SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

deadline deal and playoff lines if everyone is healthy

Créé par: sebski
Équipe: 2018-19 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 2 déc. 2018
Publié: 2 déc. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
assuming they have a fire sale at the deadline.
Transactions
TOR
  1. Martinez, Alec (1 000 000 $ retained)
LAK
  1. Bracco, Jeremy
  2. Marincin, Martin
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $73 786 111 $2 550 000 $5 400 000 $5 713 889 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 277 778 $10 277 778 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 déc. 2018 à 21 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,341
Mentions "j'aime": 2,389
Why did dermott get sent down? Wasn't he playing well
2 déc. 2018 à 21 h 52
#2
Leafs_Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 78
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Never trade your first round pick ever if you only have one. Solely for that, I wouldn't do that trade.
2 déc. 2018 à 21 h 53
#3
Démarrer sujet
sebski
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 72
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: arafay
Why did dermott get sent down? Wasn't he playing well


basically since they signed willy they had 1 too many contracts and need to waive someone or trade someone. since dermott can be sent down without the need to clear waivers it buys them time until their game on tuesday to make a trade or send down one of holl marincin or gauthier.
arafay a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2018 à 21 h 54
#4
Démarrer sujet
sebski
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 72
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: acalza
Never trade your first round pick ever if you only have one. Solely for that, I wouldn't do that trade.


since when?? pittsburg has had like 2 first rounders in the last 8 years and they seem to be doing farely decent. 1st rounders are not as valuable as a solid top 4 d man to the leafs.
2 déc. 2018 à 22 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,881
Mentions "j'aime": 2,372
Modifié 2 déc. 2018 à 22 h 17
A rental Dmen would be a better option, NYR - McQuaid?, Stl - Bouwmester?, Dall - Polak?, Det - Kronwall? Chi - Ruuta?
Ryminister_27 a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2018 à 22 h 4
#6
GT15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Dermott will be back up by Tuesday's game, they do have to make a roster move though. They have to make a trade or place someone on waivers.
2 déc. 2018 à 22 h 5
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,341
Mentions "j'aime": 2,389
Quoting: sebski
basically since they signed willy they had 1 too many contracts and need to waive someone or trade someone. since dermott can be sent down without the need to clear waivers it buys them time until their game on tuesday to make a trade or send down one of holl marincin or gauthier.


that's what I thought, thanks
2 déc. 2018 à 22 h 28
#8
Jangle29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 3,034
Mentions "j'aime": 832
Quoting: acalza
Never trade your first round pick ever if you only have one. Solely for that, I wouldn't do that trade.


Sooner or later you go for it so get ready to lose your mind when it happens. One of those years to go for it would classify as a year when you are hovering around 1st place overall
2 déc. 2018 à 22 h 29
#9
Jangle29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 3,034
Mentions "j'aime": 832
I prefer paying a bit more for Faulk 50% retained. Allows to keep him next season and even extend when Marleau is off the books
2 déc. 2018 à 22 h 32
#10
Démarrer sujet
sebski
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 72
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Jangle29
I prefer paying a bit more for Faulk 50% retained. Allows to keep him next season and even extend when Marleau is off the books


the problem with faulk is carolina would need either johnsson or kapanen in the deal as they arnt looking for picks and prospects they want young forwards who can play. I would be ok with doing kappy and like a second or third or johnsson and a first for faulk 50% retained but if the leafs were to go all in this year i would rather keep the forward group as is and use non roster assets to get the solid top 4 rhd to push them over the edge.
3 déc. 2018 à 2 h 13
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
A rental Dmen would be a better option, NYR - McQuaid?, Stl - Bouwmester?, Dall - Polak?, Det - Kronwall? Chi - Ruuta?


God please just don't bring Polak back tho. Leafs need d that can skate, he's well past that
3 déc. 2018 à 2 h 49
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 173
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
A rental Dmen would be a better option, NYR - McQuaid?, Stl - Bouwmester?, Dall - Polak?, Det - Kronwall? Chi - Ruuta?


I think if you had a chance to add a D-Man of Martinez's caliber for 2 more years at $3 mil a year you do it. That's cost effective in my opinion. Let Gardiner walk and have a top 6 next year of Reilly/Martinez/Dermott/Zaitsev/Ozhiganov/Liljigren. There has to be a way to make it work with the cap.
3 déc. 2018 à 5 h 33
#13
Jangle29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 3,034
Mentions "j'aime": 832
Quoting: sebski
the problem with faulk is carolina would need either johnsson or kapanen in the deal as they arnt looking for picks and prospects they want young forwards who can play. I would be ok with doing kappy and like a second or third or johnsson and a first for faulk 50% retained but if the leafs were to go all in this year i would rather keep the forward group as is and use non roster assets to get the solid top 4 rhd to push them over the edge.


I do Johnsson and a 1st anyway. Have to pay to get and sooner or later you go for it
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage