SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

One better Draft pick could have changed the outlook

Créé par: Rodzikhockey93
Équipe: 2018-19 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 4 juin 2018
Publié: 4 juin 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 500 000 $
66 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
65 750 000 $
11 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
    Korshov
    2.
    VAN
    1. Brown, Connor
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (TOR)
    Détails additionnels:
    Grundstrom
    3.
    4.
    TOR
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2019 (FLA)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2018
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de ANA
    2019
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de STL
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2020
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2280 000 000 $65 199 166 $2 550 000 $5 532 500 $14 800 834 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 5
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
    C
    UFA - 1
    778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 6
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    850 000 $850 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    863 333 $863 333 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    4 juin 2018 à 20 h 16
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2017
    Messages: 1,930
    Mentions "j'aime": 418
    Is Tanev made of gold....? Or glass?
    4 juin 2018 à 20 h 20
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 7,751
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,960
    Still have a weak defense. Gonna be another first round exit.
    4 juin 2018 à 20 h 21
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 2,933
    Mentions "j'aime": 362
    Be interesting. how Hunter's legacy is shaped when the Leafs picks are analyzed in ten years. Right now, average at best.
    Would have been nice to have Debrincat obviously but sure am glad that Tanev isn't a Leaf.
    4 juin 2018 à 20 h 22
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2018
    Messages: 912
    Mentions "j'aime": 118
    Anybody could have drafted better, like every team past on Kucherov like 5 times, and now they all regret it...
    4 juin 2018 à 20 h 34
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 7,751
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,960
    Quoting: OIlers4Life
    Anybody could have drafted better, like every team past on Kucherov like 5 times, and now they all regret it...


    He was a second round pick...
    4 juin 2018 à 21 h 13
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 132
    Mentions "j'aime": 11
    Quoting: wojme
    He was a second round pick...


    How bout ondrej palat
    .. the point he was making is that every team who picked someone not in the nhl when debrincat was avalible could say this.. the world doesnt revolve around toronto
    wojme a aimé ceci.
    4 juin 2018 à 21 h 13
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 132
    Mentions "j'aime": 11
    Quoting: clark
    Be interesting. how Hunter's legacy is shaped when the Leafs picks are analyzed in ten years. Right now, average at best.
    Would have been nice to have Debrincat obviously but sure am glad that Tanev isn't a Leaf.


    Why dont you like tanev
    4 juin 2018 à 21 h 57
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 3,301
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,512
    Quoting: Hackadart16
    Why dont you like tanev


    Neither traditional nor advanced stats suggest he is a quality defenceman. I don't get the attraction to him but am happy to hear the arguments for.
    4 juin 2018 à 23 h 6
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 132
    Mentions "j'aime": 11
    Quoting: Juice
    Neither traditional nor advanced stats suggest he is a quality defenceman. I don't get the attraction to him but am happy to hear the arguments for.


    I cheer for vancouver in the west and toronto in the east so i have watched him play a decent amount, he reminds me of exactly what babcock wishes hainsey is but better, he is very good transitionally, a good passer and closes the gap well in the defensive zone, i think he would be a great partner for rielly because he can play defence while rielly lights it up offensively, this was hainseys role this year but like i said i think tanev would be 100x as good for this job plus he can contribute offensivley a little
    5 juin 2018 à 6 h 3
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 2,933
    Mentions "j'aime": 362
    Quoting: Hackadart16
    Why dont you like tanev


    it's more the crazy demands by mostly Vancouver fans. leafs aren't giving up top futures for tanev. of course no other team is trading so much just to acquire tanev either.
    5 juin 2018 à 11 h 13
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 132
    Mentions "j'aime": 11
    Quoting: clark
    it's more the crazy demands by mostly Vancouver fans. leafs aren't giving up top futures for tanev. of course no other team is trading so much just to acquire tanev either.


    A late first, third line winger and b level prospect is not a crazy ask for a guy who will no doubt play on our top pair and improve our defence a ton
    5 juin 2018 à 14 h 58
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 2,933
    Mentions "j'aime": 362
    Quoting: Hackadart16
    A late first, third line winger and b level prospect is not a crazy ask for a guy who will no doubt play on our top pair and improve our defence a ton


    this crazy talk about a top pair again. top pair, bottom pair they all play. zaitsev and hainsey are playing right side next year....,they are doesn't matter what ranking you want to give them. so tanev plays the rhd spot replacing polak and carrick combo from last year, and the wild card of ozhikov, yep, tanev when he plays is a improvement of polak and carrick, the issue is the price to be pay
    to call grundstrom a b level prospect, sorry you don't the leafs. he's a starter next year on the leafs especially with jvr and komarov gone plus you want brown and 1st rounder to be added for a two year rental, when he's healthy. i know it's all subjective what tanev is worth but almost all trades of rhd especially to the leafs are seriously to high,
    5 juin 2018 à 15 h 23
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 132
    Mentions "j'aime": 11
    Quoting: clark
    this crazy
    Quoting: clark
    this crazy talk about a top pair again. top pair, bottom pair they all play. zaitsev and hainsey are playing right side next year....,they are doesn't matter what ranking you want to give them. so tanev plays the rhd spot replacing polak and carrick combo from last year, and the wild card of ozhikov, yep, tanev when he plays is a improvement of polak and carrick, the issue is the price to be pay
    to call grundstrom a b level prospect, sorry you don't the leafs. he's a starter next year on the leafs especially with jvr and komarov gone plus you want brown and 1st rounder to be added for a two year rental, when he's healthy. i know it's all subjective what tanev is worth but almost all trades of rhd especially to the leafs are seriously to high,


    Fine dont call him top pair but regardless he would be best d on our right side and play next to our best left d (rielly) (normally people call that a top pair) , and grundstrom is definetly a B level prospect at best... Marner and Nylander two years ago were A level, matthews A+, so unless u are blind enough to think he is on that level he is B, also How can grundstrom start.. you have hyman, marleau, johnsson, martin, and maybe lindholm or aaltonen if they play wing (one of them will) All above him on the depth charts. None of this is to say grundstrom isnt good but worth too much to trade, nah
    6 juin 2018 à 18 h 33
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2016
    Messages: 2,933
    Mentions "j'aime": 362
    Quoting: Hackadart16


    sorry if you don't follow the leafs. since Babcock likes balanced lines, there room for grundstrom and to get good minutes. Hyman came in as rookie and got good minutes with Matthews, there isn't any reason a two year veteran of the SHL and AHL doesn't warrant quality minutes . don't know why you think aaltonen and lindholm play wing they are centres and as you suggest the leafs have lots of wingers. sure wish the supporters of tanev could trade him to any other team but the leafs, but the reason is clear, there is any other team that really wants him? No since canucks fans think he is a # 1.
    10 juin 2018 à 20 h 17
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 132
    Mentions "j'aime": 11
    Quoting: clark
    sorry if you don't follow the leafs. since Babcock likes balanced lines, there room for grundstrom and to get good minutes. Hyman came in as rookie and got good minutes with Matthews, there isn't any reason a two year veteran of the SHL and AHL doesn't warrant quality minutes . don't know why you think aaltonen and lindholm play wing they are centres and as you suggest the leafs have lots of wingers. sure wish the supporters of tanev could trade him to any other team but the leafs, but the reason is clear, there is any other team that really wants him? No since canucks fans think he is a # 1.


    Actually since i do follow the leafs i know that babcock likes having two guys with center experience on every line, hence lindholm playing center with aaltonen as his wing each take draws on their strong side. And as for tanev im sorry if you dont understand what defence is
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage