SalarySwishSalarySwish

Trading 8 OV to minny

Créé par: EthanBearForVezina
Équipe: 2018-19 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 9 avr. 2019
Publié: 9 avr. 2019
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Légende
Gaucher
Équipe initiale
Exempté du ballottage
Droitier
Position
Clause d'échange
Max. Bonis de perf.
Statut à l’échéance du contrat
Terme restant
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
Exempté du ballottageMcDavid, Connor
12 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Trading 8 OV to Minnesota 2 possibilities
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2019 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
Zucker.
MIN
    2019 1st rounder
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2019
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2020
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2021
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2279 500 000 $74 875 749 $0 $2 500 000 $4 624 251 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    650 000 $650 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 835 000 $2 835 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    675 000 $675 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    675 000 $675 000 $
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    761 250 $761 250 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    700 000 $700 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner

    Commentaires populaires

    9 avr. 2019 à 22 h 4
    #1
    Just Keep Swimming
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 9,341
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,673
    I'm not sure moving up 4 picks in a deep draft within the top 15 and Debrincat 2.0 lurking around the teens-2nd round (if gms make the same mistake twice) is worth taking on that Lucic contract... like at all.

    Read again and realized they were two options... still not convinced it would be worth it considering how MIN is already leveraged up their ass in long expensive contracts.
    9 avr. 2019 à 22 h 6
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 5,062
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,008
    Neither an answer???

    Not really a good answer to how to get rid of Lucic other than build a time machine...
    9 avr. 2019 à 22 h 8
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2017
    Messages: 8,697
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
    Quoting: Random2152
    I'm not sure moving up 4 picks in a deep draft within the top 15 and Debrincat 2.0 lurking around the teens-2nd round (if gms make the same mistake twice) is worth taking on that Lucic contract... like at all.

    Read again and realized they were two options... still not convinced it would be worth it considering how MIN is already leveraged up their ass in long expensive contracts.


    Eh, we have well over $10M to play with so we could do it, but yeah I'd rather not take on Lucic. Fact is the Wild HAVE to hit on a prospect this year so if there's someone available at 8 that we like (such as a Turcotte/Dach or even a Cozens/Zegras) then I'd do the Zucker + our 1st for the 8th overall pick.
    9 avr. 2019 à 22 h 12
    #4
    Just Keep Swimming
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 9,341
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,673
    Quoting: TanSor
    Eh, we have well over $10M to play with so we could do it, but yeah I'd rather not take on Lucic. Fact is the Wild HAVE to hit on a prospect this year so if there's someone available at 8 that we like (such as a Turcotte/Dach or even a Cozens/Zegras) then I'd do the Zucker + our 1st for the 8th overall pick.


    I will agree that the 2nd trade option is certainly worth considering, was more focused on the Lucic part of the deal for my original comment.
    TanSor a aimé ceci.
    9 avr. 2019 à 22 h 37
    #5
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 40,664
    Mentions "j'aime": 25,496
    Quoting: TanSor
    Eh, we have well over $10M to play with so we could do it, but yeah I'd rather not take on Lucic. Fact is the Wild HAVE to hit on a prospect this year so if there's someone available at 8 that we like (such as a Turcotte/Dach or even a Cozens/Zegras) then I'd do the Zucker + our 1st for the 8th overall pick.


    Oh, I think that's the wrong choice. 8th overall to take a center and 12th overall to take a pretty highly rated defenseman ( at least three of Broberg, Soderstrom, Robertson and York should all be available and Harley may drop to 12) is certainly worth the burden of buying Lucic out.
    Voir tout