible offersheet to get extra money. As for Gardiner's health issues, it just gives incentive then for teams in free agency to shave 500k from their original offer if he wasnt hurt. Still would be higher than what Toronto is willing to pay him as he isnt as big of a priority to sign as some of their other expiring contracts.

No need to get so riled up over one math error. Have a tea and relax. There are many ways that Marner's agent can logically get him 11+.
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 54
#16
Meme Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,081
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Quoting: Laudan
Thats for Gardiner explained....its in thread explanation, otherwise i defenitelly agree with you....he will be 6 x 6M at least, but again...as you are ignoring $$ / Term for Gardiner, same you are doing for Marner, Kapanen and Johnsson.....as 80% of ppl on this side do. Those two things always go hand in hand.


I still see Gardiner getting alot more in free agency than taking a 1yr deal in Toronto even with his health issues. Free Agency is stupid like that. Teams throw logic out the window and overpay for anything that has the potential to "boldster" their lineups
4 mai 2019 à 1 h 56
#17
93in93
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 160
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Modifié 4 mai 2019 à 2 h 2
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
No way Marner, Kapanen and Gardiner leave that much money on the table. All will get around 2mil more


So Marner's going to become the 2nd highest player in the league ? Yeah, that's not happening
4 mai 2019 à 2 h 4
#18
Meme Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,081
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Quoting: ninetythreein93
So Marner's going to become the 2nd highest player in the league and Kapanen's going to parlay a 44 point season into $4.5M ? Yeah, that's not happening


Kapanen can easily drive his price up to 4 cause of having a bargaining chip (threat of an offersheet) which toronto probably can't afford once marner is signed. The marleau contract has backfired this quickly. just a poorly timed signing. As for Marner, he is proving to be just as good as Tavares and Mathews and with both of them getting over 11mil, its safe to say Marner will be looking for around the same
4 mai 2019 à 2 h 9
#19
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Modifié 4 mai 2019 à 2 h 15
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
I understand that the math for Kane is a mistake. Ill own up to that. Still think that Mathews getting 11.6M will not help in Toronto's contract negotiations with Marner's agent. But the comparables make sense for kapanen. But, if you want one thats more leafs fan friendly look at hertl and he got a 3M bridge deal in 15-16 which prorates to around 3.5M. As for Gardiner's health issues, it just gives incentive then for teams in free agency to shave 500k from their original offer if he wasnt hurt. Still would be higher than what Toronto is willing to pay him as he isnt as big of a priority to sign as some of their other expiring contracts.

No need to get so riled up over one math error. Have a tea and relax. There are many ways that Marner's agent can logically get him 11+.


Proper comparables for kappy

Teravainen
Tierney
Bjorkstrand
Brown
Hyman

Even with these players most have a better history of production. If you count his entire elc his comparables drop dramatically.

One math error? After you told the OP to do math lol.

You used JVR’s 6 year deal from nearly a decade ago as a comparable for a kapanen 2 year deal lol.
4 mai 2019 à 2 h 31
#20
Meme Enthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 1,081
Mentions "j'aime": 229
Quoting: Jamiepo
Proper comparables for kappy

Teravainen
Tierney
Bjorkstrand
Brown
Hyman

Teravianen: signed for 2.86M x 2 (prorated to 3.2M) at the same age. He's the definition of a bargain since he netted 76 points this year and only getting paid 5.8 nxt yr
Tierny: signed 2.9M after having a lower P/G. than what kappy has now and he was a year old when he did that. So close comaparable here
Bjorkstrand: Kapanen has better P/G, is younger and has a higher upside especially playing with either mathews or pajama boy
Brown: Way worse than kapanen, not a close comparable here at all
Hyman: signed 2.25M after only having 28pts. Leafs are fortunate that hes developed nicely in the last couple of years.

Youve pointed out a solid comparable in Tierny. However you forget about Kappy's main bargaining chip which is the threat of an offersheet. Teams are surely willing to pay extra to offersheet him for a 2nd rnd pick as he is a young winger with speed and a pretty high ceiling. The threat of an offersheet is why toronto either overpays for him or he goes to another team willing to pay much more
4 mai 2019 à 8 h 29
#21
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
No way Marner, Kapanen and Gardiner leave that much money on the table. All will get around 2mil more


Marner isn't going to get more than Matthews, he won't get as much as Matthews. Kap doesn't deserve more than this, he has 1 year of service and disappeared in the 2nd half. He needs a show me year to get a big contract.

As for Gardiner, read the description.
4 mai 2019 à 8 h 31
#22
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: jyoung29
Soooo you want the Leafs to absorb $6 mil against the cap?.. I see where you are going, but the Leafs cannot do that and I think Poille is kinda up Fabbro's butt since the kid grew up a Preds fan. I feel like draft picks are going to go when giving up Turris, rather than Fabbro (or Tolvanen). Ekholm going to TOR seems more feasible, but Kadri is not going to be the focal point for the return.


Nashville is in trouble, they need to clear out some bad contracts and if they could send Fabro to TO, Turris to anyone who needs cap dollars and get Kadri, that would be a deadly move. Kadri would be a much better 2C for you guys than Turris and you'd save space.
4 mai 2019 à 8 h 32
#23
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Laudan
Thats for Gardiner explained....its in thread explanation, otherwise i defenitelly agree with you....he will be 6 x 6M at least, but again...as you are ignoring $$ / Term for Gardiner, same you are doing for Marner, Kapanen and Johnsson.....as 80% of ppl on this side do. Those two things always go hand in hand.


I don't understand what you are saying here.
4 mai 2019 à 9 h 14
#24
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
Teravianen: signed for 2.86M x 2 (prorated to 3.2M) at the same age. He's the definition of a bargain since he netted 76 points this year and only getting paid 5.8 nxt yr
Tierny: signed 2.9M after having a lower P/G. than what kappy has now and he was a year old when he did that. So close comaparable here
Bjorkstrand: Kapanen has better P/G, is younger and has a higher upside especially playing with either mathews or pajama boy
Brown: Way worse than kapanen, not a close comparable here at all
Hyman: signed 2.25M after only having 28pts. Leafs are fortunate that hes developed nicely in the last couple of years.

Youve pointed out a solid comparable in Tierny. However you forget about Kappy's main bargaining chip which is the threat of an offersheet. Teams are surely willing to pay extra to offersheet him for a 2nd rnd pick as he is a young winger with speed and a pretty high ceiling. The threat of an offersheet is why toronto either overpays for him or he goes to another team willing to pay much more


Kapanen has a ppg of 0.40. I think if you go and evaluate all of the comparables I have listed you will see that kappy falls near the bottom of the list. Great season last year, no doubts there. But he dried right up in the second half. I think the best solution for kappy is a show me deal. If he wants to try and cash in on a good half season he can have another team roll the dice. The leafs can easily trade him.
4 mai 2019 à 9 h 17
#25
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: jjkhairaELTE99
Teravianen: signed for 2.86M x 2 (prorated to 3.2M) at the same age. He's the definition of a bargain since he netted 76 points this year and only getting paid 5.8 nxt yr
Tierny: signed 2.9M after having a lower P/G. than what kappy has now and he was a year old when he did that. So close comaparable here
Bjorkstrand: Kapanen has better P/G, is younger and has a higher upside especially playing with either mathews or pajama boy
Brown: Way worse than kapanen, not a close comparable here at all
Hyman: signed 2.25M after only having 28pts. Leafs are fortunate that hes developed nicely in the last couple of years.

Youve pointed out a solid comparable in Tierny. However you forget about Kappy's main bargaining chip which is the threat of an offersheet. Teams are surely willing to pay extra to offersheet him for a 2nd rnd pick as he is a young winger with speed and a pretty high ceiling. The threat of an offersheet is why toronto either overpays for him or he goes to another team willing to pay much more


The threat of an offer sheet isn't a good bargaining tool for players. If a player is playing hardball because of an offer sheet, then trade him. He now has zero say in where he goes and trying the same stunt with another team is going to kill his reputation. So no players are not using offer sheets as threats.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage