SalarySwishSalarySwish

future

Équipe: 2025-26 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 22 janv. 2024
Publié: 22 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
3950 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
2950 000 $
2950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
74 677 500 $
53 750 000 $
1975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
14 150 000 $
37 800 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lindstrom, Cayden
3950 000 $
Martone, Porter
3950 000 $
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2393 500 000 $56 743 333 $0 $5 005 000 $36 756 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA
Lindstrom, Cayden
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 1
7 800 000 $7 800 000 $
AG
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Martone, Porter
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
825 000 $825 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 677 500 $4 677 500 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
RFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
855 833 $855 833 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
895 000 $895 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
846 667 $846 667 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

22 janv. à 18 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,275
Mentions "j'aime": 2,228
If we don't draft a RD this draft and go with Lindstrom, you gotta go Logan Hensler in 2025, assuming we are drafting that high, which it looks like you are projecting that. Verhaege would be sick if you can pry him from Florida. I would rather see Bedard at 1C and Lindstrom at 2C, with Verhaege and Nazar flanking bedard and Kurashev and Moore flanking Lindstrom. Then you have some combo of Greene, Dach, Lardis, Dickinson, Foligno, and Slaggert on the bottom 6.

Agree on the goalie situation. Just keeping signing Mrazek to 1 or 2 year deals until one of the kids can prove themself in any capacity in the NHL. Looks like Soderblom isn't the guy. Rinse and repeat with Commesso and then if need be Gajan.
Garak et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
22 janv. à 18 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,363
Mentions "j'aime": 11,362
Pretty harsh you didn't re-sign Reichel...
SlickWilly et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
22 janv. à 18 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,275
Mentions "j'aime": 2,228
Quoting: Garak
Pretty harsh you didn't re-sign Reichel...


Cant believe i didnt notice that. Also insanely shortsighted to not re-sign him given how he looked last year
Garak et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
22 janv. à 18 h 32
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,363
Mentions "j'aime": 11,362
Quoting: SlickWilly
If we don't draft a RD this draft and go with Lindstrom, you gotta go Logan Hensler in 2025, assuming we are drafting that high, which it looks like you are projecting that. Verhaege would be sick if you can pry him from Florida. I would rather see Bedard at 1C and Lindstrom at 2C, with Verhaege and Nazar flanking bedard and Kurashev and Moore flanking Lindstrom. Then you have some combo of Greene, Dach, Lardis, Dickinson, Foligno, and Slaggert on the bottom 6.

Agree on the goalie situation. Just keeping signing Mrazek to 1 or 2 year deals until one of the kids can prove themself in any capacity in the NHL. Looks like Soderblom isn't the guy. Rinse and repeat with Commesso and then if need be Gajan.


I think RD depth is an important thing to address for CHI, but I don't think we need to worry about an RD1 for a while. Plus, if we can either trade up to get a third 1st round pick or get Emery in the 2nd round, we'll be in pretty good shape. But, yeah, I agree. Bedard is likely gonna stick at C. Lindstrom would be 2C. Nazar is likely gonna be a top 6 forward. When CHI is a better team, Kurashev will likely be a 3rd line forward, if he is even still here.
SlickWilly et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
22 janv. à 18 h 34
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,363
Mentions "j'aime": 11,362
Quoting: SlickWilly
Cant believe i didnt notice that. Also insanely shortsighted to not re-sign him given how he looked last year


Right? That was no fluke. The kid is just having a rough season after putting on a decent amount of weight and being thrust into a completely different role. No matter what people say and what the lineups from last season say, Sorensen was not playing him at C in Rockford. I watched enough Rockford games to know he had almost no real center experience coming into this season.
SlickWilly et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
Voir tout