Quoting: A_K
I agree about Jake, I don't want him to be the starter, but Army has to manage assets. If no one wanted Allen for a fair price, it means we have to keep him, and that means that Hutton had to move on. It would've been a mistake to offload him somewhere for pennies when he could end up putting up a good year and bring his trade value back up. I'm sure the Blues would've loved to keep Hutts but it's not like he's a proven starter that we should be happy to give the reigns over to - he's a career backup. The option Army went with gives Husso the best chance at success, and I like that.
I also think re-signing Brodziak would have been a great bottom six C option, but he chose to go closer to home with Edmonton, nothing Army can really do there. He definitely got panicky and threw money at Bozak, but IMO he totally redeemed himself by getting out from under the contracts of Sobotka and Berglund in that BUF trade. Although just like with Lehtera, he doesn't deserve to be called an angel for it, they were his signings in the first place. I don't love everything Army does, but he at least deserves a bit of credit as a pragmatist. He made the team a lot better without giving up on the future. We lost a pick in the late teens or 20s (11th as the worst case) and our 4th best forward prospect and we got a top 30 center in the league.
Sorry if it came off as condescending - I just got a little upset thinking about how you couldn't be satisfied by this offseason. Think if Army went status quo; no trades, no signings... that's what I try to compare his moves to, instead of some crazy expecation that we're going to become an amazing team overnight.
I appreciate your points, but I really think the Blues are a few years away from being competitive. Going into yesterday, you only had 3 forwards that were legit top-6. Now you have ROR and DP. I dearly hope that Fabbri can stay healthy and round out your top-6. Signing Maroon gives you a safe alternative that can play LW on any line and the Blues could use some toughness (Thornburn seems to be a great guy, just not fast enough to play against a lot of teams).
In a perfect world, R. Thomas becomes the high-end 1st line center that the Blues have lacked for years (since P. Turgeon?) in a couple of years and Foley and Bokk, Kostin, Kyrou follow suit. This is going to take time, but your young core - Parayko, Tarasenko, Edmundson, Dunn - aren't going anywhere and hopefully, Schenn and Schwartz (both 26) can be retained until some of these youngsters develop. Pietrangelo is 28 and will probably be playing great hockey for several years, but his next contract will probably be $9-10MM/yr. Do they keep him or trade him to a contender for a ransom (he has a NTC, but he might accept a trade to a contender, especially if it's his hometown, TOR). The Blues are desperate for a legit goalie, and next year's UFA class has a bunch of them. Not sure that we'll be able to participate. Defense will need attention also.
Confession - I'm not an Army fan. I know, shocker. I'm still disappointed that we traded Polak for Gunnarsson, we kept Allen instead of Ben Bishop, we signed P. Stastny to tall dollars and Hitchcock buried him on the 3rd line, and I'm pissed that we got nothing for Oshie, one of my favorite players (glad he won the Cup). Couple that with a couple of generations of being a Blues fan and, yeah, I might be a little jaded. Hitchcock's system was boring and frustrating to watch as skilled players struggled to follow all the rules. We finally had the #1 overall pick and we selected E. Johnson and left Staal, Toews, and Backstrom on the table (nobody's fault, Johnson was the consensus #1, or so we were told). A 3rd line hack from TOR named Kypreos runs Fuhr and ends our best shot at the Cup (Gretzky said that it was the best team he ever played on), and then there were those delightful Mike Keenan years. I could go on . . .
So, forgive my ranting. I should probably seek therapy! Thanks!