SalarySwishSalarySwish

California Burnin

Créé par: Mikker575
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 23 févr. 2021
Publié: 23 févr. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Just end the pain and Doug Wilson´s time, this team is going nowhere in terms of being competitive for a few years.
Transactions
1.
SJS
    Seattle
    ANA
    1. Burns, Brent
    2. Gambrell, Dylan
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
    Détails additionnels:
    Burns doesnt have negative value as many people claim. The lenght of his contract however... thats why I added other pieces
    2.
    SJS
    1. Glass, Cody
    2. Krebs, Peyton
    Détails additionnels:
    One of those two plus pick swap, like 2022 Vegas 3rd for SJS 4th or 5th. But dont really know how Vegas values those 2 so maybe this looks foolish.
    VGK
    1. Hertl, Tomas
    Détails additionnels:
    With retention, I can see him returning top prospect and some middle round picks exchange. SJS prefers center. Move is done this TDL so that he stays on the team next season. Or no retention and SJS takes back cap dump which somehow adjusts the value. In my eyes, Vegas would be a good fit, DeBoer knows Hertl and they might use physical 2C who is good on both ends. Other teams that might be interested are Florida, Boston and Edmonton imo.
    3.
    SJS
    ARI
    1. Dubnyk, Devan
    2. Marleau, Patrick
    3. Nieto, Matt
    4. Noesen, Stefan
    Détails additionnels:
    Some team might need them at TDL for middle to late round picks
    4.
    SJS
    BOS
    1. Vlasic, Marc-Édouard
    Détails additionnels:
    Buyout before 2024 makes not much sense, I guess as vet presence with 15 minutes/game on 3rd pairing during the rebuild time makes more sense than giving up hella lot in a trade
    5.
    SJS
    BOS
    1. Karlsson, Erik
    Détails additionnels:
    With Burns gone and him healthy, he might find himself, but needs someone with great defensive mind next to him. But he is Shark for a long time, I dont see a trade (even a change of scenery) which would make sense. And I dont want to see him on PK ever again.
    6.
    SJS
    BUF
    1. Simek, Radim
    Détails additionnels:
    Feel sorry for this guy and his injury record but I think he might be done soon. Potential buyout or LTIR. If he somehow stays healthy, he can be traded with retention for mid round pick/prospect.
    7.
    SJS
    CGY
    1. Labanc, Kevin
    2. Meier, Timo
    Détails additionnels:
    If Sharks go for hard rebuild, it makes sense to trade these guys. Both can land 1st+ back alone.
    8.
    SJS
    ARI
    1. Sörensen, Marcus
    Détails additionnels:
    Forgot to trade him with Dubnyk and others for likely a late pick
    9.
    SJS
    CAR
    1. Couture, Logan
    2. Jones, Martin
    3. Kane, Evander
    Détails additionnels:
    I dont see these 3 going anywhere, Jones might be bought out later, Couture has very long term and is captain so he will retire Shark imo and Kane would be good physical presence and protection for young kids, but in case of good return, he might be traded as well.
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2081 500 000 $17 437 499 $0 $1 942 500 $64 062 501 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    894 167 $894 167 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    897 500 $897 500 $
    AD
    RFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    859 167 $859 167 $
    C
    RFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    776 667 $776 667 $ (Bonis de performance110 000 $$110K)
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    735 000 $735 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    700 000 $700 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    736 666 $736 666 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    723 333 $723 333 $
    G
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    795 000 $795 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    23 févr. 2021 à 15 h 41
    #1
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 13,291
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
    Burnsie's negative value is *because* of the length of the contract. There are at least 20 teams that are going to be looking to shed a bad contract to Seattle, and they'll be compensated handily for taking the ones that they choose. I don't think Gambrell+3rd even gets Seattle to answer the phone.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    23 févr. 2021 à 15 h 43
    #2
    I want Gourde back
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 4,568
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,376
    Doubt Labanc gets 1st+. He'd get a 1st though
    Klara a aimé ceci.
    23 févr. 2021 à 16 h 4
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2017
    Messages: 164
    Mentions "j'aime": 17
    Quoting: Lenny7
    Burnsie's negative value is *because* of the length of the contract. There are at least 20 teams that are going to be looking to shed a bad contract to Seattle, and they'll be compensated handily for taking the ones that they choose. I don't think Gambrell+3rd even gets Seattle to answer the phone.


    That might be right but in my eyes he still brings value as a player whereas Neal, Lucic or Vlasic have no or negative value as players and their contracts are negative too. Also I doubt Seattle builds team of bottom six players, they will take big names too and SJS fans can hope it will be Burns
    23 févr. 2021 à 16 h 8
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2017
    Messages: 164
    Mentions "j'aime": 17
    Quoting: imawesome
    Doubt Labanc gets 1st+. He'd get a 1st though


    I mean if Goodrow got late 1st, then Labanc can get that too, but i think Meier would go for better pick and worse prospect and Labanc prospect and maybe some 5th/6th rounder, but the overall value might be around late 1st.
    imawesome a aimé ceci.
    23 févr. 2021 à 16 h 8
    #5
    I want Gourde back
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 4,568
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,376
    Quoting: Mikker575
    That might be right but in my eyes he still brings value as a player whereas Neal, Lucic or Vlasic have no or negative value as players and their contracts are negative too. Also I doubt Seattle builds team of bottom six players, they will take big names too and SJS fans can hope it will be Burns


    Is there really a way for a player to have negative value? Unless he's throwing and giving the puck away on purpose I don't think there really is. They made the NHL in the 1st place for a reason
    Voir tout