SalarySwishSalarySwish

2019 Draft Class

Créé par: Pleau2
Équipe: 2021-22 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 16 sept. 2021
Publié: 17 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $20 469 165 $0 $21 545 000 $61 030 835 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance62 500 $$62K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
825 833 $825 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
863 333 $863 333 $
DG
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance1 550 000 $$2M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

17 sept. 2021 à 13 h 59
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,389
Mentions "j'aime": 1,946
Seider > Söderström
Byram > Björnfot
Boldy > Krebs, Newhook
Kaliyev > Robertson, Foote, Pinto
Pleau2 a aimé ceci.
17 sept. 2021 à 14 h 41
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,449
Mentions "j'aime": 18,829
Such a loaded draft class.

Other late guys to consider:

Dustin Wolf
Adam Beckman
Alex Campbell
Alexei Protas
Samuel Bolduc
Drew Helleson
Zach Jones
Elmer Soderblum
Tyler Angle
17 sept. 2021 à 14 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,626
Mentions "j'aime": 9,233
Quoting: TZ11
Seider > Söderström
Byram > Björnfot
Boldy > Krebs, Newhook
Kaliyev > Robertson, Foote, Pinto


Yes
Yes
Definitely not Boldy isn’t a C Newhook out produced him at BC and Krebs is criminally underrated
Maybe - Kaliyev is a straight scorer who vaguely pretends to play defense.
17 sept. 2021 à 15 h 30
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,489
Mentions "j'aime": 3,185
Move either Cozens or Dach to center where they belong and Boldy to wing. Boldy is a winger, not a center.
17 sept. 2021 à 15 h 59
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,489
Mentions "j'aime": 3,185
Modifié 17 sept. 2021 à 16 h 18
Quoting: Xqb15a
Yes
Yes
Definitely not Boldy isn’t a C Newhook out produced him at BC and Krebs is criminally underrated
Maybe - Kaliyev is a straight scorer who vaguely pretends to play defense.


Newhook is better than Krebs, by a fair margin and Boldy is just as good as Newhook. One can debate which is better, but it's close. They're two very different players. But that is why they meshed so well at BC.

Not only were Boldy and Newhook at BC together. They're also best friends, and were roommates as well as linemates. They were inseparable, both on the ice as well as off of it. Newhook started off on Boldy's wing while BC was experimenting with Boldy at center for the the first half of Boldy's freshman year, and even if it didn't work out and the two were ultimately swapped in the positions they played moving forward, Newhook had the benefit of playing that wing position for so long. Even after the switch and Boldy took off offensively after being moved back to his natural wing position, he still played the more defensive role and would often defer production by continuing to utilize Newhook as the primary point producer on that line. That's just how those two worked together and rolled as teammates/friends/players.

So yes, naturally, Newhook out produced Boldy at BC, but that was because of Boldy not because he’s the lesser player.
Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
Voir tout