Can you explain this trade to me because Bergevin clearly said he isn't going to go all-in, and these moves are going all-in

I'm not Bergevin...

Once again those pieces aren't getting you Andreas Athanasiou. Try any one of Mete or Juulsen for starters and Detroit still probably says no.

Ok... sub out Lindgren for Juulsen... would u do that?

So why are you doing trades that wouldn't happen? The point of Armchair GM is to pretend to be a GM and make realistic trades...

Might be closer? Detroit's like Winnipeg the last thing we need is wingers and goalie prospects we need D help and Juulsen would absolutely be a starter.

How do you know they would not happen? Just like Danault and Romanov for Weise/Fleischman was not supposed to happen either? Or Petry for a 2nd? List goes on...

Ok, Juulsen/Hudon/3rd? (instead of 4th)

Any indication of Juulsens ceiling?

What do you mean, A GM never said they wouldn't trade those players. Chicago was in win-now mode, so of course people knew they were going to make trades to win now. Edmonton was a lottery team so people suspected their pending UFA's were going to be traded. People knew those trades were going to happen...

Ok.. I understand your point. You can disagree to these trades, but you should not say they "are not going to happen". We do not know the future, anything could happen.

Top 4 d-man with 20-35 point potential. Strong and steady, can move the puck quickly, and loves using the body.

ignore larkinisking he's always wrong .

he though tatar was goin to land him a player a pick and multiple prospects and was wrong .

like some fans in MTL overvalue our players , Larkinisking thinks everyone in DET is either untouchable or worth Austin Mathews .

just look at his profile and his histoy of comments , its almost like he doesnt learn from recent Trades and what the market is set at he just talks about tades like its 2007