SalarySwishSalarySwish

allegedly the Sharks went after Kessel at the draft

Créé par: Jupetto
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 14 sept. 2021
Publié: 14 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
SJS
  1. Kessel, Phil (1 000 000 $ retained)
ARI
  1. Barabanov, Alexander
  2. Dahlén, Jonathan
  3. Simek, Radim
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $67 544 530 $0 $507 500 $13 955 470 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

14 sept. 2021 à 22 h 15
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 160
Mentions "j'aime": 37
Literally why. The problem with the team is the aging and declining Dmen @7+ mill a yr
14 sept. 2021 à 22 h 26
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,446
Mentions "j'aime": 18,438
So they were selling Meier at draft, but buying Kessel?
capfriendlyaccount a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2021 à 22 h 37
#3
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: Barzal_Beast
Literally why. The problem with the team is the aging and declining Dmen 7+ mill a yr


Wouldn't be surprised if moving out a Dman was part of the negotiation. Might also be why nothing materialized. Arizona had better offers for less cap on shorter terms.
14 sept. 2021 à 22 h 41
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 160
Mentions "j'aime": 37
Quoting: ricochetii
Wouldn't be surprised if moving out a Dman was part of the negotiation. Might also be why nothing materialized. Arizona had better offers for less cap on shorter terms.


Has to be... though it would take an arm and a leg and a top 5 pick for me to take on a 7X5, 8X4 or 11X6. God doug wilson screwed this team into atleast a 5 yr rebuild.

I don't see why they don't sell everyone left: Couture, lebanc, meier, hertl.

To make matters worse Kane is unmoveable now too.
14 sept. 2021 à 23 h 20
#5
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: Barzal_Beast
Has to be... though it would take an arm and a leg and a top 5 pick for me to take on a 7X5, 8X4 or 11X6. God doug wilson screwed this team into atleast a 5 yr rebuild.

I don't see why they don't sell everyone left: Couture, lebanc, meier, hertl.

To make matters worse Kane is unmoveable now too.


Well, if it were Burns for example, he'd help them keep to the floor (as part of the $20M they took on this off season) with less actual dollars.
I think that would have to be temporary however and would probably mean they retain on his contract and flip him (instead of OEL, which was a silly way to use a retention spot).
It's likely that the 9th overall pick was the deciding factor in them taking cap from Vancouver instead. SJ probably could have topped that if they had offered the Eklund pick (and maybe gotten Kane off their books in the process). Steep price for sure.
Voir tout