Quoting: MakingHistory
So are you with it or nope?
if i believe in Weber ,Petry and Juulsen for the next 3-5 years sure(which i happen to like)
but there is more upside in moving Petry but even with both Petry and Brook removed that just create's enough space for Fleury behind Juulsen and Weber .
Brook is Legit so if i could get a LD like Sanheim or Hayden Fleury then i probably dont bother as both those prospects could help us long enough to develop Mete , Romanov and Walford to play full time in years to come .
the issue is i'm not sure either team moves those players for Petry because of different organizational reasons as PHI a bottom feeder this year has no need in moving on Petry and i just dont see CAR who's trying to make room on D trading for Petry as i think thats the main reason a Hayden Fleury would be expendable .
VGK however is dead on their RD after Collin Miller and is exempt from next expansion draft with zero worry about protecting players allowing them to upgrade .
i think if you packaged Petry and a player like Hudon,Armia or Shaw who we wont protect in the expansion for Theodore and a conditional 3rd pick in 2019 that MTL would be better for it and VGK would to allowing VGK to gain pieces that allow them to make further moves in order to make their team better . i think Petry and Armia for Theodore and a 3rd is fair