PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
bruinsdude77
Membre depuis
21 juin 2015
Équipe favorite
Bruins de Boston
Deuxième équipe favorite
Predators de Nashville
Messages dans les forums
506
Messages par jour
0.2
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars 2022 à 16 h 24
Sujet:
Stand Pat
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruins1054_gmb</b></div><div>If you could get Garland without giving up a 1st round pick I'd be shocked. DeBrusk would not be totally ideal for VAN as the reason for moving Garland would be to clear Cap. DeBrusk will likely ask for similar money that Garland is being paid.</div></div>
DeBrusk and Garland are more similar than you might think. I agree that a trade would be more likely though if DeBrusk agrees to an extension below his QO first, which it sounds like he is willing to do.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars 2022 à 16 h 15
Sujet:
Stand Pat
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruins1054_gmb</b></div><div>I do not like the market this year. The biggest positions of need seem to be 1RW and 2C, neither of which will come cheap or have many options available. A LHD grouping of Grzelcyk, Reilly, and Forbort could be upgraded, but if you look at the defensive metrics for all three of those players, they have all been very effective.</div></div>
If I told you the B's could get Connor Garland and Justin Braun for say Jake DeBrusk, a second or third rounder, and another couple mid-round picks or B-level prospects, would you still stand pat? I agree that now doesn't appear to be the time to solve the long-term holes at center and LD1. But I think replacing Clifton at RD3 and swapping out DeBrusk at RW1 would be a huge boost. Maybe add one additional depth player for cheap and I would call that a great deadline.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars 2022 à 16 h 10
Sujet:
Broons TDL
1. Zboril is out for the year (torn ACL)
2. Moving Coyle from third line center where he has been stellar makes zero sense
3. Forbort is the Bruins' best penalty killing defenseman and most physical defenseman. He's not being traded right now.
4. Mason Langenbrunner's dad is the Bruins Director of Player Development. Hard to see him being moved lol
5. Clifton, Blidh, and Lazar are not clearing waivers to get to the "taxi squad" aka the AHL
6. That's too much for Domi in my opinion
I wouldn't mind if Gio and Domi ended up in Boston at the deadline, but these trades and the resulting lineup are all wrong.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars 2022 à 16 h 2
Sujet:
Stand Pat
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruins1054_gmb</b></div><div>I understand disagreeing with standing pat. What I don't understand is why everyone thinks this team goes into full rebuild once Bergeron is gone. A foundation of Pastrnak, Marchand, Hall, McAvoy, and Swayman is too much to ever be at a point of non-contention. The Bruins will need another top 6 C sooner than later, but that does not mean they have to give up their top and mid-range assets to try to win this year because it's hopeless in the future without Bergeron. The Bruins can continue to be a playoff team for years to come. That's what great franchises do. They are always competitive and seldom have to enter a rebuild, which is never a guarantee. Look at Buffalo.</div></div>
Oh I agree. I don't think they're hopeless at all once Bergeron is gone, especially with the likes of Bo Horvat, J.T. Miller, and Ryan O'Reilly hitting free agency in 2023. I just don't want to stand pat while Bergeron is here. I say keep your best assets but be willing to move anything else to fill in the gaps this year.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars 2022 à 15 h 51
Sujet:
Stand Pat
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bruins1054_gmb</b></div><div>So you're not okay with standing pat, but you're not okay with trading the assets other teams want. Seems like an oxymoron to me.</div></div>
There is an ocean of possibility between standing pat and making trades that require giving up Lysell, Lohrei, and the 2023 first, my friend. The B's could grab multiple solid assets - rental or term - without touching any of those pieces.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars 2022 à 15 h 25
Sujet:
Stand Pat
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>KennyBoi</b></div><div>At this point in time of where the Bruins are, those 3 pieces need to be untouchables unless the Jacobs are fine with becoming the next Sens or Red Wings for half a decade.</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>The bruins have a 24 year old franchise defensemen, a 25 year old number 2 D locked up for 6 years, a 23 year old goalie that last time i checked led the league in GAA, a 25 year old who has led the league in goals, and a top five player in hte NHL, who while 33, doesn’t really appear to be slowing down.
What on earth are you talking about?</div></div>
Both of these things can be true. I don't agree at all that the Bruins are destined for a rebuild but in a salary cap league you also need to draft and develop and Lysell looks like a potential star and Lohrei a lock as a top-four defenseman at a position of need. You don't move either for a rental and I don't think you move Lysell at all. If Lohrei is going, a long-term top-pair LD a la Chychrun needs to be coming back and the rest of the package can't be too extreme. The 2023 first also needs to be reserved for a long-term add.
As for the idea that the B's should stand pat, I completely disagree. The market will settle closer to the deadline and if high prices stick for term players, so be it. There are only so many runs left with Bergeron. Either find some defensive depth and top-six forward to rent for a good price or swing for the fences with a long-term add at LD1, RW1, or C2. Don't be stupid with your most valuable pieces but don't protect them on principal alone. Most importantly, don't do nothing.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 mars 2022 à 15 h 13
Sujet:
Deadline
I really like Garland and want the Bruins to trade for him. With that said, I would NEVER move Lysell for him. Garland is better than DeBrusk but just comparable enough that the B's might be able to get away with DeBrusk (with a below-QO extension) and decent pick or prospect for Garland.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars 2022 à 12 h 43
Sujet:
Bertuzzi
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Olson does not project to be an NHLer. Beecher projects to be a 4th liner who has produced little offense in college. Debrusk is closer to a detriment than he is an asset at this point. You have no primary piece in the Wings trade ie a 1st or a high end prospect. Just a bunch of meh.
Think you overvalue here.</div></div>
Just writing off Olson because you don't know anything about him is silly. He's a 20-year-old kid with three NCAA seasons under his belt already having a better season than say Karson Kuhlman ever did at UMD. But sure he doesn't project to be an NHLer you say. I'm including him in a deal for Derrick Brassard, a 34-year-old UFA on a definite seller who has been injured for much of the year. Flyers would absolutely take Olson for him and you yourself already said a 3rd gets Braun.
Beecher is also just 20 with three NCAA seasons and has been buried on the Michigan depth chart and dealt with injuries last year. There is still too much unknown to call him fourth line or bust. I'm not alone in maintaining value on him either. He's still considered a top-five Bruins prospect by most.
I'm no DeBrusk fan, but to call him a detriment is not fair. In a regular top-six role in Detroit, who has the cap space to give him a look, he's probably a 20/40 guy. The Wings only have three forwards with over 30 points right now, one of which is Bertuzzi. They could use DeBrusk.
Think you undervalue here.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars 2022 à 12 h 30
Sujet:
Bertuzzi
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Datsyukian</b></div><div>Ya that doesn't fall under injury concerns haha that's called back surgery. He's healed and quite productive. The vaccine issue will be a distant memory soon.
This trade doesn't even come close.</div></div>
Oh right, spinal issues are never long-term concerns for professional athletes...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars 2022 à 12 h 17
Sujet:
Bertuzzi
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Datsyukian</b></div><div>So much wrong here even after the trade.
Injury concerns? Shot at Larkin? Oilers in the Cup Final?</div></div>
Bertuzzi missed almost all of last season due to back surgery. Or did you forget? And I covered my bases with all potential Canadian playoff opponents if you're reading carefully.
I admitted that Larkin was a longshot hence the 1% note. Just saying that it doesn't hurt the Bruins chances of signing him, which is absolutely true even if their current odds are slim to none. If that's the biggest sticking point of this mock, you're all just looking for something to scream about lol.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars 2022 à 12 h 13
Sujet:
Bertuzzi
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>Both are declined pretty quickly.
3rd might get you Braun. Olson and Seny have little to no value.
Bertuzzi starts with a 1st.
Nobody is taking Debrusk without an extension with a paycut in place unless they are giving up little.</div></div>
I don't follow your logic. "Both are declined pretty quickly" but "3rd might get Braun" in a trade that includes a third? Brassard is not worth that much given his season to say the trade is declined quickly even though Braun, the more valuable piece, is worth the third leaving Olson and Senyshyn for Brassard. Olson is himself a recent third-round pick and the top play-maker on one of the best teams in the NCAA - not exactly "little to no value". Senyshyn is just a throw in as he has requested a trade and Philly can give him a look down the stretch before he's a UFA.
