SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trade With CAR

Créé par: ForsbergForVezina
Équipe: 2018-19 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 15 août 2018
Publié: 15 août 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just for fun, but it's something I could see working out for both teams.

EDM: Edmonton gets a top-4 defenseman in Faulk, who can provide both solid offense and defense. They are in desperate need of a right-shot d-man and Faulk has been rumored to be on the block for a long time. Giving up Nuge would be tough, as he has been there for years, but if this team is to reach their full potential, changes have to be made.

CAR: Carolina is rather weak at the center position and moving out a guy like Faulk to bring in a potential top-line center in RNH would go a long way to help fix that. He is also on a multi-year deal and will provide roster security in a way that Jeff Skinner could not. Carolina could build around him for the future, as he is only 25 and playing with a veteran could help the development of young guys like Svechnikov and Necas.

Draft Picks: I was unsure of what to do with the picks, but my thought process was essentially that Carolina would get one, as they would have to retain salary for Edmonton, but also give up a draft pick, as they would be receiving a guy who would likely be their No. 1 Center. It was hard for me to gauge who would get the more valuable pick, so I just threw two up there idk.


Let me know what you think idk
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 000 000 $
Transactions
EDM
  1. Faulk, Justin (1 208 333 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2019 (BUF)
CAR
  1. Nugent-Hopkins, Ryan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (NYI)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de BUF
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2020
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2021
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2379 500 000 $71 826 998 $0 $2 800 000 $7 673 002 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 3
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 8
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
675 000 $675 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
650 000 $650 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 3
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
2 941 667 $2 941 667 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 3
720 000 $720 000 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
DD
UFA - 2
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 août 2018 à 21 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,264
Mentions "j'aime": 987
Durring the last month of the 2017-18 season RNH was able to make himself basically untouchable because he could make McDavid play at a higher level than before (few IF any other players can do that). If the Oilers are moving him to Carolina you better believe the return is something along the lines of Faulk & Necas.

IMO something along the lines of Faulk for Strome & 2019 2nd is much more realistic for both sides
palhal et ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
15 août 2018 à 21 h 39
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,710
Mentions "j'aime": 23,342
Faulk isn't that good. How many top 4 Dmen can a out of the playoff team have.
Max, with his post above might be right Faulk for Strome.
ForsbergForVezina et Max a aimé ceci.
15 août 2018 à 21 h 44
#3
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,685
Mentions "j'aime": 2,260
Quoting: palhal
Faulk isn't that good. How many top 4 Dmen can a out of the playoff team have.
Max, with his post above might be right Faulk for Strome.


I see what you mean, but disagree on Edmonton being a bottom-feeder. Their mentality now has to be to win and I think that two years of Faulk gets them closer to achieving that goal. As for Strome, that is probably better for Edmonton, I just don't know how much Edmonton wants for him. The Blackhawks, for example, were interested in Faulk, but the price was apparently Brandon Saad.
15 août 2018 à 21 h 46
#4
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,685
Mentions "j'aime": 2,260
Quoting: Max
Durring the last month of the 2017-18 season RNH was able to make himself basically untouchable because he could make McDavid play at a higher level than before (few IF any other players can do that). If the Oilers are moving him to Carolina you better believe the return is something along the lines of Faulk & Necas.

IMO something along the lines of Faulk for Strome & 2019 2nd is much more realistic for both sides


Alright, cool. My response to the other guy kinda details my thought process regarding Faulk, but I understand
15 août 2018 à 21 h 54
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,710
Mentions "j'aime": 23,342
[
regarding Faulk, but I understand/quote]

We all do it when analyze trades, thinking how that one addition will greatly help a team, not taking into consideration(at times) the "subtraction" that is required to obtain that player.
15 août 2018 à 22 h 9
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 3,264
Mentions "j'aime": 987
Quoting: palhal
[
regarding Faulk, but I understand/quote]

We all do it when analyze trades, thinking how that one addition will greatly help a team, not taking into consideration(at times) the "subtraction" that is required to obtain that player.


If you look at Carolinas depth chart, they currently have 3 Centres who are eity NHL ready or could be by seadon start. Staal, Rask & Necas. And on defence they have a plethora of decent NHL defenceman. Hamilton, Slavin, Pesce, Faulk, De Haan, TVR, Bean(?), etc. Adding another Centre is much more beneficial then hoarding defencemen
16 août 2018 à 11 h 28
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 514
Mentions "j'aime": 73
If this was mid season or last off season, Faulk for RNH would have been a no brainer. But now that RNH is on Mcdavids wing, he was on pace for 90+ points, will that happen, not likely, but its not out of the realm that he nets 70-80 points playing on McDavid's wing. So based on assumption, would you trade a 70 point winger making 6 mill who is 25 years old?
ForsbergForVezina et palhal a aimé ceci.
16 août 2018 à 12 h 26
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,710
Mentions "j'aime": 23,342
Quoting: Max
If you look at Carolinas depth chart, they currently have 3 Centres who are eity NHL ready or could be by seadon start. Staal, Rask & Necas. And on defence they have a plethora of decent NHL defenceman. Hamilton, Slavin, Pesce, Faulk, De Haan, TVR, Bean(?), etc. Adding another Centre is much more beneficial then hoarding defencemen


I was looking at more the the Oilers view, losing their top LWer.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage