SalarySwishSalarySwish

RFA shopping

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2024-25 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 13 mai 2024
Publié: 13 mai 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Testing testing… is this thing on?

Not a realistic projection. But tell me your honest opinion of these two acquisitions (not the trades, but the players)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
84 500 000 $
84 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
28 000 000 $
25 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Lundell, Anton [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Middle 6 player for a long time, allows Nazar to develop in Rockford.
FLA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TBL)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $73 540 833 $0 $5 490 000 $9 959 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

13 mai à 21 h 29
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,348
Mentions "j'aime": 744
I like both players but I think Lundell fits a little better. I dont know that his acquisition would push Nazar down to rockford necessarily but the profile fits what the front office likes. I like Durzi a lot personally but I'd ideally get a more responsible and bigger RHD with the intention of pairing him with KK for the next few seasons if youre going to spend assets on getting that player.
Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
13 mai à 21 h 31
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,873
Mentions "j'aime": 12,441
Like Lundell's game. Still has upside I think. Not sure he's ever going to provide enough offense to be an effective 2C, which is the only reason Hawks should acquire him. Hawks have Green, Ludwinski, Thompson and Misiak already as 3C prospects.

Durzi seems like a better version of Mitchell to me. Good offensive D man who struggles defensively and doesn't have the size the Hawks are looking for. Can't see him being a target.
Kyle_Davidson a aimé ceci.
13 mai à 21 h 44
#3
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 10,166
Mentions "j'aime": 6,320
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Like Lundell's game. Still has upside I think. Not sure he's ever going to provide enough offense to be an effective 2C, which is the only reason Hawks should acquire him. Hawks have Green, Ludwinski, Thompson and Misiak already as 3C prospects.

Durzi seems like a better version of Mitchell to me. Good offensive D man who struggles defensively and doesn't have the size the Hawks are looking for. Can't see him being a target.


Lundell can be a stopgap 2C while the other prospects develop. When we are competing, I think he is an Elite 3C who can jump up to 2C in case of injury.

Durzi is interesting to me, IMO hawks need more offense from the blue line… but I understand the concerns.
13 mai à 21 h 51
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,873
Mentions "j'aime": 12,441
Quoting: Kyle_Davidson
Lundell can be a stopgap 2C while the other prospects develop. When we are competing, I think he is an Elite 3C who can jump up to 2C in case of injury.

Durzi is interesting to me, IMO hawks need more offense from the blue line… but I understand the concerns.


I know you said disregard the trades. But with what Lundell likely costs to acquire, seems like poor asset management for a future 3C. He's gotta be your 2C for what he's going to cost.

Korchinski, Rinzell, DelMastro can all provide offense. And Jones is likely around for at least 4 more years too.
13 mai à 22 h 6
#5
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 10,166
Mentions "j'aime": 6,320
Quoting: Hawksguy81
I know you said disregard the trades. But with what Lundell likely costs to acquire, seems like poor asset management for a future 3C. He's gotta be your 2C for what he's going to cost.

Korchinski, Rinzell, DelMastro can all provide offense. And Jones is likely around for at least 4 more years too.


To clarify

I see his floor as a really good 3C who can be a 2C in a pinch. Not really sure what it would cost, but I think he’s worth looking into.
Hawksguy81 et LivingAnew a aimé ceci.
Voir tout