PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
doofmsad
Oilersfan123
Membre depuis
8 déc. 2017
Équipe favorite
Oilers d'Edmonton
Messages dans les forums
213
Messages par jour
0.1
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. 2019 à 6 h 39
Sujet:
RNH trade - Feedback
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FullSend</b></div><div>We’ve kinda established as a team that Spooner is not a sufficient 3rd line C, don’t know why you got him there.</div></div>
Yeah, forgot to send him down. Marody is the 3C.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. 2019 à 3 h 11
Sujet:
can it be done
No, it definitely cannot be done. Why would we trade a 25 year old top-pairing defensemen for a rental?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. 2019 à 2 h 24
Sujet:
Youthful blueline freeing up salary
Stars laugh and hang up.
Leafs fans overrate their players so badly.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 févr. 2019 à 0 h 50
Sujet:
Breakfast
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Boatface</b></div><div>The Van trade is actually sick
Working 3rd or possibly 2nd line Center in Sutter also improves penalty kill.
Kole Lind is a good prospect with soft hands and speed.
Kapanen is the same with grit but less hands.
A lot of talk about getting speed next to Mcdouble so this fixes that with spending any $ for a bit at least.
I always find it interesting how Edmonton fans eviscerate any trade proposals while demanding change.
I wouldn't want to trade Darnnel but at the end of the day I just picked up a future 25-30 goals in the form of sandpaper.</div></div>
We don't eviscerate every trade proposal. Just the ones that make are team worse.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 févr. 2019 à 4 h 48
Sujet:
Iced Oil
The Drai trade is atrocious.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 févr. 2019 à 2 h 46
Sujet:
Breakfast
Hell no to Ottawa, Toronto, and the Vancouver trade.
Pulju + Yammy + Khaira >>>>>>>>> Juolevi + Cap dumps
Ryan >= Lucic
Duchene <<<< Nuge
Nurse >>>> Kapanen
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 févr. 2019 à 6 h 55
Sujet:
Offersheet
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OshietheBeast</b></div><div>Giving prospects for a bottom pair dman in Severson. Chiarelli is that you??!!</div></div>
A bottom pairing defensemen averaging nearly 22 minutes a night on pace for 40 points? Oh yeah, and he's 24, playing on the second pp unit.
I would gladly pay Bear, Pulju, and a 2nd for him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 févr. 2019 à 3 h 28
Sujet:
Stone - Read description
Seems like a lot to give up for a rental, unless you are quite sure he will resign.
Other than that, doesn't seem too bad.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 févr. 2019 à 2 h 56
Sujet:
Offersheet
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>McFaksaGOAT</b></div><div>I think it has to be on a 5 year deal if I’m not mistaken</div></div>
Maybe. That would work too. I'll change it.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
5 févr. 2019 à 2 h 40
Sujet:
Offersheet
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Jamiepo</b></div><div>Compensation is a first and a third, for that Toronto may not match.</div></div>
No. Under 4,059,322 is a 2nd round pick.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
29 janv. 2019 à 4 h 47
Sujet:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeterChiarelli</b></div><div>While statistics show that alternating handedness for a powerplay does tend to lead to a more successful powerplay, it isn't gospel. Edmonton ran 5 left shots for a bit when they had right-handed options. Their powerplay isn't much better with Puljujarvi on it than it was off it.
Regardless, drafting for handedness or position instead of taking the best player available is a mistake 9 times out of 10. Relying on an 18 year old to be your #1RW or be the target shooter for your #1PP is equally as much of a mistake. If you're at #3, you take the guy ranked at #3 unless you have a damn good reason not to (like knowing he's a bum etc).
If you're going to make the comparison between Kravtsov and Podkolzin - which is fair - then consider all aspects of the two players, not just the scoring. The KHL and its affiliate leagues are incredibly political and quite often player stats end up skewed because of which. Kravtsov is a year and a half older than Podkolzin, which gave him both a size and strength advantage in his pre-draft year and his draft year. Podkolzin, due to who his KHL draft rights belonged to, was kept on the national program for additional playing time. Kravtsov also had the advantage of not trying to earn icetime on the stacked SKA St. Petersburgh team; Podkolzin has to compete with a myriad of former NHLers on the squad that's been hand-picked by the Russian government to perennially contend for the Gagarin Cup. While I'm not discounting what Kravtsov did as an 18 year-old in the KHL last year or what he's continue to do this year, I think more attention needs to be put on Podkolzin being 18 months younger than Kravtsov and has played KHL games as a 17 year old. It's incredibly rare for the KHL to play 18 year-olds, nevermind someone even younger. Other things to consider regarding these two players? They both played in the WJC's as 18 year-olds, but only Podkolzin put up points in the tournament. Podkolzin has represented Russia in more international events, and has shown to be more suited to playing on the smaller ice. Podkolzin has a higher ppg average at every level of international play (except the U20s, which he'll be eligible for the next two and will bring that total well beyond Kravtsov's).
Also, do note that this year's draft class is weaker than last year's: Kravtsov going 9th last year means nothing to where Podkolzin goes this year. If Kravtsov were eligible for this year's draft with the numbers he had last year, he's be contending for #1 status.
Sekera is already skating with the team, and is expected to be playing sometime in March. After the shenanigans that the Leafs pulled with Lupul and Robidas, plus Chicago's way of getting Hossa off the books, the league isn't going to tolerate any more tomfoolery regarding LTIR. There is no conceivable way that the morons running the Oilers could come up with something clever enough to sneak it past the league.</div></div>
Jesse Puljujarvi was never tried on the first pp unit.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 janv. 2019 à 2 h 7
Sujet:
Next Year
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeterChiarelli</b></div><div>In which case, the pick Buffalo got from San Jose would have been a better target. That however is contingent on St. Louis falling out of the top-10. I can see Buffalo moving that pick if they already have the 2 earlier firsts. This isn't a strong draft year either; the gap between 1st Round and 2nd Round players is bigger than in previous years.
Shot-handedness is blown out of proportion, especially with wingers. It really only matters with centers in regards to which side of the ice the draw is on and for defence in regards to being able to take away a pass or chip off the boards. Take the better player available.
And to correct you, you do not have the cap space to give Johansson a $1M raise, and I explained to you why in my post.</div></div>
I believe Cozens is a better player than Podkolzin. Podkolzin had worse numbers then Kraftsov when Kraftsov was a year younger. And we do need a RHS for the pp. Ever heard of the one-timer?
I don't think Sekera will come off of LTIR. The entire LTIR business is shady. Players like Lupul are probably able to play. In which case I could give Johansson a 1 or even 2 million raise.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
27 janv. 2019 à 1 h 44
Sujet:
Next Year
I<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeterChiarelli</b></div><div>Tampa Bay can't trade their 1st Round Pick unless they fail to win the Stanley Cup, in which case, I can't see them downgrading the pick. They aren't a rebuilding team trying to maximize assets at the draft, and will look to bring in the best player they possibly could in order to sustain their dominance as the best team in the NHL.
Edmonton won't be drafting high enough to pick Cozens: he's essentially a consensus 5th, and Podkolzin would be a better choice at #3 if Edmonton wins that lottery. Kaliyev won't make it past pick 15: either he goes higher than that (MacKenzie has him 13th overall) or the Hurricanes stick to their owner's mantra of only drafting snipers. He's got the best shot in the draft, and despite the criticisms, is a relatively decent all-around player.
The Washington trades - should they be combined into a single trade at the deadline - are fine. I usually go Bura and a 4th for Chiasson and Rieder, as Washington's in a spot where they need to slow down on how many picks they ship out or risk having a decimated prospect pool for when they aren't contenders anymore.
Chiasson probably earns a cap%-equivalent deal to what Maroon got this year (read: more), Puljujarvi probably gets a smidge less, Khaira will probably get a smidge less, and McElhinney shouldn't get a 2nd year on his deal. The dude's 35 years old, and most goalies fall off the rails at around 31. A one year deal is fine (even though there are better options imo), but two is very risky. Johansson, should he be in good health, probably gets north of $4M.
Sekera won't be on LTIR come the end of this season, so you'll need to find a way to get the money to work with his hit either on the team, retained and dumped, or bought-out. I'd also consider an upgrade on Manning: a player at league-minimum is likely to be just as good as him, and there's some mild savings to be had stashing him in the minors and bringing on someone at around $700k.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeastModeUnknown</b></div><div>Not sure Tampa takes that for 2 reasons. Keep the quality player, and 2 their is a condition if Tampa wins the cup this years first will be a NYR pick.</div></div>
Tampa was just a random team, any team with a late-ish first works. This is if the Oilers win the lottery and get the 3rd overall pick. I would prefer Cozens over Podkolzin. He's a fast RHS, exactly what we need. We also have the cap space to sign Johansson to a bigger deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 janv. 2019 à 8 h 0
Sujet:
Incredible Top-6 - IS THIS REALISTIC OR NOT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TCMonkey</b></div><div>It wouldn't take MANY other teams to beat that offer, just one team would do.</div></div>
What team would beat the offer and what would the offer be?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 janv. 2019 à 8 h 0
Sujet:
Incredible Top-6 - IS THIS REALISTIC OR NOT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hedman77</b></div><div>What do you think?</div></div>
It's obviously not going to happen, but I think the value is good.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 janv. 2019 à 7 h 31
Sujet:
Incredible Top-6 - IS THIS REALISTIC OR NOT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TCMonkey</b></div><div>If I am playing the role of Ottawa's GM I'd be asking for Maksimov, Bouchard and the unprotected 1st. That might seem rich but for sure there'd be better offers on the table for Mark Stone than the one you made, especially from teams that are more confident they can get an extension worked out.</div></div>
I would give up more if Stone agreed to re-sign here beforehand.
I'm not sure many other teams would beat this offer. They might give up better prospects, but I think Dorion would be very tempted by the prospect of a top-10 1st, which they don't have this year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 janv. 2019 à 4 h 31
Sujet:
I would trade Edmonton 2nd line for Calgary 3rd line any day
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jassan28</b></div><div>Neal is slightly better than Lucic due to reputation with consistency and better skating
Nuge is way better than Jankowski it doesn't compare
Bennet is way better than Puljujarvi
Flames win this but I'm just used to losing as an Oiler's fan</div></div>
Pulju is nearly as good as Bennett, two years younger, not a bust yet. Sorry, but no one in their right mind would take that line over the Oilers.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 janv. 2019 à 2 h 15
Sujet:
I would trade Edmonton 2nd line for Calgary 3rd line any day
I definitely wouldn't.
Lucic = Neal
Jankowski <<<<<<< Nuge
Bennett < Pulju
Forum:
Armchair-GM
13 janv. 2019 à 2 h 12
Sujet:
to start
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>BeterChiarelli</b></div><div>The only realistic dumps you've got here are the Spooner and Kassian ones. Benning won't fetch more than Spooner, and the odds of the Blues taking Russell while giving up assets during a retool year are very slim. The Bruins aren't taking on $5.5M in dead cap either.
If things were as simple as just fluking into other teams taking Edmonton's crap so they could drop a combined $15M on Stone and Skinner, this team wouldn't be in as dire a situation as it currently is. Things don't work that way however. You've underpaid Stone and Skinner by at least $1M each. Petrovic won't get an NHL contract next season over $1M in AAV either.
Not fixing the goaltending and defence won't result in any realistic movement for Edmonton in the standings next year either.</div></div>
Our biggest problem right now is depth scoring. Adding Mark Stone and Jeff Skinner would definitely help.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 janv. 2019 à 7 h 3
Sujet:
Improved Team - IS THIS REALISTIC
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SammyT_51</b></div><div>That pick would likely be with protection and more than likely moved to 2020 when Oilers might be playoff team again.
Tarasenko deal is fine. RNH is really underrated centerman with great talent and many good things in his game. I think either another 2nd or 2020 1st would be needed if you want retention on Tarasenko as he is worth every penny of that 7.5mil contract despite current struggles.</div></div>
I specifically wrote that the 1st is unprotected. Given the uncertainty of the pick and the possibility of it being top-10, I think Ottawa accepts.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
12 janv. 2019 à 6 h 53
Sujet:
Improved Team - IS THIS REALISTIC
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SammyT_51</b></div><div>Ottawa would ask for Bouchard to start for Stone. Not 2 overpaid bums, likely a bust and 1st rounder.</div></div>
Stone is an upcoming UFA though. Manning and Spooner are for cap, and the 1st could be a lottery pick.
What do you think of the Tarasenlo deal?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 janv. 2019 à 2 h 24
Sujet:
Team Canada A
Why in the world is Michael Matheson there?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 janv. 2019 à 1 h 37
Sujet:
Allons-y
Not that bad, although I don't like the Yamamoto trade. He is worth far more than Jarnkrok.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 janv. 2019 à 13 h 37
Sujet:
Boots ED roster
Deals look good! Only issue is that Sekera can't be fit under the cap when (if?) he comes back.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
1 janv. 2019 à 6 h 37
Sujet:
Finally a Deep Top-9 - REALISTIC OR NOT
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>SammyT_51</b></div><div>The idea is good.I think there is a team that would need PK 4C, probably even washington could take their eye on Brodziak. But I dont think they would want Rieder so.. what about Brodziak, Maksimov, 3rd for Burakovsky?</div></div>
I'm pretty high on Maksimov, so I'd want to exchange it with a different prospect. Safin?
Premier
2
3
Suivant
Page 2
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com