SalarySwishSalarySwish

Who is untouchable

Créé par: Claesson4Norris
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 26 févr. 2024
Publié: 26 févr. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
My list of how untouchable this roster down into tiers.

Tiers:

Don't Ask: self explanatory. Your absolute core, these guys are absolutely off limits. Tkachuk, Stützle and Sanderson are all obvious, but I've included Giroux and Pinto here as well. Giroux is as untouchable as he wishes to be. If he wants to be moved you move him, but he came here to finish career in his home, so unless he says otherwise you don't even consider it.

Not Available: Again, pretty self explanatory. These are mostly still your extended core, just not quite as important as the guys ahead of them. Two highly important young guys in Pinto and Greig. I'd actually debated having Pinto in the top tier because I think his upside is really high, and I think he's primed to sign a very team friendly long term deal given how the season has gone for him. Then you have one of the best defensive Dmen in the league and Ottawa's only RHD in Zub, and a top 6 winger making about 60% of what he should be. Joseph may feel out place here, but I really feel this is the right tier. Dude plays his game every single night, whether he's playing 1st line with Stützle or 3rd line with Rourke Chartier, he's arguably Ottawa's most consistent forward this season. On top of that his game is something Ottawa needs more of. Speed, grit, defensive commitment. He's not unreadable per se, but Ottawa's definitely not finding a better way to spend 2.95mil for the next 2⅓ seasons if you do move him.

Available, Big Hockey Trade: I'll start of by adding the caveat that it's either/or with Chychrun and Chabot. One of them should be dealt, and the other one should be in the tier above. Currently I'm leaning toward keeping Chabot. His contract is harder to move, he's a bigger part of the team's leadership group, he's been here forever and frankly he's having a better season. Norris is on here because there's been so much chatter about Andlauer looking at shaking up the forward core, and with Ottawa's two younger Cs looking so strong this season, Norris is the obvious choice. The goal of moving him or Chychrun is to address the two biggest areas of concern, getting a bonafide starter and a big minute responsible RHD. I have no interest in moving either guy for futures. The time starts now, we're done selling on promise, they need established guys who will deliver results if they're moving either.

Not Untouchable, But Not Valueable Assets: essentially guys who I'm not at all opposed to moving on from, but who probably provide the team more value than they would ever get from a trade. Do I love what Forsberg's done this season since returning from double knee surgery? (Thanks Hamonic btw) No, but he's been much better of late, and he's far from the primary concern in net. Is Parker Kelly some integral part of this team? No, but he's probably worth like a 6th, and he's been a very effective 4th liner for Jacques Martin, and the players all love him. Is JBD ever gonna develop into the top 4 defenseman he looked like in college? No, but he's a cheap 7th D, and we already know teams don't value him, he's been on waivers multiple times.

Trade Deadline Fodder: Again, self explanatory. Guys of varying levels of value, but they don't need to be here after this season. Tarasenko has been a great Sen, so idk maybe if he's taking a pay cut you look at keeping him, but I don't get the sense they will, and he'll fetch a great return. I'll die on the hill that Erik Brannstrom is a great 3rd pair defensive Dman with very strong underlying numbers, but I want Ottawa to rebuild that 3rd pair in the summer, and frankly I'm beyond sick of this fanbase rehashing the Brannstrom debate every time the team has more than 2 days off. He could easily be a guy you keep, I'm just sick of hearing the same arguments. Kastelic is a shell of the player he was last season. Last year he had fire, he was physical and engaged every night. This year he's felt so complacent and unmotivated. But he's still a 6'4 C who is elite in the faceoff dot and can punch decently well, Ottawa will get something. Such a shame he couldn't figure out his game here though, last year's Mark Kastelic was someone I'd have been excited to have in a playoff series. He'll probably go to Tampa and become awesome or whatever. Kubalik is one of the most useless hockey players I've ever seen wear a Sens jersey. I knew before they got him all he had to his game was a shot, but I was not prepared for how completely disinterested he would be about playing the sport he gets paid millions of dollars to play. He's shown less effort here than Derek Stepan, and Stepan literally dogged it on purpose because he was a massive baby about playing in Canada during the COVID season. hopefully they get some sucker to give them a pick, if not waive him on deadline day and never show me his face again.

Buyout Candidate: Very obvious. Go away, I hate you being on this team.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Dont Even, Ask
11 000 000 $
Not, Available
11 000 000 $
Available, Big hockey trade
11 000 000 $
Not Untouchable, But not valuable assets
11 000 000 $
Trade Deadline, Fodder
11 000 000 $
Buyout, Candidate
11 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1983 500 000 $80 867 380 $0 $1 850 000 $2 632 620 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Dont Even, Ask
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Not, Available
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Available, Big hockey trade
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Not Untouchable, But not valuable assets
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Trade Deadline, Fodder
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Buyout, Candidate
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

26 févr. à 9 h 43
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,303
Mentions "j'aime": 24,132
100% agree here

Also if they were ever considering moving Tkachuk , it would take a piece to build around with Stutzle and Sanderson meaning it would have to be Nemec or McTavish level piece. Or someone like Pettersson .

Otherwise don’t bother
26 févr. à 9 h 43
#2
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,577
Mentions "j'aime": 3,018
Hot take but I would switch Norris and Batherson
26 févr. à 9 h 50
#3
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,303
Mentions "j'aime": 24,132
Quoting: Borocop
Hot take but I would switch Norris and Batherson


I would move either in a hockey trade. But none of them are available if the offer is a 1st + prospect
Borocop a aimé ceci.
26 févr. à 10 h 27
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,929
Mentions "j'aime": 1,544
Quoting: Borocop
Hot take but I would switch Norris and Batherson


find a under 25 60+ point winger that makes under 5M that wont cost what or more than what you would get for Bath then you can think about trading Bath, untill them, trading Bath would make chiarelli look like a genius lvl GM.
Borocop a aimé ceci.
26 févr. à 10 h 27
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,929
Mentions "j'aime": 1,544
agree with this lists
Voir tout