SalarySwishSalarySwish

Cap dump swap

Créé par: TheChief
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 24 janv. 2021
Publié: 24 janv. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Both players are playing absolutely horrible. They need a rapid change of scenery, so there's something each could savor from these 7 years left of their contracts.
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 471 667 $0 $510 000 $8 028 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
735 000 $735 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

24 janv. 2021 à 2 h 47
#1
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,093
Mentions "j'aime": 12,835
Modifié 24 janv. 2021 à 2 h 53
Definitely not a good trade for the sharks. Doesn’t make any sense.

Makes zero sense for both teams actually (Buffalo doesn’t want the extra cap for the term and the sharks don’t want the worse player ((I mean idk how he’s playing this year so I won’t trash skinner but even still I’d rather Karlsson for the sharks because we have no need for skinner; seeing as a top pair d is more valuable to us than skinner because we need our D men)) and Karlsson is playing very well right now so yes this now makes less sense.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2021 à 3 h 2
#2
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: yikes
Definitely not a good trade for the sharks. Doesn’t make any sense.

Makes zero sense for both teams actually (Buffalo doesn’t want the extra cap for the term and the sharks don’t want the worse player ((I mean idk how he’s playing this year so I won’t trash skinner but even still I’d rather Karlsson for the sharks because we have no need for skinner; seeing as a top pair d is more valuable to us than skinner because we need our D men)) and Karlsson is playing very well right now so yes this now makes less sense.


Imo the trade sucks as well, but I'd like you to tell me how exactly EK is playing very well when he's statistically being one of the worst D-men league wide.
24 janv. 2021 à 3 h 2
#3
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,017
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Karlsson's not playing absolutely horribly. He's just playing like a 6mil dollar version of himself -- not 11.5mil.

Problem is that MEV's playing like a 3mil man, Burns like a 4mil man, Kane like a 5mil, Couture like a 6mil, Timo like a 5mil, Banker like a 3.5mil man, Jones like a 1.5mil, hell even Simek like a 1.5mil man.

Only guy who's truly playing above his contact level is Hertl. Donato Nieto and Sorensen are giving good value at their contracts too and Ferraro and Leonard are very good ELCers (not elite but still very good).
24 janv. 2021 à 3 h 50
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,230
Mentions "j'aime": 2,875
Quoting: justaBoss
Imo the trade sucks as well, but I'd like you to tell me how exactly EK is playing very well when he's statistically being one of the worst D-men league wide.


Karlsson was absolute ass the first 3 games of the season. But he also had played 0 games since mid January in 2020 so there was an adjustment period. Last 2 games he's looked very solid. Still not perfect, but he's due to break out analytically and statistically if he keeps playing like this and doesn't get hurt again. Shades of 2016 EK65. Problem is the coaching staff is playing Karl with Vlasic who basically makes every player around him worse at this point. Especially whoever his D-partner is. Karlsson has looked okay defensively and borderline elite offensively. He's getting better as time goes on.
yikes a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2021 à 10 h 7
#5
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,726
Mentions "j'aime": 31,451
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Karlsson was absolute ass the first 3 games of the season. But he also had played 0 games since mid January in 2020 so there was an adjustment period. Last 2 games he's looked very solid. Still not perfect, but he's due to break out analytically and statistically if he keeps playing like this and doesn't get hurt again. Shades of 2016 EK65. Problem is the coaching staff is playing Karl with Vlasic who basically makes every player around him worse at this point. Especially whoever his D-partner is. Karlsson has looked okay defensively and borderline elite offensively. He's getting better as time goes on.


Hope they buy out Vlasic. Paying him 10 years is costly, but better than using him.
Voir tout