Dont think the value is there for Chicago. But if I was the Habs I wouldn't give up anymore for him. Chicago and LA are both going to be interesting to watch with trade value, they have these older players locked up for years to go and I dont know how willing teams are going to take them on while giving up good young assets

Montreal says no, Keith would be a good addition but his NMC and the up coming expansion draft make him an awful long term investment. If he were to agree to be left exposed to the expansion draft, and it was cleared and approved by the league before the trade then sure, but if not Chicago would need to add some high value conditional picks and they wouldn't want to do that.

What I think a lot of people don’t realize is that Chicago wouldn’t move Keith, Kane or Toews unless it was a crazy over payment. Those three mean so much to their franchise and will have their numbers retired once they retire and maybe even have a statue outside of the United Center (at least Toews and Kane will)