SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

pilger1989

Membre depuis
23 mai 2016
Équipe favorite
Canadiens de Montréal
Messages dans les forums
57
Messages par jour
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GM10 mars 2018 à 20 h 8
Sujet: MTL 18-19
Forum: Armchair-GM10 mars 2018 à 14 h 57
Sujet: MTL 18-19
Forum: Armchair-GM10 mars 2018 à 14 h 55
Sujet: MTL 18-19
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>willinbulgaria</b></div><div>So 1 40pt season (he's not gonna get 40 this year) warrants a 4x + salary hike?
Yeah, you can argue if he wasn't injured he would've gotten 40 pts again - but coulda, shoulda , didn't is what it comes down to.
I really believe that Danault over achieved last year by playing with Radulov - had it not been for that - and the need to thrust him into the #1C position, his numbers wouldn't have come close.
He's also not been able to elevate Patches game playing most the year with him when Patches was able to score 30+ goals consistently with the likes of Desharnais and Plekanec.

And just to give you a point of reference, Plekanec (which is who I equate Danualt to, but Danault has less skill) only received a 2.75M 1 year contract after scoring 3 consecutive 20+ goal seasons. After Pleks first FULL year with the Habs, in which he scored 20 goals and 47 pts he only received a 1.6M/year contract (2 years).

Sorry, but I just don't see the reasoning for awarding Danault the kind of money that's being suggested here - and I don't see him sticking long term on this team (maybe as a 3rd, eventually a 4th line center) - if we ask (and pay) Danault for more than that (2C or 1C), then we're just running into the same course we did the last twenty years with Pleks, Desharnais and Koivu - who were all great as #2 and #3 centers, but definitely were not #1C.</div></div>

Eller got 3x3.5 with less production. Also, Danault has leverage due to Montreal's lack of centre depth.