SalarySwishSalarySwish

Habs 2020-21

Créé par: CaptainFlynnt
Équipe: 2020-21 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 16 févr. 2020
Publié: 16 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Trade #1:
- Dallas adds an offensive player to boost their offense, they are already a good team defensively. MTL adds a 1st round pick for their big draft this year and Robertson, who could potentially replace Tatar in the lineup one day.

Trade #2:
- The habs are done this year, so they move Kovalchuk for a 2nd round pick and give him a chance to play for the cup. Habs also add the rights to Allan McShane (no room for the center prospect in Laval next year).

Trade #3:
- MTL uses their cap space to acquire another 1st round pick (although it will be a very late one). Boston gains $6M in cap space this season and the next by moving Backes contract, while also adding a Nick Cousins for some depth at forward.

Trade #4:
- McNiven has been badly mishandled in the MTL organization. The team does the right thing by sending the former CHL goalie of the year to his hometown where he will get some playing time.

Notable Free Agent signings:
- Kovalchuk, having enjoyed his time in MTL, comes back on a one year deal worth $3M. He can play anywhere in MTL's top 9 and either wing which gives MTL some good depth and versatility.
- Romanov joins the team and hopefully improves MTL's back end. He can play on any pair, but I would like to see him paired with a good skating defenseman like Petry since Romanov seems to be the one starting the rush with good breakout passes.
- Bergevin pays up to finally give Price a reliable backup. At 35 or 36, Crawford is past his prime, but the habs should be able to count on the MTL native.

I also added Lafreniere to the lineup because that would he amazing.

Laval Rocket Lines:
Hudon - Kotkaniemi - Ikonen*
Robertson - Poehling - Belzile
Vejdemo - Hillis - Barber
Teasdale* - Dauphin - Alain
Harvey-Pinard / Fonstad

Ouellet - Fluery
Alzner - Juulsen*
Olofsson - Brook
Leskinen

Primeau
Lindgren

3 1st round picks, 3 2nd picks, and 8 more picks through rounds 3 to 7. The draft in Montreal could be a huge turning point for the organization.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
3750 000 $
3875 000 $
3900 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
35 000 000 $
2800 000 $
1700 000 $
1900 000 $
1700 000 $
22 500 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
1825 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
22 000 000 $
1750 000 $
14 000 000 $
13 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Lafreniere, Alexis
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Robertson, Jason
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
2.
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
EDM
  1. McShane, Allan [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
F Ilya Kovalchuk
3.
MTL
  1. Backes, David
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Cousins, Nick [Droits de RFA]
4.
MTL
    Future Considerations
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de CHI
    2021
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de MTL
    2022
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 000 000 $77 478 809 $0 $425 000 $5 521 191 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Lafreniere, Alexis
    925 000 $925 000 $
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    800 000 $800 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Bruins de Boston
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    C, AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2

    Unités spéciales

    Avantage numérique 1
    Lafreniere, A.
    Avantage numérique 2
    Infériorité numérique 1
    Infériorité numérique 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    16 févr. 2020 à 22 h 3
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 19,638
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
    My goodness, based on the prices for players with term, MB should be fired if he's not thinking of moving Tatar AND Petry this year.
    16 févr. 2020 à 22 h 13
    #2
    Habs
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 2,224
    Mentions "j'aime": 384
    Quoting: F50marco
    My goodness, based on the prices for players with term, MB should be fired if he's not thinking of moving Tatar AND Petry this year.


    I would definitely be trying to move Tatar, he seems more easily replaceable. If the habs move Petry they have no chance next year, so I'd probably wait and see with Petry, can always move him at the deadline next year if the habs are out of the playoffs again.
    16 févr. 2020 à 22 h 26
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 19,638
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
    Quoting: CaptainFlynnt
    I would definitely be trying to move Tatar, he seems more easily replaceable. If the habs move Petry they have no chance next year, so I'd probably wait and see with Petry, can always move him at the deadline next year if the habs are out of the playoffs again.


    Based on what we know, how confident are you the Habs can make the playoffs next year? (Excluding the Habs getting lucky with Laf this year haha)

    IMHO, enough is enough. Either its injuries that get us or its Price not playing well or its our top scorers not going or its EXCUSE AFTER EXCUSE AFTER EXCUSE.....How about the most obvious explanation? The team is simply not good enough? If that is the case how do we get the high end good players? Through the draft. How do you get the high end draft picks? By trading your good assets!

    Petry will be 33 by this time next year...... he's having a career year. Habs are not winning the cup next year either and resigning Petry when he is 35 is the dumbet thing I can think of. NOW is the best time to move an asset like that who you used wisely these past years and only paid a 2nd and a 5th for in the first place.

    I'm so sick of mediocrity @Captainflynnt, I'm so tired of seeing guys like Kovalchuk be talked about as our savior for next year......... Can't we just be lucky that we took a chance on a guy for free and turned him into a free asset? Why do we have to go another step and resign the 37 year old... Like he's the missing piece that will get us in the playoffs.... This team is simply not good enough.

    What are we afraid of exactly with trading Petry this year? That the Habs will suck next year because they don't have someone to replace him? NEWSFLASH: The Habs have been sucky regardless. Whats another few spots worse? Especially when we could get a massive haul for Petry now?.

    Ok /endrant. laugh
    16 févr. 2020 à 22 h 36
    #4
    Habs
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2016
    Messages: 2,224
    Mentions "j'aime": 384
    Modifié 16 févr. 2020 à 22 h 52
    Quoting: F50marco
    Based on what we know, how confident are you the Habs can make the playoffs next year? (Excluding the Habs getting lucky with Laf this year haha)

    IMHO, enough is enough. Either its injuries that get us or its Price not playing well or its our top scorers not going or its EXCUSE AFTER EXCUSE AFTER EXCUSE.....How about the most obvious explanation? The team is simply not good enough? If that is the case how do we get the high end good players? Through the draft. How do you get the high end draft picks? By trading your good assets!

    Petry will be 33 by this time next year...... he's having a career year. Habs are not winning the cup next year either and resigning Petry when he is 35 is the dumbet thing I can think of. NOW is the best time to move an asset like that who you used wisely these past years and only paid a 2nd and a 5th for in the first place.

    I'm so sick of mediocrity @Captainflynnt, I'm so tired of seeing guys like Kovalchuk be talked about as our savior for next year......... Can't we just be lucky that we took a chance on a guy for free and turned him into a free asset? Why do we have to go another step and resign the 37 year old... Like he's the missing piece that will get us in the playoffs.... This team is simply not good enough.

    What are we afraid of exactly with trading Petry this year? That the Habs will suck next year because they don't have someone to replace him? NEWSFLASH: The Habs have been sucky regardless. Whats another few spots worse? Especially when we could get a massive haul for Petry now?.

    Ok /endrant. laugh


    If the habs trade Petry, then you have to tear it down... I doubt Weber and Price will be sticking around if the habs aren't trying to make the playoffs. If they go, what about Gallagher and Armia the next year when they are UFA's? All of a sudden this becomes a long rebuild, I don't think anyone wants that (no playoffs 3 years in a row is already enough).

    I think MTL needs to be careful when they decide which players they plan on selling. I don't see any downside to keeping Petry for next season.

    If they trade Petry they would have to be getting a potential replacement top 4 RHD that could be ready next year. Like the Jets did with Trouba for Poink.

    Edit:
    They will turn Kovalchuk into an asset. Should have kept him on the 1st line with Danault, his trade value has been dropping since they were broken up. Kovalchuk's size and creativity was a good compliment to the Danault line. I actually think they were more effective when Gallagher was hurt, Danault specifically seemed to be playing his best hockey of the season, he and Kovalchuk had instant chemistry.

    Edit ×2:
    To be specific, Kovalchuk had 8 pts in 8 games while gallagher was out of the lineup. With gallagher in the lineup, Kovalchuk has 4 pts in 10 games. Gallagher had 5 pts in the 10 games he played on the top line over Kovalchuk.

    In summary, Kovy had 8 pts in 8 games when playing with Danault, vs. Kovy and Gallagher combining for only 9 pts in 20 games after screwing up that line.
    16 févr. 2020 à 23 h 5
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 19,638
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,770
    Quoting: CaptainFlynnt
    If the habs trade Petry, then you have to tear it down... I doubt Weber and Price will be sticking around if the habs aren't trying to make the playoffs. If they go, what about Gallagher and Armia the next year when they are UFA's? All of a sudden this becomes a long rebuild, I don't think anyone wants that (no playoffs 3 years in a row is already enough).

    I think MTL needs to be careful when they decide which players they plan on selling. I don't see any downside to keeping Petry for next season.

    If they trade Petry they would have to be getting a potential replacement top 4 RHD that could be ready next year. Like the Jets did with Trouba for Poink.

    Edit:
    They will turn Kovalchuk into an asset. Should have kept him on the 1st line with Danault, his trade value has been dropping since they were broken up. Kovalchuk's size and creativity was a good compliment to the Danault line. I actually think they were more effective when Gallagher was hurt, Danault specifically seemed to be playing his best hockey of the season, he and Kovalchuk had instant chemistry.

    Edit ×2:
    To be specific, Kovalchuk had 8 pts in 8 games while gallagher was out of the lineup. With gallagher in the lineup, Kovalchuk has 4 pts in 10 games. Gallagher had 5 pts in the 10 games he played on the top line over Kovalchuk.

    In summary, Kovy had 8 pts in 8 games when playing with Danault, vs. Kovy and Gallagher combining for only 9 pts in 20 games after screwing up that line.


    Then it can't be any more clear: this team needs to tear it down. If you aren't a team capable of winning with these players in your lineup, then this idea that is being spun that "this will be the year!" is half hearted. You can't have your cake and eat it too as they say. You can't both be a team that isn't proving it can make the playoffs AND a team that is constantly going for the playoffs. At a certain point, gotta look in the mirror.

    MTL needs to stop worrying about what Price and Weber, etc think. They aren't a cup contender with them in the lineup anyway and the contracts they have are virtually untradeable. They signed their own destiny. If they don't like it, they can null their contracts. Armia, Gallagher, etc who cares? Trade them! We're so afraid to lose our players that we forget that we GET GOOD PLAYERS IN RETURN also! I'm not sure guys like Price and Weber and Gallagher are any more happy with the current situation that this hypothetical one anyhow. Either scenario, the Habs aren't making the playoffs. Except one scenario is accepting of it and the other is being hard headed about it.

    I'm ok with that Petry trade scenario however (Trouba comparison). Trading Both Tatar and Petry doesn't have to be JUST picks and prospects. It can be young players who are capable of playing right now too a la Pionk. If the mandate is to make it look like were still trying to win next year, than by all means add players that can help immediately also. Would be nice if the Habs could use some of that free agent money to fill that void instead though from the start....

    Management is trying to fit a round peg in a square hole. "Hey maybe this year will be the year!". No its isn't and the more you try to convince people of it, the more time is wasted rebuilding the team the correct way...
    CD282 a aimé ceci.
    Voir tout