SalarySwishSalarySwish

A trade I want us to make

Créé par: FunMustBeAlways
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 11 avr. 2021
Publié: 12 avr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I want the Sharks to trade Donato today. Here's why:

First off I think Donato has actually been pretty solid for us, I don't want to trade him because he's been bad. The problem I have comes in how he fits organizationally and the expansion draft as well.

Donato has been the most valuable on the powerplay, but has been slightly-below average in his play driving and general 5 v. 5 play. I don't think this is an inherently bad thing considering our poor powerplay, but for a team that already struggles a bit to score at even strength, I don't think that's ideal. Donato has been putting up points, but he hasn't been a natural goal scorer which is kind of his claim to fame. I'd rather cash in on him now and see guys like Gregor, Blichfeld, True or Chmelevski get a chance in the future.

In terms of Seattle, as of now, we will have to leave one of Gambrell, Balcers or Donato exposed. People might disagree, but out of the three I'm keeping Gamby and Rudy. If we can limit the number of other good players for the Kraken to take, we might be able to entice them to take Burns (even if it requires compensation). I just think trading him now is better asset management even if they don't take Burns.

Additionally, I think we could get a 2nd out of Donato if we trade him now with retention. He would be a decent add for a team in need of a middle-6 guy to bolster the PP and contribute for less than a million. Long-term I just don't see his upside improving drastically compared to what it is now.

But I dunno, let me know your thoughts.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Reedy, Scott
1842 500 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Holden, Nick
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
VGK
  1. Donato, Ryan (950 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Alright hear me out: Sharks get a late 2nd back for Donato and a small cap dump in Holden. Vegas gets someone who will help their powerplay, which has struggled, and they save 750k as well.

NOTE: This could be anywhere else as well. Bottom line is we're getting a 2nd for Donato if we're trading him. Just thought this trade was a decent fit.

Of course Vegas just traded their 2nd just to spite me.
2.
SJS
  1. Janmark, Mattias (1 125 000 $ retained)
CHI
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
VGK
  1. Janmark, Mattias (562 500 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 744 165 $0 $682 500 $7 755 835 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
723 333 $723 333 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (425 000 $$425K425 000 $$425K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $ (625 000 $$625K625 000 $$625K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (1 175 000 $$1M1 175 000 $$1M)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

12 avr. 2021 à 13 h 38
#1
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,091
Mentions "j'aime": 12,835
Maybe it’s just me and you - but I truly think we need to sell Donato today. I’d rather protect Gambrell and Balcers. So I very much agree a Donato trade would be a blessing in disguise. He’s got value and he’s cheap. I’d rather move forward with a nice depth center and a guy who’s worked.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2021 à 13 h 45
#2
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,016
Mentions "j'aime": 733
I understand and completely agree with your thought process, particularly with regard to Burns.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2021 à 13 h 47
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,229
Mentions "j'aime": 2,875
Quoting: yikes
Maybe it’s just me and you - but I truly think we need to sell Donato today. I’d rather protect Gambrell and Balcers. So I very much agree a Donato trade would be a blessing in disguise. He’s got value and he’s cheap. I’d rather move forward with a nice depth center and a guy who’s worked.


Phew okay I'm glad it isn't just me. Would be really nice to get some value out of Donato while we still can without risking losing him in the ED. We could always trade him in the offseason as well but I think he has more value now.
yikes a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2021 à 13 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,229
Mentions "j'aime": 2,875
Quoting: CheechYou
I understand and completely agree with your thought process, particularly with regard to Burns.


Yeah I feel bad for being so cutthroat and hasty to trade Donato (and Burns too for that matter), but sometimes you gotta do whatcha gotta do :\
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
12 avr. 2021 à 14 h 23
#5
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
We should trade donato. But I have a gut feeling this next 35 minutes something might happen. I’m looking at banker or Hertl.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
Voir tout