SalarySwishSalarySwish

Next off-season assuming this season goes south

Créé par: AC14
Équipe: 2024-25 Blues de St-Louis
Date de création initiale: 27 août 2023
Publié: 28 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
This is under the assumption the Blues don't forsee re-signing Buchnevich. Tried to fit the mold of the Timo Meier trade.

Justification of pieces involved
Picks - Self explanatory.
Pickering = Mukhamadullin
Eller = Johnsson
POJ = Zetterlund (possibly)
Broz = Okhotiuk

Tucker = Harrington. Younger player with team control who can adequately fill the void on the bottom pair for Pitt.

Few differences - Meier expired as an RFA
Pro for NJ - definite team control.
Dispute of difference - Qualifying offer was 10m. Buchnevich will not command 10m for term.

Meier was a bit younger. Pro - possibly a year or two more productive throughout term on long-term extension.
Dispute of difference - Meier has enough NHL experience to more or less know what you're getting there.

Buchnevich isn't the goal scorer Meier possibly is, however, he is a legitimate 3 zone player.

From my perspective, I would rather the Blues re-sign Buch long-term. I don't necessarily thing that POJ would be a deal breaker for the Blues, Considered swapping him out for Poulin. Broz also not necessary. Was the closest I could find for the Meier trade in regards to Okhutiok.

Yes this is a bit pricy for a rental. However, this is a full season with 50% eaten on the contract. To be completed between 24' draft and free agency opening (Around that time frame).

Pros for Pittsburgh - Gives flexibility to build a core that can be competitive sooner rather than later centered around Buchnevich and Guentzel.
Gives highly productive piece for their still competitive window with Crosby + Malkin + EK + letang. Allows Buchnevich to stay in an environment where he is getting alot of ice time like he has in STL where he has thrived.

Cons for Pittsburgh - Large futures package to move. Buchnevich would have to be part of future plans. Pittsburgh would lack a top end Center post-Crosby era.

Regardless of if the Blues are competitive next season or they continue a downswing, Buchnevich can fit a winning time frame for the Blues. The forward group they currently have to term along with the Prospects they have in the system are pretty inevitable that the offense will be above average to great within at the most 3 years. Buch will be in the first year of a new contract in 3 years and he will only be 30. It's not unrealistic to think he will have at minimum 4 very highly productive years still in him. None of the pieces involved here will have the individual impact Buchnevich will and what's often overlooked is that if you're generally replacing guys through UFA to fit the top of your lineup it's a very high liklihood the contract will NOT be pretty. Keeping Buchnevicih internally is probably the best option. Just wanted to see what the general consensus was here.


LATE EDIT: FORGOT TO SIGN POJ.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2775 000 $
2775 000 $
3775 000 $
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
2775 000 $
21 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 500 000 $
77 000 000 $
31 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
STL
  1. Broz, Tristan [Liste de réserve]
  2. Eller, Lars
  3. Joseph, Pierre-Olivier [Droits de RFA]
  4. Pickering, Owen
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
  6. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (PIT)
  7. Choix de 2e ronde en 2026 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
2025 1st round pick top 5 protected. Pittsburgh can defer to unprotected 2026 1st round pick if 2025 falls in top 5.
PIT
  1. Buchnevich, Pavel (2 900 000 $ retained)
  2. Tucker, Tyler
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (STL)
2.
STL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (NYI)
Détails additionnels:
Vrana at TDL 50% retained.
NYI
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de STL
Logo de NYR
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
2025
Logo de STL
Logo de PIT
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de NYI
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de PIT
2026
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de PIT
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
Logo de STL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2385 000 000 $85 145 595 $0 $412 500 $-145 595 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
835 833 $835 833 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
950 000 $950 000 $
AD, C
RFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 8
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
775 000 $775 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG
RFA
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
AG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

28 août 2023 à 11 h 25
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,705
Mentions "j'aime": 994
The Penguins are not paying that for a single season of Buchnevich. That's ridiculous.
SydBarrett a aimé ceci.
28 août 2023 à 11 h 30
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,781
Mentions "j'aime": 1,420
Quoting: brgh4life
The Penguins are not paying that for a single season of Buchnevich. That's ridiculous.


It's with the assumption of extending for term. That being said, I did it primarily as a comparative to Timo Meier which was done at the deadline. I don't think POJ/Broz are really necessary nor is Eller. Eller was mainly for cap relief, not sure if it's necessary either.

You'd have to assume getting a legitimate 3 zone 1st line wing with term along with a young 4-7 defenseman is worth Pickering + assumed later 1st + later 2nd the following season.
28 août 2023 à 12 h 35
#3
Syd Barret
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 1,000
Mentions "j'aime": 481
No chance penguins make that trade lmao come on now. A 1st, a 2nd, three of our top four prospects, for a rental player? since when does a rental fetch that kind of return
28 août 2023 à 12 h 45
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,781
Mentions "j'aime": 1,420
Quoting: pensburgh571
No chance penguins make that trade lmao come on now. A 1st, a 2nd, three of our top four prospects, for a rental player? since when does a rental fetch that kind of return


I lined out in the description the reasoning behind it. Yes it’s 3 of your better prospects. But with one of the worst pools in the league it’s pretty on par with exactly the Meier trade.
28 août 2023 à 12 h 56
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,385
Mentions "j'aime": 1,016
Quoting: AC14
It's with the assumption of extending for term. That being said, I did it primarily as a comparative to Timo Meier which was done at the deadline. I don't think POJ/Broz are really necessary nor is Eller. Eller was mainly for cap relief, not sure if it's necessary either.

You'd have to assume getting a legitimate 3 zone 1st line wing with term along with a young 4-7 defenseman is worth Pickering + assumed later 1st + later 2nd the following season.


If you'd accept a return of a 1st, 2nd, and Pickering - I definitely think it would be worth consideration. But I know I'm a lot more "go all in" than a lot of Pens fans haha
Voir tout