SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Brassard for Nuge

Créé par: Riddler
Équipe: 2018-19 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 6 janv. 2019
Publié: 8 janv. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
There is no question that Nuge is a valuable player to the Oilers. He is underrated, in my opinion. However, to build a contending roster around Connor, the Oilers need to spread out their salary better. Trust me, you don't want to be like the early 2010s Penguins. Sure they made the playoffs but the roster was carried by Sid, Geno, Tanger, and Fleury. You could argue that a player like Nuge is worth $6million for a contender. Edmonton is not a contender and to become one, they need to start making changes. Trading Hall should have been the drastic change but we know how that turned out. Brassard is only $3million and is a pending ufa. Edmonton can decide what to do with him then. Oleksiak is on pace for 7-9 goals this year, though his shot, if used more, can score some more. The Oilers need goals from other places than their top two lines. Jamie is a good shutdown defender who is a decent skater. Also, he is left handed but plays better on the right side.

So why would Edmonton retain salary on Nuge if this is supposed to be a cap dump? I think, sure it'd be smarter if Edmonton did any other deal that involved no retained salary but unless Maatta is the defenseman in this deal, Pittsburgh needs the retained salary. If Edmonton retains, they can get more back for Nuge. In this deal, on the surface, Edmonton gains no cap space and loses no cap space, but after this season, depending on what they do with Brassard, they save money even with retained salary.

Should Edmonton do this deal? I don't think so if there are obviously better offers but I believe the value is close to fair, it's just the reasoning seems pointless for Edmonton. Look, I just want Nuge on the Pens, alright?

Also, JS Dea is young, depth to sweeten the pot. Edmonton just has to give up Malone who is almost 30 and happens to be related to Ryan Malone so I threw him in. Sue me.

Kassian is another cap dump (yes, his contact matches Oleksiak's retained, though) and provides Pittsburgh a depth player, most likely a harmless healthy scratch at that contract. If the playoffs get rough, this might satisfy some people.

I think it's clear why the Pens would do this deal. Oleksiak won't be needed when Schultz comes back. Dea is another depth forward who probably won't be called up again. Brassard isn't working out and Nuge is obviously a help in scoring and penalty kill. And if there is retained salary for Nuge, then sweet. Also, the Pens are in win now, the first round pick is tradeable. They are good enough at drafting, it just takes players time to develop.

Do I think this is fair? It's close. Should Pitt do this? Yeah. Should Edmonton do this? Depends on the other offers for Nuge. No harm in keeping him either.

Just an idea, don't get too mad. Thanks for taking your time, and have a good day folks.
Transactions
EDM
  1. Brassard, Derick
  2. Dea, Jean-Sébastien
  3. Oleksiak, Jamie (187 500 $ retained)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de BUF
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $73 474 059 $0 $982 500 $6 025 941 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
734 167 $734 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 800 000 $6 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
794 167 $794 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
650 000 $650 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 janv. 2019 à 8 h 13
#1
LeBRONTO_maple_leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 4
Mentions "j'aime": 2
I think the value is fair but I agree that Edmonton should consider other offers. Good explanation and trade, nonetheless
8 janv. 2019 à 8 h 15
#2
Austin Cookie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: LeBRONTOmapleleafs
I think the value is fair but I agree that Edmonton should consider other offers. Good explanation and trade, nonetheless


Agreed. I think if Brassard could be resigned for less than $6 million, than it would be good for Edmonton. I like the Oleksiak fit.
Riddler a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 8 h 38
#3
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Tldr, but after the wheels came off Brass in Pittsburgh, Nugent Hopkins would be a huge upgrade.

I don't see the point for Edmonton, unless you give them some wings so they can make the playoffs, though. Or at least some trade chips to get some wings.
Riddler a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 8 h 56
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: Eli
Tldr, but after the wheels came off Brass in Pittsburgh, Nugent Hopkins would be a huge upgrade.

I don't see the point for Edmonton, unless you give them some wings so they can make the playoffs, though. Or at least some trade chips to get some wings.


