SalarySwishSalarySwish

TDL Selling

Créé par: exo2769
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 2 janv. 2020
Publié: 6 janv. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Manning, Brandon
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
2.
CHI
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
CAR
  1. Lehner, Robin (2 500 000 $ retained)
3.
4.
CHI
PIT
  1. Ceci, Cody (2 250 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $62 565 853 $0 $7 877 500 $18 934 147 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner

Commentaires populaires

6 janv. 2020 à 9 h 18
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
I will just quote myself from some other thread abot TML trade ( to lazy to rewrite ) :

Quoting: Laudan
No need to explain me about it, im not a homer yelling Hutchinson is back on track after two Games against DET and how we are fine.....

For sure it is a record there, but 35 year old rental for 6M ( or even half retained by some cheap "magic" ) and 3,11 GAA on the Team with better D then TML has surely isnt the answer....especially not for those 20 Games he should be fielded. His 3.11 would translate into 3.8 with current superior TML defence or actually he would be hospitalized after Game with WPG few days ago......

Sry to say it but Crawford is done.....would pay you two 1sts five years back for him, but bringing him in today ? No thx.....
6 janv. 2020 à 9 h 20
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,684
Mentions "j'aime": 9,837
Quoting: Laudan
I will just quote myself from some other thread abot TML trade ( to lazy to rewrite ) :


So, who's the solution for the backup? Hutch ain't it. Why not a 3rd round pick for a real backup. Anderson's played in 33 games so far. You want that to be 60 before the playoffs? I'm not a Leafs fan, but as a neutral observer on the outside...getting a back up goalie is probably more important than overpaying for a quality RHD. You can help the team more, for soo much less. No?
6 janv. 2020 à 9 h 24
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: exo2769
So, who's the solution for the backup? Hutch ain't it. Why not a 3rd round pick for a real backup. Anderson's played in 33 games so far. You want that to be 60 before the playoffs? I'm not a Leafs fan, but as a neutral observer on the outside...getting a back up goalie is probably more important than overpaying for a quality RHD. You can help the team more, for soo much less. No?


Hutch hasn't been bad recently. And he doesn't need to be a 1B, he just needs to be exactly like he's been under Keefe. He needs to give the team a chance to win and to help Andersen get some days off. With how the team has been playing, there isn't as much panic around that spot as there was before. TO just goes out and win. Right now, there isn't much need to do anything apart from continue to evaluate while the team continues to adjust to Keefe's system. That is the thing that most people on here fail to think about. They are only 20 games into learning this system, they will definitely continue to tighten things up.
6 janv. 2020 à 9 h 28
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,490
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Modifié 6 janv. 2020 à 9 h 42
Quoting: exo2769
So, who's the solution for the backup? Hutch ain't it. Why not a 3rd round pick for a real backup. Anderson's played in 33 games so far. You want that to be 60 before the playoffs? I'm not a Leafs fan, but as a neutral observer on the outside...getting a back up goalie is probably more important than overpaying for a quality RHD. You can help the team more, for soo much less. No?


Homers will come with : Hutchinson is good on basis of three Games pattern ( or 5 last year ) but as i said, to much money for what Crawford can do at the moment. I agree with you completelly TML needs backup ( tho not more then two defenders that will play D beside Muzzin, which will allow Backup to be even a mediocre guy cause SA and SCA would be adressed by that ) but Crawford isnt it. My targets usually are DeSmith as odd man out Goalie that can be replaced by Hutchinson in AHL or Cambell with LA falling of the cliff this year....
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2020 à 9 h 29
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,684
Mentions "j'aime": 9,837
Modifié 6 janv. 2020 à 9 h 36
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Hutch hasn't been bad recently. And he doesn't need to be a 1B, he just needs to be exactly like he's been under Keefe. He needs to give the team a chance to win and to help Andersen get some days off. With how the team has been playing, there isn't as much panic around that spot as there was before. TO just goes out and win. Right now, there isn't much need to do anything apart from continue to evaluate while the team continues to adjust to Keefe's system. That is the thing that most people on here fail to think about. They are only 20 games into learning this system, they will definitely continue to tighten things up.


I have zero issues with waiting to see how things go. That would be my plan as of 1/6/2020 if I were Dubas. Hutch I think 4 games under Keefe? My discussion point is more so...75% of the games are going to Anderson. That's too much. He's going to be worn out by the playoffs. Maybe it isn't Crow, but Hutch needs to be playing more games. If anything the rate of Anderson playing has increased since Keefe took over. I'm just thinking that a 3rd rounder for a 2 time cup winner and let's be honest, more inspired netminder when you have something to play for...would be a good addition to help keep this high for TOR going even longer. Just me.

***EDIT*** regarding the 20 games. That goes both ways. Other teams haven't had a chance to game plan against Keefe either. That's probably more a negative than you're thinking. It's actually possible this might be why TOR is on a tear recently. Just food for thought, that's all.
Voir tout