Kerfoot to wild

No.

Irregardless of whether Kerfoot is a good player or not. He is. But the single reason he's likely to be moved is for cap reasons. That makes him a cap dump.

You pay the other team to take him off your hands, you're not getting a B-level prospect plus cap compliancy when you're GM is up against the wall.

Besides, the Wild already have Hartman and Eriksson-Ek. Two players just like Kerfoot, that are just as good. And a prospect like Rossi likely making the team out of camp next month, why block him?

Informative...

Re-read it, then.

In no way is kerfoot a cap dump. Your logic is flawed. Didn't your team move Fiala for the same reason? How much did you need to pay to move him?

Whether or not he would be useful to the wild is a valid argument. Next to know cash owed and expiring after this season makes him a good fit contract wise. Considering he can play anywhere in the lineup and Wild are short on nhl forwards it makes sense to me anyway.

For you guys Kerfoot IS a cap dump. You guys have depth scoring issues, so you're going to move a third line winger? That's a cap dump.