SalarySwishSalarySwish

TDL moves

Créé par: exo2769
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 10 févr. 2020
Publié: 10 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
TDL moves now that the Hawk are basically out of it. Good teams find ways to win games. Bad teams find ways to lose games. Yell at the refs all you want Hawks fans. We're losing games. Not winning them.

CGY's schedule until the TDL. SJS, LAK, ANA, CHI, ANA, BOS DET. YUP, 1 game against a playoff team.

WPG's schedule NYR, SJS, CHI, LAK, OTT, PHI, BUF. YUP, another team with 1 game against a playoff team.

If you're thinking...what's the Blackhawks schedule. Let's put it this way. Every single team they face has more points than they do right now.
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
CAR
  1. Gustafsson, Erik
  2. Lehner, Robin (2 500 000 $ retained)
2.
CHI
  1. Lundmark, Simon [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
3.
CHI
  1. Mutala, Sasha [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (COL)
COL
  1. Crawford, Corey (3 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Smith, Zack
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CAR
Logo de BUF
Logo de WPG
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de COL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $47 038 461 $0 $7 877 500 $34 461 539 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

10 févr. 2020 à 8 h 19
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,558
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Carolina reject. In a heartbeat. This isn't an upgrade worth it

Winnipeg probably listen.... I don't know if they take it because I don't know much about the prospect, but they'll listen

Colorado can go after better players than Crawford and Smith, this isn't worth it for them. Especially because Francouz has been insanely good
10 févr. 2020 à 8 h 25
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,692
Mentions "j'aime": 9,842
Quoting: Caniac2000
Carolina reject. In a heartbeat. This isn't an upgrade worth it

Winnipeg probably listen.... I don't know if they take it because I don't know much about the prospect, but they'll listen

Colorado can go after better players than Crawford and Smith, this isn't worth it for them. Especially because Francouz has been insanely good


We just very much disagree about what CAR needs. Even Reimer's letting up 5 spots. I coulda called that...in fact have for half a year now.

COL has tons of cap space and a pretty bad PK. Smith can really help there and Crow's playoff experience is helpful.
10 févr. 2020 à 8 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,558
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Quoting: exo2769
We just very much disagree about what CAR needs. Even Reimer's letting up 5 spots. I coulda called that...in fact have for half a year now.

COL has tons of cap space and a pretty bad PK. Smith can really help there and Crow's playoff experience is helpful.


Reimer let in 5 and still had a .900+ save percentage. Fact is, it's not on him. Goaltending is NOT a need for Carolina

Colorado need scoring outside of MacK, Landy, and Rants. Someone like Pageau is a far better fit, plus it's not in division
Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
10 févr. 2020 à 8 h 54
#4
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,650
Mentions "j'aime": 1,676
I happen to agree COL is happy with Grub and Franz in net. I don’t think they want Crawford. Maybe Saad? Or Saad + Nylander for really good prospect not named Byram or Newhook and a 1st?
10 févr. 2020 à 8 h 59
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,569
Mentions "j'aime": 19,702
I see you have also looked at the upcoming schedules, however Nashville's and Arizona's should also be considered. Personally I think Chicago should be sellers this year though. They have some young core of players coming up and realistically should get a good draft position this year.

As for the Carolina trade. I see them certainly interested in 1 of your 2 goalies but not without 1 of theirs going back. Gus could make sense as a stopgap but They wont overpay for a pure rental. Canes have a lot of LD prospects that Chicago could be interested in
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
Voir tout