SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

lukefromstreets

Membre depuis
29 juill. 2021
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Messages dans les forums
22
Messages par jour
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GM9 avr. 2023 à 14 h 29
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hawksguy81</b></div><div>Hawks decline both of those trades. They are nowhere near the point where they are going to trade away 2nd round picks for a couple of one year rentals. And I doubt Hall waives for Chicago anyway.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>JK74</b></div><div>With all due respect, why in the world would a rebuilding team trade draft capital for veteran players? The point is to accumulate prospects in hopes of building from within. And before you say they can be flipped at next season's deadline, let me remind you this is potentially the deepest draft we'll see in a while.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>palhal</b></div><div>Not any respect for players M NTC.s.... Hall looks like he isn't worth his contract so why are teams paying for him. And you can be sure both Ullmark and Hall would only have teams that have no cap on their trade list.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Aussie_Blackhawk</b></div><div>Will give you TBL 2nd for Grzelcyk if you add Lysell.

Hall deal is a non-starter due to the NTC and the fact we are rebuilding and the draft capital is far greater value then the proposed rental.</div></div>

Hall trade is just an idea, but if it can't get done its no biggie. Keep him and don't sign Bertuzzi, money's basically a wash.

I doubt he actually has a full NMC btw.

As for Chicago, they suck ass, have a **** ton of cap room, and not enough good players. Who says any deal would be a "rental?" They could ya know, sign them to contracts.
Forum: Armchair-GM4 mars 2023 à 1 h 22