Yeah, unfortunately I agree. Ideally, they could flip Brassard or use the cap space in the off-season to sign a winger or two
Eli a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 8 h 56
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: Eli
Tldr, but after the wheels came off Brass in Pittsburgh, Nugent Hopkins would be a huge upgrade.

I don't see the point for Edmonton, unless you give them some wings so they can make the playoffs, though. Or at least some trade chips to get some wings.


Yeah, unfortunately I agree. Ideally, they could flip Brassard or use the cap space in the off-season to sign a winger or two
8 janv. 2019 à 8 h 57
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 23
I don't know why it quoted three times my bad ^
8 janv. 2019 à 9 h 25
#7
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,854
Mentions "j'aime": 10,089
I understand why both Brassard and Nuge are being traded. The hard part IMO from the EDM side is the $3M retained for 2 more years. There are just other options for them where they probably won't have to retain. I do think PIT should trade Brassard @ the TDL regardless of their position. It's not that PIT isn't a not contender. Clearly they are, but I think they (now) have one of the worst farm systems in the NHL. It would be a smart move to get something for Brassard since he's not really helping out this PIT team.
8 janv. 2019 à 9 h 27
#8
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: Riddler
Yeah, unfortunately I agree. Ideally, they could flip Brassard or use the cap space in the off-season to sign a winger or two


I think if you aren't counting on Schultz coming back this year, they could flip him to a rebuilding club for a top line wing. Most Pens builds seem to scratch Maatta this year. He's another good trade chip. Cheap Tall Guy fits Chiarelli's model of a hockey player better than any other GM's, so maybe he frees them up to trade a different defenseman with some value. It's not unworkable, and it's a heck of an upgrade. Good luck. Go Metropolitan Division!
Riddler a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 9 h 47
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,366
Mentions "j'aime": 1,581
Very creative, and value is fair. Good job!
Riddler a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 9 h 59
#10
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,405
Mentions "j'aime": 9,109
0% chance theyre retaining half on RNH, but the idea is fair
8 janv. 2019 à 9 h 59
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: Eli
I think if you aren't counting on Schultz coming back this year, they could flip him to a rebuilding club for a top line wing. Most Pens builds seem to scratch Maatta this year. He's another good trade chip. Cheap Tall Guy fits Chiarelli's model of a hockey player better than any other GM's, so maybe he frees them up to trade a different defenseman with some value. It's not unworkable, and it's a heck of an upgrade. Good luck. Go Metropolitan Division!


Agreed all around and same to you! #Metro4TheCup
Eli a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 9 h 59
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: toque
Very creative, and value is fair. Good job!


Thanks a lot!
8 janv. 2019 à 10 h 0
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: Shibbal18
0% chance theyre retaining half on RNH, but the idea is fair


Yeah that's the unfortunate part. You never know with Chiarelli I guess haha
8 janv. 2019 à 10 h 1
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: exo2769
I understand why both Brassard and Nuge are being traded. The hard part IMO from the EDM side is the $3M retained for 2 more years. There are just other options for them where they probably won't have to retain. I do think PIT should trade Brassard @ the TDL regardless of their position. It's not that PIT isn't a not contender. Clearly they are, but I think they (now) have one of the worst farm systems in the NHL. It would be a smart move to get something for Brassard since he's not really helping out this PIT team.


Agreed on the salary retention. Wishful thinking on my part. You never know, though. Thanks for the comment!
Eli et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 10 h 4
#15
jimmmyg
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 737
Mentions "j'aime": 191
Love it. I think Brass has done really well lately and Pearson-Brassard-Kessel might have been our best line on Sunday against Chicago - but I have loved RNH for some time now and think he would fit in great in PIT. You did a good job of explaining this move and I agree with you on most of it I just think $3m retained is a lot for EDM to swallow. It makes perfect sense capwise for this season, but if they did decide to keep Brassard then it would essentially be whatever his contract is plus another $3m. The compensation is there for the retention for sure I just think $3mil over the next two years is a lot. Easy fix though, just soften the retention to $2m and keep the trade as is, or swap out Dea for Simon (would hate to lose either, honestly).

Kassian would be a decent RW on the 4th line with ZAR and Sheahan too. Never a bad thing to have depth that can hop in and play bottom 6 minutes.
Riddler a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 10 h 8
#16
ComYog
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 641
Mentions "j'aime": 111
I think the issue is gonna be the retention. But it does have promise. I think maybe a Brass Maatta for RNH Kassian works a little better with only 2 retained.
Riddler a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 10 h 18
#17
Who adds what?
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 13,677
Mentions "j'aime": 2,703
Quoting: ComYog
I think the issue is gonna be the retention. But it does have promise. I think maybe a Brass Maatta for RNH Kassian works a little better with only 2 retained.


Yeah, I think the players come out fair, there. As long as all of Edmonton's LHD keep spending half of each season on LTIR and then coming back, they have to build their team as if they have zero cap space, because, when healthy, they have zero cap space, but they also should be interested in an LHD who's been healthy a lot.
Riddler a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 11 h 0
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: jimmmyg
Love it. I think Brass has done really well lately and Pearson-Brassard-Kessel might have been our best line on Sunday against Chicago - but I have loved RNH for some time now and think he would fit in great in PIT. You did a good job of explaining this move and I agree with you on most of it I just think $3m retained is a lot for EDM to swallow. It makes perfect sense capwise for this season, but if they did decide to keep Brassard then it would essentially be whatever his contract is plus another $3m. The compensation is there for the retention for sure I just think $3mil over the next two years is a lot. Easy fix though, just soften the retention to $2m and keep the trade as is, or swap out Dea for Simon (would hate to lose either, honestly).

Kassian would be a decent RW on the 4th line with ZAR and Sheahan too. Never a bad thing to have depth that can hop in and play bottom 6 minutes.


Agree with everything you said. Thanks a lot for the feedback and niceties!
8 janv. 2019 à 11 h 6
#19
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Eli
Tldr, but after the wheels came off Brass in Pittsburgh, Nugent Hopkins would be a huge upgrade.

I don't see the point for Edmonton, unless you give them some wings so they can make the playoffs, though. Or at least some trade chips to get some wings.


He gets 59% of his starts in the Dzone, no power play time, and spent a large part of the year on a line with no help while Malkin played with Pearson and Kessel. What do you want from him, 40 goals?

This team will never get great production from it's 3C because they will always be put in difficult spots to actually make that happen. Unless this team finds a LW they will probably be right back to issues again.

While I like the value of the trade I don't think Edmonton does it. Swallowing 3 mil of cap space for time is a hard thing to swallow.
Eli a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 11 h 6
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,351
Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
Nugent-Hopkins ($3,000,000 retained), Kassian, and Malone for Brassard, Oleksiak ($187,500 retained), Dea, 1st (#25ish)

This seems near equal value without the retention. I don't see enough going back to Edmonton to justify the retention though.

Edmonton will need to retain if they have any chance of moving Lucic... that mean A LOT of dead cap space for them.
Riddler et Eli a aimé ceci.
8 janv. 2019 à 11 h 13
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 113
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: biglite351
Nugent-Hopkins ($3,000,000 retained), Kassian, and Malone for Brassard, Oleksiak ($187,500 retained), Dea, 1st (#25ish)

This seems near equal value without the retention. I don't see enough going back to Edmonton to justify the retention though.

Edmonton will need to retain if they have any chance of moving Lucic... that mean A LOT of dead cap space for them.


Understandable but the retention is for two years and I would be shocked if they manage to move Lucic within that time. However, I'd probably lessen Nuge's retention to $2million as one of the comments suggested
8 janv. 2019 à 12 h 53
#22
ComYog
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 641
Mentions "j'aime": 111
Quoting: biglite351
Nugent-Hopkins ($3,000,000 retained), Kassian, and Malone for Brassard, Oleksiak ($187,500 retained), Dea, 1st (#25ish)

This seems near equal value without the retention. I don't see enough going back to Edmonton to justify the retention though.

Edmonton will need to retain if they have any chance of moving Lucic... that mean A LOT of dead cap space for them.


Lucic will only be moved as an when the next set of compliance buy outs are a sure thing. Then either edm holds on or pays to shift (but doesnt pay too much).
Right now he is unmoveable without paying a huge amount.
Riddler a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage