cbalzer28

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Book_Hockey</b></div><div>I did the math, that's why I said it's not 70, I don't need you to break it down for me</div></div>
So you said that comment knowing it was 69.13? I'm sorry I wasted my time with you

Forum: Armchair-GM22 sept. 2020 à 9 h 7

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FloppyBiscuit</b></div><div>I'd say Khovanov is 4th or 5th at worst. He's our #1 center prospect and there's a pretty considerable margin between him and our next best center prospect, which isn't a good thing for the Wild. Would be foolish to move him for Strome considering I think we're pretty far from a win-now position</div></div>

I agree but I dont know if Guerin knows that lol

Forum: Armchair-GM22 sept. 2020 à 9 h 6

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Book_Hockey</b></div><div>That ain't a 70 point pace homie</div></div>

Check your math there "Homie" 59points/70games=.843 x 82 games = 69.13 points. If you wanna be a stickler its 69 and change but we all know Panarin would get Strome that 70th point ;)

Forum: Armchair-GM21 sept. 2020 à 14 h 43

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>Khovanov is off limits...especially if you want the Wild to take Smith (even if for only one year).

However, I can see the always short-sighted and impatient Wild going Khovanov for Strome straight up, but I wouldn’t do it.</div></div>

Why is he off limits? I dont follow Wild prospects much but Im seeing him at 5 or not even top 5 for them on some lists. And its not like they have the strongest prospect pool in the league either.

Forum: Armchair-GM21 sept. 2020 à 14 h 41

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Book_Hockey</b></div><div>Wait when did Strome hit 70 pts?</div></div>

Sorry had a 70 point season pace. He had 59 with 12 games left.

Forum: Armchair-GM21 sept. 2020 à 14 h 21

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>FloppyBiscuit</b></div><div>I really don't want Ryan Strome but I could live with Guerin giving up our 2020 2nd for him. But with Smith attached, I'd give you our 2020 4th and like a 5th round pick in 2021 at best.</div></div>

They need help down the middle, and as much as everyone says Strome is the worst 70 point forward ever lol I still think he can get something solid back. Plus smith has just one year left and he can play left or right side def and would be a solid bottom pair. If a team has the capspace hes not a bad option for depth. I don't think your 6th or 7th best prospect is that much of an ask.

Forum: Armchair-GM5 août 2020 à 14 h 13

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>Yeah, like I said, he could certainly become good, but it's certainly not a risk that I'd take right now.

I do think that the amount you get offered for him is going to decline the longer you hold onto him though. If he's still around next spring, he's going to Seattle.</div></div>

He's the only one they have to protect, everyone else is exempt and Hank is gone.

Forum: Armchair-GM5 août 2020 à 13 h 31

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>Georgiev's .910 save percentage is league average for 2019-2020. His GAA is .22 above league average. His GA% is exactly league average. His quality shot % is exactly league average. His GSAA was .12.

Every single one of his numbers screams "League average". Does he have potential? Sure! Would I give up Byfield or Stutzle, and move back 6 places in the draft to see if he's going to hit it? Not a chance.</div></div>

He also played in a 3 goalie rotation with one of the worst defenses in the league so I would take those numbers with a grain of salt. Ive seen nearly every game of his and I think he is clearly a starter in this league and top 15 potential in the right situation. But I guess we wait and see and honestly winning the lottery and keeping him and Igor would be my favorite outcome so he doesnt haunt the Rangers for years to come

Forum: Armchair-GM5 août 2020 à 13 h 28

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xqb15</b></div><div>There is always something that happens, but this year unless somebody pulls the trigger on Sanderson or say Mercer, the top 8 is Laf, Byfield, Stutzle, Raymond, Rossi, Drysdale, Holtz, Perfetti. But somebody always does so yeah you could be right, I remember just last year being shocked DET took Seider at 6 and the Oilers taking Broberg at 8.</div></div>

I feel like it always seems set in stone but the rangers taking Kravstov at 9 was a shock even, I have seen people not as high on Raymond, and Holtz and higher on Lundell but yea anything could happen past Lafreniere, Byfield/Stutzle. IMO

Forum: Armchair-GM5 août 2020 à 12 h 48

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Xqb15</b></div><div>No they aren’t. They are taking Byfield or Stutzle at 3. The only way they don’t is an overpay, and let’s face it that isn’t even enough for them to consider doing it. And NO way Drysdale drops to 9, and very unlikely Perfetti does either. In fact it is highly unlikely that the Rangers pick 9, in fact the odds are better that they pick 1OA instead of 9.</div></div>

I mean every series they need to come out is tied 1-1 so anything could happen but thats why I said 9 or 10. But I think we will be surprised who is still there at 9 or 10 in this draft.

Forum: Armchair-GM5 août 2020 à 12 h 46

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>Sorry, meant to note that the difference in value between Lajoie and Rykov is likely the difference between Nilsson and Georgiev.

If you think about it, the Sens don't really need a goalie this year either though. It's not like they're going to be competitive, they have Nilsson and Hogberg already. If they want to upgrade in net, there's a bevy of short and/or long term options available in free agency. I'm not sold on Georgiev being a long term answer for anything other than a 35-40 game/year option.

If you're giving up a guy like Byfield or Stutzle, you better be getting back a sure thing, not 3 big question marks.</div></div>

I disagree, he has gradually been given more games every year and continues to impress, obviously every cheap contract still has something to prove but thats why there not making 8 mil a year. The risk you run to get a good starting goalie under control for years to come and to start at 2 mil/year. instead you could end up paying big money for those UFA's in a tight cap crunch year.

Forum: Armchair-GM5 août 2020 à 12 h 42

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan</b></div><div>26. 3C without Panarin. Never cracked 50 without a Star (Tavares with NYI, Panarin with NYR) He is gone.</div></div>

What about the numbers he put up after he went to the rangers after the trade deadline. Sure you have an excuse for those too. Or maybe he finally got a chance at middle 6 center minutes. Porbably a combination of the two though

Forum: Armchair-GM5 août 2020 à 10 h 57

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>That's not good for Ottawa at all. Would you have taken Anders Niilson, Max Lajoie and 9 OA for Kakko last year?</div></div>

Youre comparing 30 YO life long backup in Nilson to Georgiev who is a cheap starter in this league that is in his early 20's still and will continue to improve. And I actually like Lajoie and the Rangers didnt need a goalie last year so its not apples to apples.

Forum: Armchair-GM5 août 2020 à 10 h 55

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>Ottawa :laugh You're not moving up 6 or 7 spots for those pieces. Not even close enough to move up that many spots.</div></div>

Ottawa is getting a starting goalie and a defensive prospect that is ready in a year, to fall 6 spots. Unless your ok with unknown commodities in net. Like I said throw in a 3rd rd pick as well but Its only 6 or 7 spots in one of the deepest drafts eve. Drysdale, Perfetti or Lundell could potentially fall to 9

Forum: Armchair-GM5 août 2020 à 10 h 50

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wadejos123</b></div><div>Correct me if I'm wrong but the NYR don't have the 9th or 10th pick. Aren't they like 16th?. Only way of them going that high is Chicago, MTL, and all the other teams ahead of them winning their play in series. I'm gonna say its unlikely that every single lower seed wins</div></div>

They get anywhere from 9-14 depending on how the play in rounds pan out

Forum: Armchair-GM5 août 2020 à 9 h 39

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan</b></div><div>Shows that he performs on Panarin's play genius. You wanna pay this bum $6M to be a benefactor of an $11M player?</div></div>

I didnt say I wanted to pay him 6 mil but you're rating him like he is some 4th line chump. He's a 25 YO middle 6 center that can play PP and PK and get you 40-50 points a year. And I don't care who is line mate is he still was on pace for 70 pts this year. I don't hear people say other certain players are good because there linemate.

Forum: Armchair-GM4 août 2020 à 13 h 36

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan</b></div><div>Don't listen to him, He's a one-sided clown. NYR would be lucky to get a 2nd for Strome after his true colors showing in these Play Ins. I don't even think he fits in CGY does he?</div></div>

So you'd rather base you information off of two games in the bubble after a 4 month break than what he did the entire 70 games before that? Seems backwards

Forum: Armchair-GM4 août 2020 à 13 h 35