SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Teach me how to Dougie OTT-CAL

Créé par: TkachukNorris79
Équipe: 2017-18 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 6 mai 2018
Publié: 6 mai 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Apparently he's available. And Bennett. Bennett's value is pretty tough to gauge. I'd say him and Ceci are probably a wash. Ceci probably holds a bit more value at this point as he's realistically at worst a #4D, and Bennett hasn't really shown anything to say he's a top 6. But he's still a recent 4OA so it's kind of a wash.

Stone and Smith are washes as well. We take on Stone as we don't resign Wideman, and you get Smith as a 4th line and get rid of Stone to let Andersson play.

That leaves Hamilton for Hoffman, 1st and a 3rd. I really like Dougie, and I think this is good value for him but I don't know if CAL bites.

Anyways, yeah I was bored.
Transactions
CGY
  1. Ceci, Cody
  2. Hoffman, Mike
  3. Smith, Zack
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2018 (PIT)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2018
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
2019
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
2020
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2675 000 000 $63 631 664 $0 $1 645 000 $11 368 336 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AD
UFA - 2
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C
UFA - 3
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
C
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
670 000 $670 000 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
728 333 $728 333 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
C
UFA - 3
650 000 $650 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
894 166 $894 166 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C
UFA - 2
784 166 $784 166 $
AG
RFA - 5
763 333 $763 333 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 200 000 $4 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance360 000 $$360K)
DG
UFA - 3
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
653 333 $653 333 $ (Bonis de performance70 000 $$70K)
DG
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
650 000 $650 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
4 650 000 $4 650 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mai 2018 à 5 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 306
Mentions "j'aime": 65
I think the value is good. I just can't see the Flames taking on 2 more LW's when they have Johnny Hockey and Tkachuk. Fun to think about though.
6 mai 2018 à 7 h 46
#2
BigBeardBurns
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 3,350
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: SirCharles
I think the value is good. I just can't see the Flames taking on 2 more LW's when they have Johnny Hockey and Tkachuk. Fun to think about though.


Maybe replace Hoffman with 1/2 retained BR and a 2nd?
6 mai 2018 à 10 h 2
#3
Lavsim
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 661
Mentions "j'aime": 152
Get a beat that's super bumping then put your arms out front, lean side to siderock on

As for the post, idk why there are always these Hamilton rumors considering he's inked to a long term deal and still young but i'd say the value is there but idk how much they would want to replace him by Ceci.
If the Sens do keep Karlsson, idk if this makes much sens either. I'd rather target a partner for Karlsson then get a guy to play behind him.

For the roster, i'll say that Formenton should really get a chance at a top-9 spot and Brown too.
6 mai 2018 à 12 h 48
#4
Yeah Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 1,370
Mentions "j'aime": 322
I wouldn't trade Hamilton alone for that package yet you think the Flames will just toss in Bennett and Stone too?

Now, Bennett and Stone aren't great assets at this point, but Hamilton certainly is.

Let me give you an idea of what Calgary needs in return for Hamilton: Dougie Hamilton for Mark Stone straight up. Elite Dman for an elite forward in the same age age group. Pure hockey trade.
6 mai 2018 à 20 h 11
#5
Beanmachine
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,485
Mentions "j'aime": 498
I agree Stone for Hamilton is the only way Ottawa gets DH
6 mai 2018 à 21 h 0
#6
=O=
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 30
Mentions "j'aime": 0
Stone is better than Hamilton so stop trying to get him or add to Hamilton.
7 mai 2018 à 4 h 23
#7
Démarrer sujet
TkachukNorris79
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 1,256
Mentions "j'aime": 377
Quoting: BurnEmUp
I wouldn't trade Hamilton alone for that package yet you think the Flames will just toss in Bennett and Stone too?

Now, Bennett and Stone aren't great assets at this point, but Hamilton certainly is.

Let me give you an idea of what Calgary needs in return for Hamilton: Dougie Hamilton for Mark Stone straight up. Elite Dman for an elite forward in the same age age group. Pure hockey trade.


I've watched a lot of flames and a lot of sens. Dougie Hamilton is not elite, and neither is Mark Stone. That word gets used way too often. But Stone is closer to it than Hamilton. You could use the "defence are more valuable than wingers" argument but Stone is one of the few wingers who is tremendous both offensively and defensively. Over a PPG this year too on a really bad team.

I get that you wouldn't want to trade Hamilton without getting someone like Stone back, I wouldn't want to either. But there are some rumors he's being shopped, and a package like this helps you now as well as gives you a 1st this year.
7 mai 2018 à 14 h 57
#8
Yeah Baby
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 1,370
Mentions "j'aime": 322
Quoting: MelnykOut
I've watched a lot of flames and a lot of sens. Dougie Hamilton is not elite, and neither is Mark Stone. That word gets used way too often. But Stone is closer to it than Hamilton. You could use the "defence are more valuable than wingers" argument but Stone is one of the few wingers who is tremendous both offensively and defensively. Over a PPG this year too on a really bad team.

I get that you wouldn't want to trade Hamilton without getting someone like Stone back, I wouldn't want to either. But there are some rumors he's being shopped, and a package like this helps you now as well as gives you a 1st this year.


No, we don't want that crappy package for an ELITE defenseman. That package makes our team worse when you factor in that Hamilton would be gone.

Quote:
There are 77 NHL defensemen that played more than 1250 minutes last year.

In that group of 77 Hamilton is ....

2nd in CF%
2nd in Shot differential
34th in goal differential
3rd in scoring chance differential
2nd in high danger chance differential

Someone above mentioned he gives up too many scoring chances.

he gave up the 12th least of the 77 in scoring chances against
he gave up the 10th least of the 77 in high danger chances against

he was ranked 56th in on ice shooting percentage and
62nd in on ice save percentage suggesting he was somewhat unlucky last season to be honest.


That is pretty ELITE.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage