SalarySwishSalarySwish

Cost of these players

Créé par: JTrades
Équipe: 2022-23 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 28 déc. 2022
Publié: 28 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I'm not saying these player are available I'm trying to find player that aren't talked about all the time but that there is maybe a small chance that get traded. So, someone like Patrick Kane can't make it onto this team.

Choose a player and answer these questions
1. What has to happen for them to be traded?
2. What would it take to aquire them?
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1182 500 000 $33 909 167 $0 $4 000 000 $48 590 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

28 déc. 2022 à 9 h 51
#1
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,666
Mentions "j'aime": 3,483
There are 2 outliers here: Jarvis and Byfield. Why would their respective teams even consider trading them? Byfield is likely Kopitar’s replacement in the long run, and Jarvis has limitless potential only in his sophomore year. Those 2 are likely untouchables, and Jarvis is definitely an untouchable.

Newhook could develop into a great 2C, but he has struggled so far this year, so I don’t think the Avs move without an overpay, provided they can manage their cap properly. As for everyone else, who knows? Maybe a plate of bacon and a strawberry smoothie? Value is bit hard to judge.
28 déc. 2022 à 9 h 54
#2
Avid Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 632
Mentions "j'aime": 314
Garland is probably available right now. Cost from a fan perspective would be either a really good prospect (ie. Project that could pan out as top 6 center or top 4 D) and probably a 2nd this year or 2nd next year plus. An example that wasn't hated that I proposed a while ago from New Jersey Garland for Bahl, Thomson, and a 2nd in 2023
28 déc. 2022 à 10 h 0
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,638
Mentions "j'aime": 585
Quoting: evelutions2
There are 2 outliers here: Jarvis and Byfield. Why would their respective teams even consider trading them? Byfield is likely Kopitar’s replacement in the long run, and Jarvis has limitless potential only in his sophomore year. Those 2 are likely untouchables, and Jarvis is definitely an untouchable.

Newhook could develop into a great 2C, but he has struggled so far this year, so I don’t think the Avs move without an overpay, provided they can manage their cap properly. As for everyone else, who knows? Maybe a plate of bacon and a strawberry smoothie? Value is bit hard to judge.


Your assessment is correct, but as always on here the word "untouchable" is thrown around way too loosely. Mcdavid, AM34, Mack are untouchables.

Now of course carolina and LA are in no means looking to trade those guys and would need a great offer to move them. But not untouchable
28 déc. 2022 à 10 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 1,062
Mentions "j'aime": 353
Are they likely to be traded? No but, I'm always skeptical on teams trying to win now like Carolina. Obviously they would need a big piece to movie Jarvis but, they want to win now and likely any team trading with them wants him. As for LA. He hasn't exactly been what they were hoping for. Way too early to call him a bust or anything but would they consider trading him while his value is still high? Just my though process. The fact that you didn't say these players are talked about all the time makes me happy lol
28 déc. 2022 à 11 h 13
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,274
Mentions "j'aime": 2,966
Jarvis is likely our long term replacement for Teuvo so I doubt he is moved. If we are moving him, we would likely be acquiring a 90-100 point player that is controllable.
JTrades et evelutions2 a aimé ceci.
Voir tout