SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Taking a stab at a Karlsson trade

Créé par: SankFeravalli
Équipe: 2018-19 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 7 juill. 2018
Publié: 7 juill. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Let’s be honest - no one is really sure what this deal will look like. There are a lot of moving parts, especially regarding all the salary being moved from both Ottawa and Tampa. Here’s my thought process for the two trades.

Tampa-Ottawa
The Senators get back Sergachev, Foote, Gourde, and a 1st round pick for Karlsson. They swap Barre-Broulet for Chlapik in exchange for taking on Ryan’s contract. Drake Batherson and Alex Barre-Broulet played together in junior, and Chlapik will the piece Tampa uses to flip Ryan.

Tampa-Montreal
The Habs take on a lot of salary, but they’re rewarded with Chlapik and Raddysh. Chlapik - a coveted center - can play right away, and Raddysh is pretty close. Tampa gets back a cheap but effective forward on an expiring contract.

What are your thoughts?
Transactions
1.
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
2021
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2279 500 000 $76 742 114 $142 947 $365 000 $2 757 886 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 5
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
4 766 667 $4 766 667 $
AD
UFA - 1
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
686 667 $686 667 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
728 333 $728 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
1 166 667 $1 166 667 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
677 500 $677 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
4 700 000 $4 700 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
G
UFA - 2
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
865 000 $865 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 juill. 2018 à 10 h 9
#1
BigBeardBurns
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 3,350
Mentions "j'aime": 535
If Montreal’s taking on cap idk if they want to give Byron up. If anything, they’d want a little more considering they r taking Ryan and Callahan. At 1st glance I thought Tampa would have no interest in trading both Sergachev and Foote, but I guess if they get EK...
As much as Tampa needs a 1 RHD, I realized they also lack depth up front, so we’ll see what happens. I like ur idea tho.
7 juill. 2018 à 10 h 14
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 1,086
Mentions "j'aime": 324
Quoting: BigBeardBurns
If Montreal’s taking on cap idk if they want to give Byron up. If anything, they’d want a little more considering they r taking Ryan and Callahan. At 1st glance I thought Tampa would have no interest in trading both Sergachev and Foote, but I guess if they get EK...
As much as Tampa needs a 1 RHD, I realized they also lack depth up front, so we’ll see what happens. I like ur idea tho.


I definitely see your points. It’s so tough to figure this one out. Ottawa wants to move money, Tampa has to move money. The bold have a ton of prospects to give but do they want to clean out the cupboards entirely? They can keep paying in prospects and picks to get rid of salary and add players on decent contracts. I guess that’s why they’re the pros and we’re the arm-chair GMs lol. One thing I tried at first was having Gallagher come back to Tampa. He’s on a nice contract at 3.25x3yrs, and would give them some depth up front. But they would have to move Johnson, Miller, Palat, or Killorn to fit him in. That might not be a bad option though to save a little money for a comparable player.
BigBeardBurns a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2018 à 10 h 41
#3
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,080
Mentions "j'aime": 3,775
I think point has to go to Ottawa instead of course.
7 juill. 2018 à 10 h 47
#4
Subbanator
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 7,582
Mentions "j'aime": 3,479
Can’t see Montreal helping out two division rivals like that unless they really make it worth it, which they don’t. The two prospects are nice but that’s a lot of salary for a long time and a team rebuilding can’t afford to take that on. Especially with Carey and Webers contracts already being substantial.
7 juill. 2018 à 10 h 59
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 1,086
Mentions "j'aime": 324
Quoting: Trickster
I think point has to go to Ottawa instead of course.


If I’m Ottawa, I’m asking for Sergachev, Point, and a 1st round pick. It seems simple enough, but the issue with including Point is that he’s on his ELC, and provides Tampa with cheap offense that allows them to add Karlsson and keep most of their team together for one more season. There’s also the potential that he signs a Kucherov-like bridge to give the bolts 2 or 3 more really good runs. HOWEVER (we can argue back and forth for eternity) the counter argument is that by trading Point, you maintain your prospect pipeline, and the opportunity for several young players to step in and provide that same impact on their ELCs.
7 juill. 2018 à 11 h 1
#6
Go Bolts!!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 426
Mentions "j'aime": 153
Quoting: rtapp326
If I’m Ottawa, I’m asking for Sergachev, Point, and a 1st round pick. It seems simple enough, but the issue with including Point is that he’s on his ELC, and provides Tampa with cheap offense that allows them to add Karlsson and keep most of their team together for one more season. There’s also the potential that he signs a Kucherov-like bridge to give the bolts 2 or 3 more really good runs. HOWEVER (we can argue back and forth for eternity) the counter argument is that by trading Point, you maintain your prospect pipeline, and the opportunity for several young players to step in and provide that same impact on their ELCs.


Any deal for Karlsson ends with Brayden Point, all other prospects are on the table though. Subtracting point from the 2C really hinders the Bolts, he was the best forward for the Lightning in the playoffs outside game 1 against Boston and he is still on his ELC this year so they can ice the best possible team for a cup run if they got Karlsson. If they want Point then the Lightning are better off staying pat and trying to get Karlsson next year as a UFA if he doesn't re-sign anywhere.
7 juill. 2018 à 11 h 20
#7
hey look a squirrel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 6,080
Mentions "j'aime": 3,775
I'm sure someone else trade for Karlsson and resign him no problem.

Nothing says he only has to go Tampa only.
8 juill. 2018 à 7 h 17
#8
BigBeardBurns
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 3,350
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: Trickster
I'm sure someone else trade for Karlsson and resign him no problem.

Nothing says he only has to go Tampa only.


Yeah with all the stuff holding this trade back and with the complexness of it, they may be able to pull it through, but at this point I doubt he goes to Tampa. Ottawa needs to go to someone that at least has the money for next year.
Trickster a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage