SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kings

Créé par: KINGS67
Équipe: 2019-20 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 8 mars 2019
Publié: 8 mars 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Traded Quick for picks. Signed Panarin. Traded Lewis for pick
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
31 200 000 $
3950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
711 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (OTT)
2.
LAK
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (CAR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
Frais appliqués
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de CAR
2020
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de OTT
Logo de BUF
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2021
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $75 467 615 $0 $632 500 $7 532 385 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
350 000 $350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
900 000 $900 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 893 750 $1 893 750 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
745 000 $745 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
759 167 $759 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 mars 2019 à 17 h 42
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Is this all the Kings are looking for in return for Quick?
8 mars 2019 à 17 h 43
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,722
Mentions "j'aime": 1,656
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Is this all the Kings are looking for in return for Quick?

I think they’ll add a prospect but I’d assume look for a deal close to what Miller got to STL. I really just did the minimum he should get. He’s worth at least 3 picks IMO. Age and cap hit could be an issue but for a team like CAR they need a goalie. I can see them shelling out picks/prospect for Quick
8 mars 2019 à 17 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,702
Mentions "j'aime": 6,208
Kings won't do either of those trades.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
8 mars 2019 à 17 h 48
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,722
Mentions "j'aime": 1,656
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Kings won't do either of those trades.


Purposely low balled the offers. I can see them getting rid of both for picks/prospects. Petersen is ready whether we think so or not. Get something for quick and rebuild. Kings need to try and get Panarin so have to get rid of players. Yes Martinez is another option too
KingsLover a aimé ceci.
8 mars 2019 à 17 h 50
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: KINGS67
I think they’ll add a prospect but I’d assume look for a deal close to what Miller got to STL. I really just did the minimum he should get. He’s worth at least 3 picks IMO. Age and cap hit could be an issue but for a team like CAR they need a goalie. I can see them shelling out picks/prospect for Quick


Fair enough, I think there would definitely be a premium placed in division but I don't see how Calgary doesn't take a crack at the offer, in the grand scheme of things, 5.8 is not a ton of money with the cap constantly increasing. We are currently paying a 36 year old goalie to be mediocre at best we may as well let Quick and Rittich take the reigns for 4-5 years here until one of our AHL guys really steps up to the plate.

Quick
Conditional Pick Round 3 - 5

For

2019 1st
2020 2nd
B level Prospect
Small Cap Dump for Compliance
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
8 mars 2019 à 17 h 52
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,722
Mentions "j'aime": 1,656
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Fair enough, I think there would definitely be a premium placed in division but I don't see how Calgary doesn't take a crack at the offer, in the grand scheme of things, 5.8 is not a ton of money with the cap constantly increasing. We are currently paying a 36 year old goalie to be mediocre at best we may as well let Quick and Rittich take the reigns for 4-5 years here until one of our AHL guys really steps up to the plate.


No 5.8 is not a lot considering what Quick brings to the table. Man if the kings trade with CGY they have to get a top prospect and pick in return ?.
8 mars 2019 à 17 h 53
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 911
Mentions "j'aime": 209
Yoooo where is my boy Alex Iaffalo?? I'd put him on the top line with Kopi and Brown, then Panarin-Carts-Kovy, the Kempe-Kupari-Toff, then Clifford-Brodzy-Wags.
8 mars 2019 à 17 h 54
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,907
Mentions "j'aime": 25,718
Regardless of his figures this year, which are deflated due to the lack of commitment on defense of the players in front of him, Quick is still a world-class goalie, and should achieve a first and an A prospect, if not an actual roster player, at the least. Who do YOU think is more valuable: Jake Muzzin (who is signed for only two years), or Jonathan Quick? Blake obtained a first, a prime prospect plus a second-round unsigned draft pick for MuZz.
KingsGKG a aimé ceci.
8 mars 2019 à 18 h 1
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: KINGS67
No 5.8 is not a lot considering what Quick brings to the table. Man if the kings trade with CGY they have to get a top prospect and pick in return ?.


Hahah I know! I never want to put real prospects in a trade cause we know what they bring to the table, picks I am just so much less attached to! Kylington/Mangiapane/Dube would likely have to be involved.
9 mars 2019 à 0 h 5
#10
GJWKINGS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 593
Mentions "j'aime": 98
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Regardless of his figures this year, which are deflated due to the lack of commitment on defense of the players in front of him, Quick is still a world-class goalie, and should achieve a first and an A prospect, if not an actual roster player, at the least. Who do YOU think is more valuable: Jake Muzzin (who is signed for only two years), or Jonathan Quick? Blake obtained a first, a prime prospect plus a second-round unsigned draft pick for MuZz.


Id like to see a deal with Carolina like this.

Rights to Stelio Mattheos
Rights to Eetu Luostarinen
Jake Bean
2019 2nd (CAR), 2019 2nd (BUF)
2020 2nd.
Scott Darling


For Quick

Thoughts?
9 mars 2019 à 12 h 38
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,722
Mentions "j'aime": 1,656
Quoting: KingsGKG
Id like to see a deal with Carolina like this.

Rights to Stelio Mattheos
Rights to Eetu Luostarinen
Jake Bean
2019 2nd (CAR), 2019 2nd (BUF)
2020 2nd.
Scott Darling


For Quick

Thoughts?


Bean would be a good get
9 mars 2019 à 12 h 38
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,722
Mentions "j'aime": 1,656
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
Hahah I know! I never want to put real prospects in a trade cause we know what they bring to the table, picks I am just so much less attached to! Kylington/Mangiapane/Dube would likely have to be involved.


Kylington would be awesome to get!
9 mars 2019 à 12 h 41
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,722
Mentions "j'aime": 1,656
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Regardless of his figures this year, which are deflated due to the lack of commitment on defense of the players in front of him, Quick is still a world-class goalie, and should achieve a first and an A prospect, if not an actual roster player, at the least. Who do YOU think is more valuable: Jake Muzzin (who is signed for only two years), or Jonathan Quick? Blake obtained a first, a prime prospect plus a second-round unsigned draft pick for MuZz.

Yes I agree. He should get a pretty damn good return. I would love a top prospect in return. His value will be much higher at the draft instead of this past deadline. Multiple teams were asking about quick. There’s definitely a market for him
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
9 mars 2019 à 14 h 25
#14
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,907
Mentions "j'aime": 25,718
Quoting: KINGS67
Bean would be a good get


Wallmark, a first and Bean, or Pesce, a 2019 second and a 2020 second, and the two unsigned prospects would be a minimum for me.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage