SalarySwishSalarySwish

Gibson

Créé par: gaz
Équipe: 2023-24 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 14 déc. 2023
Publié: 14 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
NJD
  1. Gibson, John (400 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Hämeenaho, Lenni [Liste de réserve]
  2. Miller, Colin
  3. Vanecek, Vitek
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de COL
Logo de NJD
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2026
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $81 155 000 $422 500 $5 482 500 $2 345 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
775 000 $775 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

14 déc. 2023 à 13 h 27
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,312
Mentions "j'aime": 18,394
Take out Miller. Putting Smith back there full time doesn’t help us.

And add enough retention to get Gibson in $4m-$4.5m range.
14 déc. 2023 à 13 h 43
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,430
Mentions "j'aime": 25,334
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Take out Miller. Putting Smith back there full time doesn’t help us.

And add enough retention to get Gibson in $4m-$4.5m range.

I don't think that you're getting Gibson with that much retention unless Anaheim is getting a significant asset back; a 2025 first doesn't do it and you're not about to trade any of your 4 youngsters whose last name begins with the letter "H." Miller is a nice idea as a stopgap, but inasmuch as the Ducks have two RhD prospects on the Canadian team for next month's World Juniors plus Gudas and Lyubushkin, he's a UFA, and you need him more than we do, he can be left out of this deal, but doing so, of course, increases the need for retention on Gibson. So I think that at a minimum, you'd have to send the 2024 first and add Clarke or Stillman (depending upon who the Ducks feel is the better prospect) to Vanecek and the Finnish kid. Since the Ducks really have no pressing need to divest themselves of Gibson, especially if retaining up to $1.6 million (they won't retain more), I think that the offer for him has to be a significant and appealing one.
14 déc. 2023 à 13 h 50
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,312
Mentions "j'aime": 18,394
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I don't think that you're getting Gibson with that much retention unless Anaheim is getting a significant asset back; a 2025 first doesn't do it and you're not about to trade any of your 4 youngsters whose last name begins with the letter "H." Miller is a nice idea as a stopgap, but inasmuch as the Ducks have two RhD prospects on the Canadian team for next month's World Juniors plus Gudas and Lyubushkin, he's a UFA, and you need him more than we do, he can be left out of this deal, but doing so, of course, increases the need for retention on Gibson. So I think that at a minimum, you'd have to send the 2024 first and add Clarke or Stillman (depending upon who the Ducks feel is the better prospect) to Vanecek and the Finnish kid. Since the Ducks really have no pressing need to divest themselves of Gibson, especially if retaining up to $1.6 million (they won't retain more), I think that the offer for him has to be a significant and appealing one.


Do that…but with $2.6m retained instead of $1.6m.

Our cap is going to get tight in Gibsons last two years with Mercer, Hughes Holtz all getting big raises. Play around with 2025-26 NJD lineup and you will see how every dollar will matter.

EDIT - our “cap” not our “gap”
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 déc. 2023 à 13 h 51
#4
I Love J Boqvist
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 11,953
Mentions "j'aime": 3,157
Modifié 14 déc. 2023 à 13 h 56
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I don't think that you're getting Gibson with that much retention unless Anaheim is getting a significant asset back; a 2025 first doesn't do it and you're not about to trade any of your 4 youngsters whose last name begins with the letter "H." Miller is a nice idea as a stopgap, but inasmuch as the Ducks have two RhD prospects on the Canadian team for next month's World Juniors plus Gudas and Lyubushkin, he's a UFA, and you need him more than we do, he can be left out of this deal, but doing so, of course, increases the need for retention on Gibson. So I think that at a minimum, you'd have to send the 2024 first and add Clarke or Stillman (depending upon who the Ducks feel is the better prospect) to Vanecek and the Finnish kid. Since the Ducks really have no pressing need to divest themselves of Gibson, especially if retaining up to $1.6 million (they won't retain more), I think that the offer for him has to be a significant and appealing one.


Again I think the big gap here is that ducks fans are viewing gibson as a +ve value asset and the retention as costing more on top of that.
We view gibson as a negative asset at his full cap hit, and the retention being the only thing making him tradable at all.

I think if John Gibson hit waivers today he'd go unclaimed

I think if John gibson were a free agent this past offseason he wouldn't get more than 4.5-5 mill

I think if Gibson were an upcoming UFA he wouldn't get more than 5.5.

In terms of Vanacek.

I think if he was a free agent this past offseason he'd have gotten at least 4

I think if he was a free agent this coming offseason he'd get at least 2-2.5

And I think if he hit waivers one or multiple of Columbus, Toronto, Chicago, put in a claim
14 déc. 2023 à 13 h 53
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,430
Mentions "j'aime": 25,334
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Do that…but with $2.6m retained instead of $1.6m.

Our gap is going to get tight in Gibsons last two years with Mercer, Hughes Holtz all getting big raises. Play around with 2025-26 NJD lineup and you will see how every dollar will matter.

I knew that you're familiar with Anaheim's financial practices, so I assumed that it was something like that. It's hard to work out a deal that would satisfy both sides economically, but I haven't checked your recent post on the subject, so maybe you have the solution. I'll go see.
Voir tout