SalarySwishSalarySwish

Going into the playoffs

Créé par: CoolHandL
Équipe: 2021-22 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 21 janv. 2022
Publié: 21 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
PHI
  1. Khusnutdinov, Marat [Liste de réserve]
  2. Rask, Victor
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2024
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 254 421 $0 $682 500 $3 245 579 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 137 500 $4 137 500 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
825 833 $825 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
795 000 $795 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

21 janv. 2022 à 15 h 4
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,673
Mentions "j'aime": 1,920
Cant be Khusnutdinov. Too valuable of a prospect. I don’t think MN should be trading futures, but if they were to pursue G, I think it’s one of [O Rourke, Hunt, maaaaybe Beckman or obviously anyone lesser, Pillar, Bankier, etc].
TanSor et dlt_hfu2847whsba a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2022 à 15 h 7
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 433
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: drmantalban
Cant be Khusnutdinov. Too valuable of a prospect. I don’t think MN should be trading futures, but if they were to pursue G, I think it’s one of [O Rourke, Hunt, maaaaybe Beckman or obviously anyone lesser, Pillar, Bankier, etc].


It'd have to be at least one big future - I waffled between Khusnutdinov and a Hunt/O'Rourke... hoping it would be one of those defensemen instead, for sure. I figure they'd be ok giving up the 1st because they can trade Fiala in the summer for another one.
MNCountryClub, TanSor et B_seka17 a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2022 à 15 h 10
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,673
Mentions "j'aime": 1,920
Quoting: CoolHandL
It'd have to be at least one big future - I waffled between Khusnutdinov and a Hunt/O'Rourke... hoping it would be one of those defensemen instead, for sure. I figure they'd be ok giving up the 1st because they can trade Fiala in the summer for another one.


Yeah I think if you want Giroux, it’s roughly a 1st and a B type prospect. But IMO, MIN absolutely should not include Khust for a rental. I’d really rather they didn’t go get a rental, but if it has to happen, Marats in my list of untouchables.
TanSor et CoolHandL a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2022 à 15 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: CoolHandL
It'd have to be at least one big future - I waffled between Khusnutdinov and a Hunt/O'Rourke... hoping it would be one of those defensemen instead, for sure. I figure they'd be ok giving up the 1st because they can trade Fiala in the summer for another one.


And that's exactly why I think acquiring Giroux is a bad idea. We need all the ELC players we can get and while Giroux would be great there's no way we can keep him past this year. If we trade Fiala in the offseason to recoup assets spent on Giroux then we're essentially just offloading Fiala for nothing long-term.

I think I'm in a minority amongst Wild fans but I really don't like the idea of acquiring a rental for a 1st + a good prospect. The Hanzal trade probably ruined that idea forever for me...
MNCountryClub et CoolHandL a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2022 à 15 h 20
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 433
Mentions "j'aime": 275
Quoting: TanSor
And that's exactly why I think acquiring Giroux is a bad idea. We need all the ELC players we can get and while Giroux would be great there's no way we can keep him past this year. If we trade Fiala in the offseason to recoup assets spent on Giroux then we're essentially just offloading Fiala for nothing long-term.

I think I'm in a minority amongst Wild fans but I really don't like the idea of acquiring a rental for a 1st + a good prospect. The Hanzal trade probably ruined that idea forever for me...


I hear you about Hanzal, that stung bad. Giroux is a whole other level (and temperament) of player though. I do think it is more likely that Guerin does not make this kind of rental move, but if they really want to go for the cup this spring I think this kind of trade has to be looked at.
TanSor et MNCountryClub a aimé ceci.
Voir tout