SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Opening Night

Créé par: Cs_7
Équipe: 2018-19 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 20 sept. 2018
Publié: 20 sept. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
56 500 000 $
Transactions
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $67 658 333 $2 550 000 $5 400 000 $11 841 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
650 000 $650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
650 000 $650 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 sept. 2018 à 14 h 27
#1
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,055
Mentions "j'aime": 3,757
Nylander is getting definatly less than 6.5 per
20 sept. 2018 à 14 h 27
#2
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,055
Mentions "j'aime": 3,757
Nylander is getting definatly less than 6.5 per
20 sept. 2018 à 14 h 37
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,746
Mentions "j'aime": 22,780
Five years is a term the Leafs don't want. It leads right into UFA. So more years, or a 1-4 bridge. I'm not a fan of Carrick, but the Leafs shouldn't be giving him away as he might be needed this year. Holl is more likely candidate 8th Dman as he would likely clearly waivers
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
20 sept. 2018 à 14 h 37
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: Trickster
Nylander is getting definatly less than 6.5 per


Definitely, because you have Dubas on speed dial? No, both sides want a long term deal so we are talking 7 or 8 years and that term will increase the cap hit. Which isn't at all a problem either, he'll more than earn whatever contract he gets.
20 sept. 2018 à 14 h 38
#5
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
I think this could work but we would have to see how gardiner handles the tougher assignments. This leaves less juggling to do when we need to rest hainsey. We could simply insert borgman or Rosen.
20 sept. 2018 à 14 h 45
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,746
Mentions "j'aime": 22,780
Quoting: Jamiepo
I think this could work but we would have to see how gardiner handles the tougher assignments. This leaves less juggling to do when we need to rest hainsey. We could simply insert borgman or Rosen.


I really think the pairing of Gardiner and Reilly is so unfounded. It's this illusion of creating of "a # 1pairing". The offence of Gardiner and Reilly needed to split up into two pairs. Gardiner is not trusted to be PK, I gotta think he needs an solid Dman beside on regular shifts....either Zaitsev or Ozzie.
Hainsey did very well with Reilly last year and since the Leafs seem to have to enough NHL good LHD, I imagine Hainsey has to play on the right side. Let's hope Babcock doesn't overwork him like last year's rented mule.
GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
20 sept. 2018 à 15 h 1
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: palhal
Five years is a term the Leafs don't want. It leads right into UFA. So more years, or a 1-4 bridge. I'm not a fan of Carrick, but the Leafs shouldn't be giving him away as he might be needed this year. Holl is more likely candidate 8th Dman as he would likely clearly waivers


If Carrick ever got to play regular minutes he'd do exactly what he did last night. He won't be the star of the game ever but he'll never be a problem. He has a very good stick and is a bull dog. I'd play him over Hainsey on the right side to be honest. Hainsey is good in front of the net and is a great PK guy but he's not the fastest anymore and he's on his weak side and that does make it hard for him to press the play up the right hand side of the ice. I think Hainsey would be far better on the 3rd pairing left side.

I was also impressed with Holl, he's another guy that is just solid. Won't blow you away with any part of his game but he's just smart all around (At least that's how he looked in the small sample size I've seen him in.)

Ozhiganov is also looking pretty good. I really don't think TO needs to make any moves on the back end, they need to just play better team defence.
Cs_7 a aimé ceci.
20 sept. 2018 à 15 h 17
#8
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: palhal
I really think the pairing of Gardiner and Reilly is so unfounded. It's this illusion of creating of "a # 1pairing". The offence of Gardiner and Reilly needed to split up into two pairs. Gardiner is not trusted to be PK, I gotta think he needs an solid Dman beside on regular shifts....either Zaitsev or Ozzie.
Hainsey did very well with Reilly last year and since the Leafs seem to have to enough NHL good LHD, I imagine Hainsey has to play on the right side. Let's hope Babcock doesn't overwork him like last year's rented mule.


It would be an experiment for sure, I’m not a hater of Gardiner and I think he was pretty good defensively last season. My issue is trying to get hainsey som rest this year and get Borgman into the lineup a bit. Now Injuries may play a part in doing that granted. If there were a way to get Hainsey back to the left side this would work out well for when he is rested. Yes Holl and carrick can both fill in on the right but I don’t see them as being part of the future. I think that Borgman or Rosen will be needed for the next few years till we se if sandin is ready.
Cs_7 a aimé ceci.
20 sept. 2018 à 15 h 23
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,746
Mentions "j'aime": 22,780
Quoting: Jamiepo
It would be an experiment for sure, I’m not a hater of Gardiner and I think he was pretty good defensively last season. My issue is trying to get hainsey som rest this year and get Borgman into the lineup a bit. Now Injuries may play a part in doing that granted. If there were a way to get Hainsey back to the left side this would work out well for when he is rested. Yes Holl and carrick can both fill in on the right but I don’t see them as being part of the future. I think that Borgman or Rosen will be needed for the next few years till we se if sandin is ready.


I was a fan of Borgman last year. If he deserves to be in top 6, maybe so switching to the right side by some one is necessary. You and me are kinda optimistic about the Leafs next year even wiihout Gardiner and Hainsey. Borgman, Rosen, Liljegren...maybe Sandin could be ready.
Cs_7 a aimé ceci.
20 sept. 2018 à 16 h 9
#10
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: palhal
I was a fan of Borgman last year. If he deserves to be in top 6, maybe so switching to the right side by some one is necessary. You and me are kinda optimistic about the Leafs next year even wiihout Gardiner and Hainsey. Borgman, Rosen, Liljegren...maybe Sandin could be ready.


I’m not opposed to dermott switching over either and pairing up with gardiner so long as he keeps progressing how he has. I didn’t get to watch the second game against Ottawa just the condensed version. Apparently Rosen did well too. Borgman in that first game was fantastic. I would rather see hainsey’s down time going to the left side so we can have that sorted out, I’m sure liljegren will get some starts on the right but I would really like to be patient with him and just make sure he is ready to go next year. Next season:

Reilly/Zaitsev
Dermott/liljegren
Borgman/Ozhiganov

I feel really good about this. We have been drafting well in the later parts of the 1st 2nd and even third rounds. If we can keep developing the future looks bright, even with our offence. As these kids move up we can keep the cupboards full of prospects and picks by moving out other players that aren’t part of our core. It’s beneficial to farm players rather than chase them in FA or trades.

I think with our offence generated by the blue line and some good team defence coming back from the forwards it makes for a very potent two way system.
palhal et Cs_7 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage