SalarySwishSalarySwish

Should they sign Drouin before he gets more expensive

Créé par: Anus_McLeod
Équipe: 2024-25 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 5 janv. 2024
Publié: 5 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Dude has been playing well (believe he has 11 points in his last 10). I have always assumed it would be a one year stay for him, but I'm not so sure now.

Trades are half assed. Manson has been good, so I think a 3rd from some team is reasonable. The Sharks trade is also just more of a placeholder. Might take more or less depending on performance up until the deadline.

Team is deep but has questions for middle six C. Not sure that gets solved tbh.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
1775 000 $
13 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (TOR)
2.
COL
    Mainly illustrating that RyJo goes at the prior TDL. Thinking this type of package for Duclair or someone like that.
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    2025
    Logo de COL
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    2026
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de COL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2287 500 000 $87 416 250 $0 $137 500 $83 750 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    12 600 000 $12 600 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
    AD, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C
    RFA
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    896 250 $896 250 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    775 000 $775 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    775 000 $775 000 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    870 000 $870 000 $ (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
    C, AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    775 000 $775 000 $
    DG
    UFA
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
    925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG
    RFA - 3

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    5 janv. à 12 h 15
    #1
    Rip
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2022
    Messages: 11,240
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,020
    If Manson isn't good enough for the Avs, why would TO pay to take him?
    SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
    5 janv. à 12 h 22
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
    Quoting: RipNasty
    If Manson isn't good enough for the Avs, why would TO pay to take him?


    He is good enough for the Avs. They'd love to keep him. The cap doesn't allow for keeping everyone though, and I personally see a good fit in Toronto (depending on what else happens with guys like Brodie, Timmins, etc. of course).
    TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    5 janv. à 12 h 29
    #3
    Rip
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2022
    Messages: 11,240
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,020
    Quoting: Anus_McLeod
    He is good enough for the Avs. They'd love to keep him. The cap doesn't allow for keeping everyone though, and I personally see a good fit in Toronto (depending on what else happens with guys like Brodie, Timmins, etc. of course).


    You keep him if he's a value contract. At 4.5 million he needs to either be a highly effective shutdown defenceman or a top pair defenceman. He's in his decline years and obviously isn't providing enough value which is why you want to trade him. Judging by his age and how he's viewed by you guys. It's pretty clear you are already seeing diminishing returns on the contract he signed after the cup win.

    So what you are doing is trying to sell him as a good fit based on his past play knowing full well that he isn't providing value at his current cap hit. And seeing his age you know that isn't going to get better over the next 2 years of his 4.5 million dollar deal.

    Now that that is out of the way, why would a contender want to add a contract that doesn't provide value.
    SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
    5 janv. à 12 h 47
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2017
    Messages: 27,786
    Mentions "j'aime": 14,518
    Quoting: RipNasty
    You keep him if he's a value contract. At 4.5 million he needs to either be a highly effective shutdown defenceman or a top pair defenceman. He's in his decline years and obviously isn't providing enough value which is why you want to trade him. Judging by his age and how he's viewed by you guys. It's pretty clear you are already seeing diminishing returns on the contract he signed after the cup win.

    So what you are doing is trying to sell him as a good fit based on his past play knowing full well that he isn't providing value at his current cap hit. And seeing his age you know that isn't going to get better over the next 2 years of his 4.5 million dollar deal.

    Now that that is out of the way, why would a contender want to add a contract that doesn't provide value.


    Seems like a treviling guy

    Also, what contender?
    TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    5 janv. à 12 h 57
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 3,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,444
    Quoting: RipNasty
    You keep him if he's a value contract. At 4.5 million he needs to either be a highly effective shutdown defenceman or a top pair defenceman. He's in his decline years and obviously isn't providing enough value which is why you want to trade him. Judging by his age and how he's viewed by you guys. It's pretty clear you are already seeing diminishing returns on the contract he signed after the cup win.

    So what you are doing is trying to sell him as a good fit based on his past play knowing full well that he isn't providing value at his current cap hit. And seeing his age you know that isn't going to get better over the next 2 years of his 4.5 million dollar deal.

    Now that that is out of the way, why would a contender want to add a contract that doesn't provide value.


    He has more points from the blue line than anyone on the Leafs not named Reilly. He'd be a good add there. Only reason the Avs would move him is because they already have Makar, Toews, Girard, and Byram. Just because one team can't afford to keep a guy doesn't mean he's trash.
    SomeonesOffended, M96N29 et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
    Voir tout