SalarySwishSalarySwish

Defense is a huge question mark for this team

Créé par: Kyle_Davidson
Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 5 juin 2020
Publié: 5 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Preparing next years team is difficult because we have so many defenseman that are veteran and therefore deserve time, but also have a ton of prospects looking in. Feel free to comment on how you might solve this problem as a Chicago fan.

This post assumes no CBO, a steady cap, and a shortened season (January-April)
First cuts - Nicolas Beaudin

I really like this guys game, and I think he could potentially be a good top 4 option in the future. He had a really solid start to his NHL career the last game of the season vs the sharks, and I hope that gives him confidence moving forward in his development. He is the first cut because he is the easiest to cut, barring some insane development/ training camp. I think this is the right move for his development as well considering he had a tough first year at pro hockey with the ice hogs. Now that he has more experience he can hone his game in the AHL and get a call up, and permanent spot the year after the expansion draft.

2nd cut
Dennis Gilbert
I like Gilbert’s fighting spirit, he fights a lot ha ha that’s the joke, but otherwise I’m not sure he has much more upside than a bottom pair defenseman. Considering we have plenty of those currently, combined with his waiver exemption status, I see him being an injury call up and not much else for this year. Because he is young, he is an easy cut, again barring an incredible training camp.

3rd Cut
Nick Seeler
This one is not really a cut per se, but I would guess the Blackhawks would put Seeler on waivers before sending someone like Lucas Carlson down, and with good reason. Seeler served his purpose, but I think Carlson has proven himself a more capable defensman at this point. I am only wondering if the Blackhawks are okay with Carlsson being the 7th D-man.
4th and final cut
Ian Mitchell
I know I’m going to get my you know what handed to me for saying this, but I don’t envision (at least not with what we know now) Seabrook not being ready for next season. Unless someone us traded from our defense , and that looks unlikely considering the state of the cap, our three right handed shots are Murphy, Boqvist and Seabrook. People have said to move Murphy to his off side, but then who does he push out? Keith is going to be our top pair LHD again this year, and I can’t see De Hann not being right behind him. At this point I’m thinking Maatta and Carlson will be fighting for games, and you probably want to use Murphy higher than the third pairing anyways. The Blackhawks May want him to spend a year in Rockford, or might have to stash him there if they don’t get this figured out. Boqvist is Boqvist and he is making the NHL for obvious reasons. I also think it should be self explanatory that Seabrook is playing bottom pair.

Overall I think my thoughts are probably scatterbrained, but I’m thinking the real Bowman is going to have his work cut our for him this offseason. (This post does not even tackle forwards)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 250 000 $
34 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
MIN
  1. Seeler, Nick
Détails additionnels:
Waiver
2.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $72 328 597 $1 090 244 $4 282 500 $9 171 403 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 366 666 $3 366 666 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

5 juin 2020 à 8 h 14
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,683
Mentions "j'aime": 9,834
My first thought is where's Slater Koekkoek? I agree with what you you said. Additionally, it's tough to trade away a veteran like Maatta because DeHann and Seabs are coming off major surgeries. I think Carlsson will start in Rockford. Slater will be paired with Maata on the bottom pair and unfortunately Seabs will be the 7th Dman swapped in and out with Koekkoek.
Wadejos123 et ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2020 à 8 h 30
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,297
Mentions "j'aime": 4,946
Koekkoek deserves to play the bottom pair with maata after the season he had last year, but I can't see Seabs in the press box for the majority of the season so he probably stays on the bottom pair. As much as us fans like carlson, it seemed to me that colliton didn't. When he played he was really good, but would still be scratched the next game anyways. Matta/koekkoek fight for the bottom pair spot all year and carlson spends the year in Rockford (possibly paired with Mitchell). I want to see Mitchell make this team, but it probably won't happen for the reasons you mentioned
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2020 à 8 h 46
#3
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,683
Mentions "j'aime": 9,834
Quoting: Wadejos123
Koekkoek deserves to play the bottom pair with maata after the season he had last year, but I can't see Seabs in the press box for the majority of the season so he probably stays on the bottom pair. As much as us fans like carlson, it seemed to me that colliton didn't. When he played he was really good, but would still be scratched the next game anyways. Matta/koekkoek fight for the bottom pair spot all year and carlson spends the year in Rockford (possibly paired with Mitchell). I want to see Mitchell make this team, but it probably won't happen for the reasons you mentioned


So I hear you on Carlsson should get more NHL ice time. Would it be the worst thing for his development...and chemistry to spend the beginning of the season in Rockford (since he can still be sent down without being waived) paired with Ian Mitchell?
5 juin 2020 à 8 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,297
Mentions "j'aime": 4,946
Quoting: exo2769
So I hear you on Carlsson should get more NHL ice time. Would it be the worst thing for his development...and chemistry to spend the beginning of the season in Rockford (since he can still be sent down without being waived) paired with Ian Mitchell?


Carlson should get icetime, but won't play over koekkoek or maata
5 juin 2020 à 9 h 11
#5
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
I agree with a lot of this, which sucks because I don’t think a Seabrook is an NHL option at this point, but that’s the nature of the game unfortunately. I like Smith for Baerstchi, could be a shrewd pickup if he clicks with someone. I know I’m a Koekkoek fanboy, but at the very least trade his rights for something reasonable. I think if we are stuck with Seabrook there is a chance we have to him go, which isn’t ideal but help is on the way.

Looking at this team as it’s constructed, who do you see Seattle taking?
Voir tout