Blockbuster

1st Knight and Tippett is probably fair for Chychrun. Probably have to add a bit more for Kessel retained

Eason from Florida as Knight is t going to be part of any trade and neither is Lundell.

I don't know. I'm really split on it, to be honest. Aside from if Bobrovsky gets hurt, is there ever going to be a scenario over the next 4 years where he makes more than 35-40 starts? Is that really more valuable than filling the Panthers 1 true hole, LD? Honestly, if I'm Arizona, that deal has the potential to turn around and bite me in the @ss if Knight doesn't bounce back from how poorly he has played this year.

Edit: Prospects are for peasants.

I proposed something similar in a different thread, but had Samoskevich in instead of Schwindt under these conditions.

Knight, Samoskevich/Tippett and 1st is fair in my mind. Tippett seems to be a piece available now, so maybe the trade is for Tippett. I really like Samoskevich, though. By adding Kessel and retaining 50% a value of a 2nd+ is added in my mind. Then we take back Vatrano/Hörnqvist and maybe get the value to a 1st. Is it enough to make the trade Knight, Samoskevich, Tippett and 1st? I think so, but could see the hesitation from Florida. I wouldn't mind adding a pick from our side to even it out. One of our late 2nds or our 3rd. I wouldn't mind skipping the extra pick and replacing Tippett with Nause, but it doesn't look to be the case.

So in short; Chychrun, Kessel (@50%) and 2nd/3rd for Knight, Samoskevich, Tippett, Vatrano/Hörnqvist and 1st.

Think you'd need to take on Hornqvist or Franky Vats for salary purposes, no? I feel like I read that in your post though...