SalarySwishSalarySwish

Keeping the core adding UFAs

Créé par: Old_Flames_Fan
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 29 sept. 2020
Publié: 29 sept. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
So the Markstrom signing is for the value he wants from Van but a year longer to drop the AAV. He also get a MTC is some capacity and its front loaded so he can be moved later at the end of the deal. I think 5m is fair as its right with what Lehner is asking for as they have comparable stats.

Hall is a sign and trade to also drop the AAV, Its an 8x7 deal over 8 year dropping it 1m a year. This is to make the haters happy. I still think he is compatible to Chucky so 7x7 a year is a better correct. value based off production. Chucky is a 0.80 ppg, Johnny is 0.96 and Hall is 0.90 and is older than both. I still feel based off of Hall’s injury history and past production 7m is fair. So i went a year longer to make it hasppen.

Ryan and Dave are cap relief trades. Would be anywhere a deal could be had.

Ceci and Dell are a fill in in’s on show me value deal.

DeMelo would also be any RD that signs in that value.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1853 417 $
22 750 000 $
1871 750 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
11 000 000 $
75 100 000 $
87 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
2.
CGY
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
This would be normally be a third but Calgary gets fouth and the rights to Hall which would also be a sign and Trade. for the 8 years to drop the AAV.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de EDM
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $73 601 833 $0 $457 500 $7 898 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
853 417 $853 417 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
G
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
700 000 $700 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
871 750 $871 750 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

29 sept. 2020 à 20 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,470
Mentions "j'aime": 19,634
Arizona definitely does not need a 4th goalie. I am quite certain Rittich will be a member of the Flames next season
29 sept. 2020 à 20 h 57
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
It was reported that Jacob Markstrom wants 5 x $6,000,000 you're way too low and DeMelo gets around 4 x $3,500,000 not your low ball offer.
29 sept. 2020 à 21 h 57
#3
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,681
Mentions "j'aime": 12,380
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
It was reported that Jacob Markstrom wants 5 x $6,000,000 you're way too low and DeMelo gets around 4 x $3,500,000 not your low ball offer.


Is Markstrom going to get that from the Wings?
29 sept. 2020 à 23 h 10
#4
RifRaf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 106
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Arizona definitely does not need a 4th goalie. I am quite certain Rittich will be a member of the Flames next season


I based the trade off that one or both Raatna and/or Kuemper get traded (didn’t add that in the explanation). Arizona gets a cheaper goalie option as I thought they are rumoured to have a low internal cap set. Dave solves this issue.

Also I put they would go where a deal could be had so I wasn't;t locking in Arizona.
29 sept. 2020 à 23 h 21
#5
RifRaf
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 106
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
It was reported that Jacob Markstrom wants 5 x $6,000,000 you're way too low and DeMelo gets around 4 x $3,500,000 not your low ball offer.


Did you read the part where DeMelo was added just to fill the roster and that if not him any RHD in that price range? Did you also miss the part where I gave Markstrom an extra year to bring down the AAV? That actually works out to 6x7 not the 6x6.

Sorry for being unclear. Actually I wasn’t. Obviously you didn’t read the team explanation or you wouldn't have made such foolish comments. You need to pay more attention.
Voir tout