SalarySwishSalarySwish

A rough idea

Créé par: Bias_it_self
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 26 déc. 2021
Publié: 4 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I'm fully aware I'll take flak for this, but I want to try a different trade idea.

I'd say Fiala's value is at around 1st and a 2nd. Marat K is around a late 1st. Hertl is worth two 1st and Barabanov is at around two 2nds. Minnesota moves Fiala for a cheaper replacement and a 1C. Hertl and Barabanov work well together and could both be resigned; Hertl at round 7.5~8mil for 6-7 years, while Barabanov could look to take a shorter deal at around 3mil for 3 years. They could be played with Kaprizov and give them a scary top line with a 1-2 punch of Hertl and JEK. Sharks get a younger winger to play with Meier and form a Swiss duo of sorts. They also bring in another highly rated C prospect that fills an organizational need. I put Scott Reedy between the two Swiss wingers because he's shown he has a scoring touch in the AHL and given the chance to play between two talented wingers, he has every reason to flourish.
Transactions
SJS
  1. Fiala, Kevin
  2. Khusnutdinov, Marat [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (MIN)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $62 237 030 $0 $377 500 $19 262 970 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
783 333 $783 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

4 janv. 2022 à 4 h 5
#1
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,336
Mentions "j'aime": 5,672
I think you've overpriced Hertl here, but I don't hate the general idea. In fact, I almost wonder if Hertl for Fiala 1-for would work. Value balances out thanks to RFA vs UFA status and whatnot, plus Fiala is a major bounce back candidate.
4 janv. 2022 à 4 h 13
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,184
Mentions "j'aime": 3,665
Quoting: Random2152
I think you've overpriced Hertl here, but I don't hate the general idea. In fact, I almost wonder if Hertl for Fiala 1-for would work. Value balances out thanks to RFA vs UFA status and whatnot, plus Fiala is a major bounce back candidate.


Sharks don’t consider Hertl for fiala 1 for 1
Bias_it_self et Klara a aimé ceci.
4 janv. 2022 à 4 h 18
#3
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,336
Mentions "j'aime": 5,672
Quoting: glarson17
Sharks don’t consider Hertl for fiala 1 for 1


I actually think you'd come out on top of that trade in the long run. Besides he is a UFA rental, you aren't getting nearly as much value as you want
4 janv. 2022 à 4 h 20
#4
Temple of Ferraro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 638
Mentions "j'aime": 336
Quoting: Random2152
I think you've overpriced Hertl here, but I don't hate the general idea. In fact, I almost wonder if Hertl for Fiala 1-for would work. Value balances out thanks to RFA vs UFA status and whatnot, plus Fiala is a major bounce back candidate.


Although I see where you’re coming from, I don’t think Fiala is worth the same value as Hertl. Hertl is far more skilled and drives play way more. He plays a position that’s valued much more and can be much more versatile, be it taking faceoffs or playing a 200ft game.

Edit: Also a trade like this would give Minnesota the space to resign Hertl.
4 janv. 2022 à 4 h 26
#5
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,336
Mentions "j'aime": 5,672
Quoting: Bias_it_self
Although I see where you’re coming from, I don’t think Fiala is worth the same value as Hertl. Hertl is far more skilled and drives play way more. He plays a position that’s valued much more and can be much more versatile, be it taking faceoffs or playing a 200ft game.


Short term, absolutely correct. Hertl is better and Fiala is in a rut. If they were both under control for (say) 3 years there is no way in hell. The problem is that MIN is getting 3 months from Hertl, vs the full control and expected bounce back of Fiala. That value skews in your direction big time long term, and that is with my 1-for trade, let alone yours.

Quoting: Bias_it_self
Edit: Also a trade like this would give Minnesota the space to resign Hertl.


And if he doesn't want to stay? Trading a guy without control, even if they could theoretically extend their control over him doesn't garner additional value. Moreover you seem to not fully understand the predicament the Wild are in cap wise. Due to adding $8M onto the cap next year from the buyouts they can't even afford Fiala as is, so no this move does not give them the space to extend Hertl's contract at $8M ish aav
Voir tout