SalarySwishSalarySwish

Should Eklund follow Stutzles path

Créé par: yikes
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 25 août 2022
Publié: 25 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I think if Eklund can get some reps on the wing while being expected to transition to Center could help Eklund not only build confidence but also play a more complete and expected role with the team. And with better depth this year the Sharks can provide him capable wingers immediately in Lindblom and Kunin, one complete 200ft player and a scoring grinder in Kunin who also can protect the kid.

I’m personally really intrigued to see if this is where SJ goes. Some games with Hertl/ Meier with consistent PP time to give him high quality linemates.

Where this gets sketchy is obviously Center is a more demanding role and if it goes poorly it leaves more pressure on Eklunds shoulders. Obviously he would be moved back to LW if this happens but it could further throw more wrenches into his path and that’s already happened all of last year with the brutal club he was with. It would be a defined role but a more critical role to take on.

I think Eklunds improved size will only help with this transition but he does need to thrive and if he can’t thrive here it’s only going to be more stress mentally for a kid who wanted to be with the team full time last season. It could be better to give him AHL C time with Bordeleau and bring both in after some time in the A, but that leaves the Sharks with a weak NHL roster losing a high end talent.
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Brossoit, Laurent
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
3 way
VGK
  1. Nieto, Matt
  2. Reimer, James (1 125 000 $ retained)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $74 965 001 $0 $550 000 $7 534 999 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

25 août 2022 à 12 h 20
#1
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 866
Mentions "j'aime": 399
do you think Eklund makes more sense to play as a center long-term or should he stick to wing? I’m pretty sure while he was in the SHL he played center but don’t know if that was optimal for him.
25 août 2022 à 12 h 24
#2
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,124
Mentions "j'aime": 743
1. The Knights announced that they aren’t trading for a goalie.
2. Hawks already have a backup in Stalock.
25 août 2022 à 12 h 25
#3
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,093
Mentions "j'aime": 12,835
Quoting: SJSGM
do you think Eklund makes more sense to play as a center long-term or should he stick to wing? I’m pretty sure while he was in the SHL he played center but don’t know if that was optimal for him.

I don’t think either is the right or wrong path - it all depends on how he performs which is why AHL time may be a better introduction to Center and giving him linemates like Gushchin or Coe would be a huge plus.

For his career he may be more comfortable and long term safety at LW, but if he can transition to a C; as we’re seeing with Timmy. It would be more than career changing but also much more lucrative to Eklund and the team. More money and more demand for Cs and Eklund would only have legitimate competition from Bordeleau. Hertls our true #1 but Couture can transition to a 3C or winger easily.
SJSGM a aimé ceci.
25 août 2022 à 12 h 26
#4
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,093
Mentions "j'aime": 12,835
Quoting: Scooter81
1. The Knights announced that they aren’t trading for a goalie.
2. Hawks already have a backup in Stalock.


The Knights also said they’re keeping Fleury.
The Hawks are tanking, really doesn’t matter if they believe they can flip Laurent if he has some decent games whereas Stalock is not an asset that will return anything.
25 août 2022 à 12 h 29
#5
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,124
Mentions "j'aime": 743
If this happened my lines would be.

LW W.Eklund C T.Hertl RW A.Barabanov
LW T.Meier C L.Couture RW L.Kunin
LW M.Nieto C T.Bordeleau RW N.Gregor
LW O.Lindblom C N.Sturm RW S.Lorentz

LD M.Ferraro RD E.Karlsson
LD R.Simek RD R.Merkley
LD M.Nutivaara RD M.Benning

G K.Kähkönen
G A.Hill
Voir tout