SalarySwishSalarySwish

Small move

Créé par: MNCountryClub
Équipe: 2021-22 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 5 oct. 2021
Publié: 5 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Not really necessary, but clear some room so Dean isn’t tempted to overplay Rask
Transactions
MIN
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
OTT
  1. Rask, Victor
Détails additionnels:
Press box center insurance
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYI
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2024
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $72 458 919 $0 $600 000 $9 041 081 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
917 831 $917 831 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
725 000 $725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

5 oct. 2021 à 15 h 38
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,346
Mentions "j'aime": 3,385
Rask is still a better option than Bjugstad, Gaudreau, Pitlick, Rau, and Duhaime at the very least. If you move him, one of those is going to be the new, worse version of Rask.

I know it's fun to hate Rask, but let's just keep him until we actually have better options.
5 oct. 2021 à 15 h 40
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Colin White is also injured and the Sens probably could have used him even before that. No real risk for either side.
5 oct. 2021 à 15 h 43
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: Caerii
Rask is still a better option than Bjugstad, Gaudreau, Pitlick, Rau, and Duhaime at the very least. If you move him, one of those is going to be the new, worse version of Rask.

I know it's fun to hate Rask, but let's just keep him until we actually have better options.


As cynical as it is to say you won’t bench him or send him down due to his salary, that’s a real consideration for the team. It’s also the right thing to do by the player given he’s in his contract year.
5 oct. 2021 à 15 h 46
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,346
Mentions "j'aime": 3,385
Quoting: jnowariak
As cynical as it is to say you won’t bench him or send him down due to his salary, that’s a real consideration for the team. It’s also the right thing to do by the player given he’s in his contract year.


Who are you referring to? Rask is probably the 10th best forward on the team. He may sit a game here and there so other guys can stay in practice, but he's not going to be waived or benched unless he really screws up, and we're not hard up for cap space, so why would that factor in to any decision this season?
5 oct. 2021 à 15 h 52
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: Caerii
Who are you referring to? Rask is probably the 10th best forward on the team. He may sit a game here and there so other guys can stay in practice, but he's not going to be waived or benched unless he really screws up, and we're not hard up for cap space, so why would that factor in to any decision this season?


I am talking about Rask. I also agree that he’s probably the 10th best forward on the team as well. But if his preseason deployment on the wing is an indication of where he’ll play then it really sounds like he’s just filling space due to his contract. We can replace a 4th line forward easily and if Rask has the ability to play C in OTT, that means a whole lot more to him than him playing on the wing does for MIN. I do think that doing right by the player and giving him the opportunity is the right thing to do, and BG has done that often.
Voir tout