SalarySwishSalarySwish

Would moving Mathews work? Knights reunion.

Créé par: Davisoc
Équipe: 2018-19 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 31 juill. 2018
Publié: 31 juill. 2018
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
So, I am not saying moving Mathews it smart, or even the right move. My idea behind it is simple, why cap crunch so hard on this core, when we could make it work for us.

If the value isn't right, please give me a counter proposal, reading "no" or so and so hangs up, is annoying. Just give me your honest opinion and what you think is fair. I want a conversation.

My goal is to have the OHL Knights first line reunion back when Marner was there.

Bridge deal for Nylander to buy the leafs time to get Marleau off the books before his big pay raise.

Give bridge deals to Dvorak (2/3 @ 2-3mill), bridge for Tkachuk (3-4 @ 3-4mill).
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
24 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CGY
  1. Keller, Clayton
  2. Leivo, Josh
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2019 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2019
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2179 500 000 $66 347 500 $2 550 000 $3 612 500 $13 152 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 7
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
839 167 $839 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
C
UFA - 1
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

31 juill. 2018 à 9 h 3
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,111
Mentions "j'aime": 771
Ekman-Larsson is a LD but I’m not sure if he’d be able to play on his off side. Don’t think the value is terrible on the ARI trade leafs might have to add a pick or another prospect to seal the deal. Honestly if the leafs are able to acquire Keller I’d keep him. Kid looks like he’ll be a 80+ point player especially playing with Tavares. But if you want Tkachuk I think Keller for Tkachuk 1for1 could work.
31 juill. 2018 à 9 h 9
#2
Wannabe Leafs GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,013
Mentions "j'aime": 307
Quoting: Mike7856
Ekman-Larsson is a LD but I’m not sure if he’d be able to play on his off side. Don’t think the value is terrible on the ARI trade leafs might have to add a pick or another prospect to seal the deal. Honestly if the leafs are able to acquire Keller I’d keep him. Kid looks like he’ll be a 80+ point player especially playing with Tavares. But if you want Tkachuk I think Keller for Tkachuk 1for1 could work.


I know that isn't EOL normal side, I was just putting him there for now. As for Keller I was thinking the same thing I just didn't know if people shared my enthusiasm for Keller. The big reason for Tkachuk is to add back some of the grit we lost from losing Leo and Matt, but also reuniting that line that was silly in the O. As for the slight over pay, its because the Flames arent shopping him, so I thought we would have to give up more to wrestle him away.
Mike7856 a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2018 à 9 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
The Matthews line was the best in the league last year based on goal differential per 60. Why destroy that just to unite a line that worked against 17-year-olds?
31 juill. 2018 à 9 h 49
#4
Wannabe Leafs GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,013
Mentions "j'aime": 307
Quoting: CD282
The Matthews line was the best in the league last year based on goal differential per 60. Why destroy that just to unite a line that worked against 17-year-olds?


The point was more so to save on cap, get a legit stud defender and bring in a line with massive potential. Again, it was just for a fun what if scenario.

To quote my description, "So, I am not saying moving Mathews it smart, or even the right move. My idea behind it is simple, why cap crunch so hard on this core, when we could make it work for us."
31 juill. 2018 à 10 h 2
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,790
Mentions "j'aime": 22,820
Why do you think Matthews is cap crunch and then waste 8.5m on OEL?
CD282 a aimé ceci.
Voir tout