SalarySwishSalarySwish

Necas

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 21 mai 2024
Publié: 21 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 750 000 $
21 200 000 $
21 200 000 $
21 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
25 000 000 $
Transactions
CHI
  1. Necas, Martin [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
I would do 20 this year, but then Carolina would receive the worst 2nd the hawks have next year.
CAR
  1. Kaiser, Wyatt
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Equal to two first round picks and the Canes get a young D to help transition away form some UFA’s.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $73 090 833 $0 $6 390 000 $14 609 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance900 000 $$900K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AD
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

21 mai à 15 h 1
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,871
Mentions "j'aime": 5,220
A package of futures won't interest Carolina, though the value here isn't bad. They'll want to supplement the current core. If Chicago had that, they wouldn't be as bad as they were this year
Garak a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 15 h 16
#2
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 10,165
Mentions "j'aime": 6,320
Quoting: Caniac2000
A package of futures won't interest Carolina, though the value here isn't bad. They'll want to supplement the current core. If Chicago had that, they wouldn't be as bad as they were this year


While I typically don’t like putting the onus on the receiving teams in these types of deals… the can could use the capital to do exactly what you are saying. At the very least if this was the best pure value deal the canes received in exchange for Necas I would hope they strongly consider it.
tugspiedman et Garak a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 15 h 18
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,871
Mentions "j'aime": 5,220
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
While I typically don’t like putting the onus on the receiving teams in these types of deals… the can could use the capital to do exactly what you are saying. At the very least if this was the best pure value deal the canes received in exchange for Necas I would hope they strongly consider it.


The best value they'll get for Necas is using him to get something bigger. Something like (and I'm not suggesting this, but more an idea) Necas and a 1st for Eichel. Something like that, not that exactly.
Garak a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 15 h 21
#4
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 10,165
Mentions "j'aime": 6,320
Quoting: Caniac2000
The best value they'll get for Necas is using him to get something bigger. Something like (and I'm not suggesting this, but more an idea) Necas and a 1st for Eichel. Something like that, not that exactly.


I agree that a hypothetical like that is ideal for the canes, but I am more so suggesting that if the offer presented in the post is the best they get around draft time, they should consider it.
Garak a aimé ceci.
21 mai à 15 h 23
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 20,871
Mentions "j'aime": 5,220
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
I agree that a hypothetical like that is ideal for the canes, but I am more so suggesting that if the offer presented in the post is the best they get around draft time, they should consider it.


Maybe if the 1st was this year, but a day two pick isn't a matter urgent enough to make that decision by the draft with SO much work needing to be done with the pending free agents, Nikishin, the draft itself, figuring out if they're going to extend the draft by another 6 hours by themselves again like they did in 2020... a lot to think about.
Garak a aimé ceci.
Voir tout