As for the Bertuzzi deal, you all may be right that it's not enough. I think that's very possible. However I also think the vaccine issue hurts his value and the return is being underrated. DeBrusk has already said he's willing to sign an extension below his QO, which makes him more valuable to Detroit. The Wings are no longer in the early stages of a rebuild and could use a player in his prime in return for Bertuzzi. If anyone outside of Boston has a good read on Beecher, it's Detroit who watched him play down the road at Michigan the last three years. He's still considered the Bruins' first or second-best center prospect, which is what the Wings need. I personally believe that Beecher has the physical tools to be a late bloomer in the pros and I didn't give him up easily. Berglund is a tough call because I have not been impressed with his progression, but some prospect pundits still like his potential. If bumping up the pick to a second or conditional first (w/ strict conditions) or "upgrading" Beecher to Steen or Studnicka or Berglund to Ahcan, Mast, or Gallagher gets the job done, I would still make the deal.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars 2022 à 11 h 5
Sujet:
Bos TDL
Woof the value on that Lehkonen trade is brutal. I wouldn't trade either of those pieces separately for him, nevertheless together.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars 2022 à 11 h 2
Sujet:
Realistic TDL
Can't call a post "realistic" and then project a six-for-one trade that includes two first-round picks and two second-round picks plus two roster players from a contender. The opposite of realistic.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars 2022 à 11 h 0
Sujet:
Realistic TDL
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ON3M4N</b></div><div>Zboril will be a UFA this off-season. Not sure he adds any value to this</div></div>
Agreed. Zboril would have to come with a built-in extension.
This is too much anyways. Brett Harrison is not just a guy, especially to a team with no elite talent down the middle. Not sure I would even do just a second for Domi.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
16 mars 2022 à 10 h 55
Sujet:
Luke Kunin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bhavikp27</b></div><div>Kunin's ceiling is bottom-6. No thanks.</div></div>
I agree, but I don't think that rules out a trade. DeBrusk's inconsistent effort makes him a poor fit for top-six OR bottom-six, whereas at least Kunin competes hard and could be a successful bottom-six forward with above average offensive upside in that role. Who knows what the forward corps looks like moving forward, especially in the bottom six with Lazar and Blidh as UFA's this summer and Smith and Nosek as UFA's next summer. If the Bs are certain they can sign Kunin at or below his QO on a two-or-three year deal, I like the add.
With that being said, DeBrusk's value is higher than Kunin's right now and I'm not sure the team would be comfortable sliding Kunin in to that top line role either. So this deal has to include something extra from Nashville - either a pick or prospect - to even out the value and allow the B's to balance their trade capital if they have to send assets elsewhere for a RW1. I personally wouldn't mind adding Alexander Campbell or Ryan Ufko, a couple mid-round college prospects having good seasons.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 mars 2022 à 15 h 58
Sujet:
Three From Seattle
Only if you love DeBrusk and think he's a reliable option on the top line, which if you actually watch the team you should not believe. Anyone can score with Bergy and Marchand but DeBrusk has been bringing them down lately. DeBrusk wants to go and the Bs should let him. The inconsistent effort is infuriating. Donskoi is a more complete and consistent player, even if he lacks star power. The Bruins were interested in him in 2019 for a reason. Donskoi at a cheap price, another RW option in Appleton, and an upgrade at LD (yet another player the Bruins have previously shown interest in). But ok they're worse.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars 2022 à 19 h 27
Sujet:
Fresh Starts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>Just qualify him.
Simple. Done.</div></div>
No thanks
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars 2022 à 16 h 30
Sujet:
Sanheim
If you're going to give up this much for Sanheim, you do it July 1 when he's eligible to sign an extension. Can't give up Vaakanainen and first plus two roster players for a potential year plus rental. I like Sanheim and think he could play with McAvoy, but save this package for someone you KNOW can play with McAvoy.
Now if Konecny becomes part of this deal as well then I'm more interested...
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars 2022 à 16 h 18
Sujet:
Fresh Starts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>It’s not like those are the only options with debrusk. His agent has said they will sign below the QO. Keep him for the season, tell him that the better he plays, the more teams will want to trade for him, and move him in the off-season.
Use that money elsewhere. With the flat, or flat adjacent cap, there will be plenty of bargains out there.</div></div>
If you keep DeBrusk through the deadline, you lose all your leverage. DeBrusk can wait for the QO deadline for either a cushy fallback deal that the Bruins don't want or else he hits free agency where there will be more suitors and better contract terms given the competition.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars 2022 à 13 h 21
Sujet:
Fresh Starts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>Because he’s underperforming his contract. Would much rather have $5.5M in cap for the next four seasons.
Clifton is fine in his role.</div></div>
I think we just disagree here. I feel like a) "fine" is not enough and Clifton needs to be upgraded (now and long-term) and Braun would be a great add and b) Konecny is not really underperforming his contract and certainly wouldn't playing on the top line. He is a much better investment given his age and ability than DeBrusk at a $4.4MM QO or swapping DeBrusk for a rental and having a hole in the lineup again next season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars 2022 à 12 h 8
Sujet:
Fresh Starts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CMcAvoy73</b></div><div>Two players from philly the bruins should have no interest in, for two valuable pieces and a 2nd rounder. No thanks.</div></div>
Lol please explain why the Bruins should have no interest in a younger, better, and more accomplished version of DeBrusk, who has asked for a trade and needs top be replaced art RW1, and a veteran RHD rental who plays 20+ minutes of solid defense at a low cost while we have Clifton and zero depth behind him at RD3.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars 2022 à 11 h 29
Sujet:
Fresh Starts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bruinsdude77</b></div><div>Pysyk and Hinostroza aren't exactly top of the market targets. Contenders are not adding them as starters, but as depth options and that isn't worth much. If the Sabres would rather hold on them for no reason and let them walk, so be it. I would rather take whatever capital I could get and save a little money.</div></div>
For example, last year, Erik Gustafsson went for a 7th and Michal Raffl went for a 5th. Would you rather have that package?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 mars 2022 à 11 h 24
Sujet:
Fresh Starts
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>thewookie1</b></div><div>Buffalo declines, we aren't helping you for a 24 year old AHLer with 1 NHL goal, a random dude and a 5th</div></div>
Pysyk and Hinostroza aren't exactly top of the market targets. Contenders are not adding them as starters, but as depth options and that isn't worth much. If the Sabres would rather hold on them for no reason and let them walk, so be it. I would rather take whatever capital I could get and save a little money.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
8 mars 2022 à 17 h 3
Sujet:
bs tdl
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Gofnut999</b></div><div>1st 2 are fine. The Van trade is terrible.
Garland and Debrusk same age, same production, both wings that can’t play center, both suck defensively. Same player. Not giving up extra pieces especially the 1st.</div></div>
You don't honestly believe that Garland and DeBrusk are *that* comparable, do you? One has 39 goals and 74 points over the past three years with the Boston Bruins. The other has 48 goals and 109 points over the past three years with the freaking Arizona Coyotes and Vancouver Canucks, not to mention is an objectively better defensive player and play-maker. Maybe a first or an A prospect is too steep, but give me Garland for DeBrusk and "pieces" any day.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
22 févr. 2022 à 15 h 5
Sujet:
Yotes Blockbuster
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div>If you boil all the BOS side assets into a single value, its probably fine in terms of just overall value. The thing is, I think Arizona will want a consolidation of the assets into a more clear and concise tabulation of the assets. So for example, remove 4 things from this deal, and replace them with 1 different thing. whether that be a player, pick, prospect. doesn't matter.
Any time a trade that involves more than 5 different assets going the other way from one team, the value becomes almost murky and too hard to evaluate properly. That's why they are so rare to make but if you are hell bent on making a big splash, try making 3 separate trades for those 3 players. That way its easier to evaluate what each player is costing. Might help sell or dissuade your proposal. As is, its just too many moving parts for one single trade that making it in real life is almost impossible in my opinion.</div></div>
I agree with this 100% and in most cases I wouldn't send eight pieces in a trade. However, Arizona already has no depth and that is with a team filled with expiring contracts. They could use the influx of players and certainly won't mind three high value picks. As for the breakdown, I see it as this:
BOS receives: Jakob Chychrun
ARI receives: 2022 first-round pick, 2023 conditional first-round pick, Jake DeBrusk, Oskar Steen, Connor Clifton (John Moore)
BOS receives: Phil Kessel (UFA), Johan Larsson (UFA)
ARI receives: 2024 conditional first-round pick, Quinn Olson
Premier
2
3
4
Suivant
Page 3
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com