SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cup Mode On

Créé par: csick
Équipe: 2018-19 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 15 août 2018
Publié: 15 août 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Stone, Mark
Détails additionnels:
Retain 3.35 mill
OTT
  1. Frolík, Michael
  2. Välimäki, Juuso
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de NYI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CAR
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2080 000 000 $73 490 043 $0 $1 032 500 $6 509 957 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 5
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 6
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 6
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 4
4 650 400 $4 650 400 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
3 857 143 $3 857 143 $
DD
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 août 2018 à 15 h 11
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,071
Mentions "j'aime": 1,592
nope, Flames want Stone, it will cost them Tkachuk
15 août 2018 à 15 h 20
#2
Log off the internet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 7,837
Mentions "j'aime": 3,867
Lol wtf
15 août 2018 à 15 h 25
#3
VeeMerk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 210
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: athrin
nope, Flames want Stone, it will cost them Tkachuk


WOAH relax there sir. I think it's safe to say that Stone will not resign in Ottawa next year. And where on earth do you think that Stone gets you Tkachuk? That's not saying Stone isn't a great player, cause he is... that just means that anybody would rather have Tkachuk over Stone. There's a pretty significant age difference, Tkchuck has better raw talent and the contract situation.

So in return you're getting a 1st, a solid former 1st round defender prospect and a cap dump that's UFA in 2 years. The 1st should be a 2019 but other than that, I can't see any teams beat that offer...
15 août 2018 à 15 h 47
#4
dirtysaucedonny
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 207
Mentions "j'aime": 41
Quoting: VeeMerk
WOAH relax there sir. I think it's safe to say that Stone will not resign in Ottawa next year. And where on earth do you think that Stone gets you Tkachuk? That's not saying Stone isn't a great player, cause he is... that just means that anybody would rather have Tkachuk over Stone. There's a pretty significant age difference, Tkchuck has better raw talent and the contract situation.

So in return you're getting a 1st, a solid former 1st round defender prospect and a cap dump that's UFA in 2 years. The 1st should be a 2019 but other than that, I can't see any teams beat that offer...


It's nto "safe to say" Stone won't be back in Ottawa. If that were the case, he would already be gone. Secondly, there's no way I would ever take Matt Tkachuk over Stone. I'd gladly pay Stone what he's worth and keep him over Tkachuk. Stone is easily a top 10 RW in the league, Tkachuk is not. I think if Stone was considered a rental, the price would be high. Any team wanting to make a playoff push would easily offer up a young prospect and a first round pick. You want me to take an overpaid Frolik and get Stone in return for a playoff run, yeah i want more than Valimaki and a 1st. I'd look elsewhere if this was the return. A team like VGK or NSH would gladly give up a first round pick and high-end prospect for Stone, with probably a few other low end pieces. I could name 10 teams who would happily beat that offer for a year of Mark Stone.
15 août 2018 à 16 h 23
#5
VeeMerk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 210
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: dirtysaucedonny
It's nto "safe to say" Stone won't be back in Ottawa. If that were the case, he would already be gone. Secondly, there's no way I would ever take Matt Tkachuk over Stone. I'd gladly pay Stone what he's worth and keep him over Tkachuk. Stone is easily a top 10 RW in the league, Tkachuk is not. I think if Stone was considered a rental, the price would be high. Any team wanting to make a playoff push would easily offer up a young prospect and a first round pick. You want me to take an overpaid Frolik and get Stone in return for a playoff run, yeah i want more than Valimaki and a 1st. I'd look elsewhere if this was the return. A team like VGK or NSH would gladly give up a first round pick and high-end prospect for Stone, with probably a few other low end pieces. I could name 10 teams who would happily beat that offer for a year of Mark Stone.


If I can't say Stone won't resign in Ottawa then you can't say 10 teams would be willing to trade a high end prospect, a 1st and other pieces.. I'm not trying to say Stone isn't a top 10 RW in the league, he's been amazing the last 3 years.. Maybe I was devaluation Stone by agreeing with that trade, that's my mistake but I would still take Matt Tkachuck over Stone for a one-on-one
15 août 2018 à 16 h 51
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 606
Mentions "j'aime": 119
Quoting: dirtysaucedonny
It's nto "safe to say" Stone won't be back in Ottawa. If that were the case, he would already be gone. Secondly, there's no way I would ever take Matt Tkachuk over Stone. I'd gladly pay Stone what he's worth and keep him over Tkachuk. Stone is easily a top 10 RW in the league, Tkachuk is not. I think if Stone was considered a rental, the price would be high. Any team wanting to make a playoff push would easily offer up a young prospect and a first round pick. You want me to take an overpaid Frolik and get Stone in return for a playoff run, yeah i want more than Valimaki and a 1st. I'd look elsewhere if this was the return. A team like VGK or NSH would gladly give up a first round pick and high-end prospect for Stone, with probably a few other low end pieces. I could name 10 teams who would happily beat that offer for a year of Mark Stone.


Tkachuk is not on the table for a trade. he is one of calgarys untouchables unless there is a massive overpay. and from the above comment Valimaki is a high end prospect. Valimaki and a first is a pretty solid offer for a rental. maybe we throw in Kilmchuk or Kylington but I don't see many more teams offering more than that. Frolik is also in there because Calgary would need to clear cap to take on Stones contract
15 août 2018 à 16 h 52
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 606
Mentions "j'aime": 119
Ottawa is a dumpster fire that is only intensifying it makes sense for them to be selling off their UFA's unless there is absolute certainty they are going to sign there
15 août 2018 à 17 h 19
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 348
Mentions "j'aime": 73
More than fair
15 août 2018 à 17 h 44
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 49
Mentions "j'aime": 10
I would not by any stretch say that Tkachuk is better than Stone (coming from a flames fan).

If this were a deadline deal and Calgary had contract in place to resign Stone, then I think it's a fair deal. Valimaki is a high-end D prospect. If Stone wanted to stay in Ottawa he would have signed more than a 1 year deal as he had the leverage in his contract negotiations, even if Melnyk was cheaping out on AAV for a longer term deal. Seems like a low value to get for Stone but it's a better deal than having Stone leave for nothing, in free agency. Stone is a very very good RW.
15 août 2018 à 22 h 53
#10
WorthyIdiot
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 84
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: athrin
nope, Flames want Stone, it will cost them Tkachuk

There is no way in hell Mark Stone is worth Matthew Tkachuk. It’s surprisig how one of the best D prospects in the game doesn’t interest you though. This trade needs more, but Tkachuk for Stone 1 for 1, the flames would be fleeced.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage